Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Assume self-improvement really worked for sub 5 male. If a man is self-improving, it's at other low value men's expense

Convergence

Convergence

brazilian spergcel
-
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Posts
623
Representing the title situation, if we have men A and men B (both sub 5) competing for low value women C in which men A are better and more self-improved than men B, that would mean men A could pair with female Cs (again, assuming self-improvement could work and women Cs wouldn't aim for Chads, which they normally will). However, cucks will suggest men B to self-improve in order to get women C, but if men B did so, they would change places with men A, and now men A need self-improvement to be paired with someone.
In short, dating game for sub 5s is a widespread problem, and self-improvement is a solution which only affects a specific group, thus making men who try to improve and climb the sex ladder drop others in the process, not solving the problem, but changing the victims temporarily.
Truth is that "just improve yourself" is a platitude meant to get you busy while they reap the benefits of your participation in the social machine, like throwing a ball for a dog to catch.
 
It’s a mog or be mogged world. While the smv of even fat foids keep on rising as well as their standards, men have to constantly improve to shape up to those standards. This will lead to widespread competition as well as the eventual winners and losers that accompany them.
 
It’s a mog or be mogged world. While the smv of even fat foids keep on rising as well as their standards, men have to constantly improve to shape up to those standards. This will lead to widespread competition as well as the eventual winners and losers that accompany them.
Representing the title situation, if we have men A and men B (both sub 5) competing for low value women C in which men A are better and more self-improved than men B, that would mean men A could pair with female Cs (again, assuming self-improvement could work and women Cs wouldn't aim for Chads, which they normally will). However, cucks will suggest men B to self-improve in order to get women C, but if men B did so, they would change places with men A, and now men A need self-improvement to be paired with someone.
In short, dating game for sub 5s is a widespread problem
High IQ. I doubt IT will touch this. If they do I can't wait to see the mental gymnastics they pull of to rationalize this shit.
23097
 
High IQ. I doubt IT will touch this. If they do I can't wait to see the mental gymnastics they pull of to rationalize this shit.
View attachment 186638
:soy:> "Urr durr durr, inkels dink duh day-ting goom is sero soom. Stoopid inkels. Doont dey no queens haff unleemuted enargy an tuhm? Dey nuh haff feneet enargy an tuhm laak stoopid meels."
 
High iq, if self improvment is true then the pool that one is trying to get will always remain the same.
 
Extremely high IQ. Something normies will never be able to grasp.
It’s a mog or be mogged world
So fucking true. It's over for sub8 men.
 
>Inkwells aurh Ikchtells beaycause theay nu sealf impaoove, ualinke me whu watechs evury nu capeshiwt failm wiuth mauh wiifffeeesss sun tyaunrone, faukin inkchtelals thiank selfu impoovemnet ius liefiting weaights and haviaung decaent hyegine
124124422124241
 
They did touch it, boyos. Watch for future comments:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top