punjabi aryan sexJFL At ethnics who want to pretend they are descendants of Aryans and "aren't shitskin"
punjabi aryan sex
Did you expect anything better from a bunch of autists who have nothing in the looks department to offer and so are forced to argue about race and better looking people of said races?
Indians are Gods we need to know our competition.
D
1.) Every Sub4 man is a Deathnic.
2.) Light tanned olive skin, jet black hairs and blue/green eyes is the supreme ideal coloring on men. Like David Gandy.
2.) Light tanned olive skin, jet black hairs and blue/green eyes is the supreme ideal coloring on men. Like David Gandy.
Glad the forum is more blackpilled about JBC
You have to have literal deformed bones and ratios to fail with that pheno/colouring.
W
You never know the guy in the office next to you who you think is European.. could actually be a cheap imitation shitskin who is faking it.
I'm not an "aryan" myself and don't give two shits about it. You're just as ridiculous as those turks and iranians, coping your inceldom with the "muh aryan master race" meme JFL.
Also that's just a matter of opinion man. Inthe end we are all incels.
Same, my brother has sky blue eyes, my sister Green, dad grey-green. I have dark brown.Honestly i don't care about race, i just wish i had my dad's blue hunter eyes it would have gave me such a halo
yes, i am coping of course. i know that myself too lol xD
Aryans are an indian group though.
Also, like many said in the thread, dark skinned caucasions, be they Meds or Menas, are more attractive than light skinned meds, be they germanic or scandinavian.
Also, like many said in the thread, dark skinned caucasions, be they Meds or Menas, are more attractive than light skinned meds, be they germanic or scandinavian.
I accept that Iranians have Aryan blood in them. Look at the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980's. Despite US intelligence support and monetary support and the Iraqis for the most part had superior weapons and a better army the Iranians held their own and even took Iraq down a peg or two. Pretty much the only superior weapon the Iranians had was the F14 Tomcat and its AIM54 Phoenix missile.
The fact Iran held their own is proof of Persian racial superiority over Arabs - primarily due to their Aryan genes.
Likewise the Persian genes in Northern India - the most combat capable regiments of the Indian army are from North west India around the Punjab.
The fact Iran held their own is proof of Persian racial superiority over Arabs - primarily due to their Aryan genes.
Likewise the Persian genes in Northern India - the most combat capable regiments of the Indian army are from North west India around the Punjab.
Actually, there are Nordic Iranians so it's not completely false. They most likely have Greek admixture or they are just gene mutations but considering the Greeks had cucked them, I think it makes sense. However most Iranians aren't Nordic Iranian.
They may have a racial superiority over Arabs but that's where it ends. Some Indic races have a racial superiority over both Arabs and Persians but only the Islamic ones in modern-day Pakistan.
Last edited:
I think in the end it boils down to how much Ancestral South Indian DNA you have. Here is a summary of some samples taken from various groups in India and a handful from Pakistan.
The main division seems to be between AASI and Indus/Steppe. Even Pathans and Kalash only have around 5-10% more Steppe ancestry than Gangetic plain dwellers but the thing that sets the Pathans apart is their lack of ASI (Dravidian) ancestry. Pathans only have around 5% Dravidian ancestry compared to 20% in the Punjab and Kashmir regions and around 30% for upper caste UP gangetics.
Who doth speaketh the mleccha bhasha? – Brown Pundits
www.brownpundits.com
based and epicpilled
N
A lot of those exist, or ones that have one fucking white looking feature and claim they are ayran or superior caste when they still look like a brown sack of shit
What's the deal with Sindhis? I was skimming "The People of India" by Herbery Hope Risley at my uni library and came across this map, it categorises Karachi dwellers as "Turko-Mongol" as along with the Balochs and Pathans, while it categorised Punjabis and Kashmiris (along with Rajputana Agency folk) as "Indo-Aryan".
The area down the Western coast of India is labelled "Scytho-Dravidian while UP is "Aryo-Dravidian"
Sad, but true.
Attachments
Last edited:
JFL, the historical Aryans mostly had dark hair and eyes, and probably did look like many modern Iranians.
Sindhis are also Indic, making Pakistan's population overwhelmingly Indic. They are definitely not Iranic like Balochis and Pashtuns so the author of that book was/is wrong.
But certain ancient Iranic peoples were characterized as having gray eyes and red hair. Sogdians, for example, if I am correct. Or Scythians.
Never began tbh
Except in my case it is true.
Okay mister white god.
Don't call me god. And I can't help it if it is true JFL my grandad is blonde/blue eyed and two of my cousins are blonde/green eyed. Even my sisters have brown hair and freckles, and very pale skin. I'm from Northern Iraq so I don't see why it's so hard to think an Arab from there wouldn't look white considering that area is full of Turks, Armeninas, Kurds, and Persians
N
brutal ethnicpill
Is it so hard to accept that you were born an ugly shitskin manlet? You are not your grandad or sister. You will never ever be white. It’s unlucky, but why do you lie to yourself?
@gymletethnicel @FullTimeLoser
Last edited:
Because, dumbass, I'm not brown skinned, I'm white skinned. It's not like I even give a shit either way, my worst features by far my chin and small hands/feet. Meanwhile my cousins who are darker than me mog me.
Arabs are inbred cousin fuckers. it's why Iran mogged them
They are the descendants of the ashes of the 1940's events.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
