37YearOldVirgin
Too small to be seen by the female eye
-
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2018
- Posts
- 229
[Disclaimer: I haven't been on here long and am still trying to get my bearings regarding all of the concepts and terminology, so forgive me if this has been addressed before (even in depth), but I wanted to get the current state of thoughts and opinions and figured a thread was the best way to do it]
So I've noticed what appears to be a major competing high level narrative on this forum that's confusing me quite a bit, and wanted to know what all of you think on the matter. It seems to me that according to one camp of thought here, identifying as Incel definitionally equates to the condition of being a virgin or celibate for reasons that both are 'completely' out of one's control and 'immutable' (permanent/ inalterable). In other words, if the reasons for your celibacy are changeable or addressable in any way whatsoever.. then you are not Incel. Period.
On the other hand, I have also encountered within this forum frequent discussions related to, and even a declared intent to pursue, the phenomenon of 'Ascension', or the act escaping Inceldom via the process of doing everything in one's power to increase one's attractiveness to the opposite sex, including but not limited to : Working out/ getting fit; Upgrading personal style and hygiene; Bandaiding or concealing one's physical flaws (such as growing a beard to mask a weak chin/ jaw); Moving geographic locations to maximize the prevailing cultural perception of one's attractiveness; Working on one's self in order to maximize one's personal confidence, charm, likeability and overall charisma, or otherwise mitigate psychological or personality flaws and inhibitions through therapy and medication; and even undergoing plastic surgery to mitigate egregious facial imperfections.
Logically speaking, these two premises are mutually exclusive and can not coexist. In short, the truth of one necessarily negates the other.
Of course I have seen a rebuttal to the Ascension philosophy put forth a few times that more or less asserts that, while Ascension is strictly speaking possible, a 'true' Incel is beyond hope due to the aforementioned 'immutable' afflictions, and for that reason anyone who does succeed in escaping Inceldom was never really an Incel in the first place. But apart from this being a 'no true scottsman fallacy', where a position is prima facie assumed to be true and the counter position refuted merely on the basis of the trueness of the initial position (think one faction of Christianity claiming another faction is not truly Christian merely because they hold different or opposing beliefs), this would also seem to indicate that the number of 'true' Incels must indeed be very small, as the list of immutable conditions for which there is absolutely no remedy must also be very small (egregious mental and physical disabilities or deformaties being about the only ones I can really think of).
In any case, I'm very interested to know what you all think. Which is true (or true 'est')? Is it even possible to escape Inceldom? Are those who have Ascended or hope to Ascend Fakecels or Volcels? For Truecels, which are the 'true' conditions under which the Blackpill exclusively applies, and for which it is truly over. When can one say that there is literally zero percent chance of escape whilst still being 100% intellectually honest?
**For context, I'm a 37 year old virgin. White, 5'5, small frame, 100 lbs, bad skin, bugged out eyes with with huge bags under them, big bulbous nose, week cheeks and recessed chin, bad skin with alopecia, abysmal confidence and high levels of social anxiety. But currently I still seem to believe that escape is at least 'theoretically' possible.**
So I've noticed what appears to be a major competing high level narrative on this forum that's confusing me quite a bit, and wanted to know what all of you think on the matter. It seems to me that according to one camp of thought here, identifying as Incel definitionally equates to the condition of being a virgin or celibate for reasons that both are 'completely' out of one's control and 'immutable' (permanent/ inalterable). In other words, if the reasons for your celibacy are changeable or addressable in any way whatsoever.. then you are not Incel. Period.
On the other hand, I have also encountered within this forum frequent discussions related to, and even a declared intent to pursue, the phenomenon of 'Ascension', or the act escaping Inceldom via the process of doing everything in one's power to increase one's attractiveness to the opposite sex, including but not limited to : Working out/ getting fit; Upgrading personal style and hygiene; Bandaiding or concealing one's physical flaws (such as growing a beard to mask a weak chin/ jaw); Moving geographic locations to maximize the prevailing cultural perception of one's attractiveness; Working on one's self in order to maximize one's personal confidence, charm, likeability and overall charisma, or otherwise mitigate psychological or personality flaws and inhibitions through therapy and medication; and even undergoing plastic surgery to mitigate egregious facial imperfections.
Logically speaking, these two premises are mutually exclusive and can not coexist. In short, the truth of one necessarily negates the other.
Of course I have seen a rebuttal to the Ascension philosophy put forth a few times that more or less asserts that, while Ascension is strictly speaking possible, a 'true' Incel is beyond hope due to the aforementioned 'immutable' afflictions, and for that reason anyone who does succeed in escaping Inceldom was never really an Incel in the first place. But apart from this being a 'no true scottsman fallacy', where a position is prima facie assumed to be true and the counter position refuted merely on the basis of the trueness of the initial position (think one faction of Christianity claiming another faction is not truly Christian merely because they hold different or opposing beliefs), this would also seem to indicate that the number of 'true' Incels must indeed be very small, as the list of immutable conditions for which there is absolutely no remedy must also be very small (egregious mental and physical disabilities or deformaties being about the only ones I can really think of).
In any case, I'm very interested to know what you all think. Which is true (or true 'est')? Is it even possible to escape Inceldom? Are those who have Ascended or hope to Ascend Fakecels or Volcels? For Truecels, which are the 'true' conditions under which the Blackpill exclusively applies, and for which it is truly over. When can one say that there is literally zero percent chance of escape whilst still being 100% intellectually honest?
**For context, I'm a 37 year old virgin. White, 5'5, small frame, 100 lbs, bad skin, bugged out eyes with with huge bags under them, big bulbous nose, week cheeks and recessed chin, bad skin with alopecia, abysmal confidence and high levels of social anxiety. But currently I still seem to believe that escape is at least 'theoretically' possible.**