Blackpill Monk
NON-NT AND HATED BY EVERYONE
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2023
- Posts
- 11,546
- Online time
- 8h 50m
Btw welcome back after a long time
Both . Both is good. Although im only really racist against indians and mewslims ,niggers and jewsI used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.
Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.
The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
Why? I'd rather be poor in Afghanistan than Middle class in the west, you would tooJust 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark.
No DNA is really not a big deal, and also, why do you care about what damage is done to civilization?DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are.
Isn't that a good thing? I hope more third worlders come to the west to rape white women, I want nothing more.One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.
Ok and? We're incels, we side with who gets mogged, not the mogger, stop the chadworship tiktokcel. I will always side with the incel over the chadAlso see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.
Explain how lolThe truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
Stop mixing jews and feminists, the jews are based, they let in all the Somalis that rape white womenRemember for every misogynistic arab invention, there are like 10 feminist kike inventions.
only temporarily. will go back to twitter in a bit and come back after a yearHOLY SHIT YOU'RE BACK POSTING AGAIN!
yuprace is absolutely inescapable, while gender just is what it is. To me I think about racial warfare and about how race affects everything more than gender. Women are just a subfaction of different races
this tooA rando bitch ain't gonna stab you on the street for fun.
i would not prefer to be poor in Afghanistan over living in feminist sweden. my resenentment towards women reduced with age after doing more critical thinking and analysis. Also visiting third world shitholes first hand, teaches you lessons that no internet theory does. You will see low IQ filthy unhygenic beggars, low IQ religious tards, all types of disgusting sewage on ground. awful smells etc. A far worse fate to live there than being incel in aggregateWhy? I'd rather be poor in Afghanistan than Middle class in the west, you would too
No DNA is really not a big deal, and also, why do you care about what damage is done to civilization?
Isn't that a good thing? I hope more third worlders come to the west to rape white women, I want nothing more.
Ok and? We're incels, we side with who gets mogged, not the mogger, stop the chadworship tiktokcel. I will always side with the incel over the chad
Explain how lol
i have been threatened with stabbing by black men at least 5 times now. two even broke on to my property at one point. very vile race. closest to spawn of satanA rando bitch ain't gonna stab you on the street for fun.
Cherrypicking. Beautiful white women get together with handsome white men or at best chads from other races.Seeing how filthy ghetto niggers are able to get beautiful white women while I as a white man can't even get a lower tier Becky. I'm more racist. I hate niggers who get with white and asian women.
I’m more misogynistic definitely
You're a cuck for supporting eugenics and abortion(feminism). Not based at all. There's a nonviolent way to increase the sex ratio:The foid problem doesn't stem from them having rights, refusing to enforce eugenics would not solve the problem either.
I can tell you what the problem was which was Artifically accelerated hypergamy, it's foids who endeavour towards a smaller group of men out of their own free will to do so.
Foids have set impossible standards and other conditions that are inaccessible for us to meet. I've said everyone including those whiteknights, and foids.
If you don't hate foids and if you do not think our lives as KHHV social outcasts weren't additionally caused by them then you must be taught a lesson by the sword.
incels.is
I hope more third worlders come to the west to rape white women, I want nothing more
@Satan thoughts?i have been threatened with stabbing by black men at least 5 times now. two even broke on to my property at one point. very vile race. closest to spawn of satan
AgreedI've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization.
I’m more misogynistic definitely
Cucked if you hate a nigger more than a foidI used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.
Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.
The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
@DarkStar @Blackpill Monk @Sewer Stomper what a cucked thing to vote forI used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.
Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.
The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
More misogynistic for sure, even though I'm a massive racist. The fact of the matter is, while I have my opinions of racial groups, I can still make exceptions for individuals, and have people of all races I'm cool with on here. There isn't a single woman I'm "cool with" on that level, and there never will be one, because I don't believe in such a thing as a "good woman"
Because that is a moral wrong, and what good is a society that cannot even grant its persons the right of life? In truth, the solution is not to reduce the female-male ratio, but to enforce monogamy and to promote certain cultural, religious, and legal values.cucked men refused to actually abort male fetuses in mass to maintain such ratio
It seems to me that the problem with your question is that it’s overly reductionist, and you are also conflating correlation with causation. Civilizational decay doesn’t stem from one biological variable but from a series of systemic incentives and value shifts. Feminism, for instance, didn’t arise from genetics; it arose from abundance, moral decay, and the erosion of masculine structure.I used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.
Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.
The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
More misogynistic. There's men of all races I've gotten along with, never the case with a hole. I genuinely hate women.
I really dunno man. Unless you are only talking about North/Western Europe, then gender-equal inheritance, for example, was reasonably common in Europe throughout the Middle Ages, with women inheriting anyway even in areas where it wasn't if there were no male heirs. We have analyses of medieval documents showing that 28% of wills in medieval Pisa had daughters as universal heiresses, for example. It was only in the early modern period as male intrasexual competition became more fierce that it started to be more sons-only, and even then only really in the Western part. Russia, Hungary, and I think Poland-Lithuania as well (at least partly), kept it gender-neutral, at least among the commoners.I'm sorry but this is a bs claim, and additionally a poor way to try and prove said claim. Whites only started to afford more rights to women than ethnics did in the 1800s, prior to that Europeans were more misogynistic, not less. Basing your conclusion on the raw number of female rulers in each society just doesn't work because:
incels.is
I get what you mean, but personally, I believe that like most other things, the witch trials have been exaggerated by modern feminists, and if monarchs don't count, then I'd say random people killed in rare cases of witch-hunting either for others to gain their property or for being societal outcasts (and male in 20% of cases) shouldn't either ngl.Monarchs are inherently exceptional individuals, not representative of the average person of their sex.
while whites like Protestant Anglos were busy making BBQs of foids over witchcraft accusations.
Neither, i'm misanthropic.
I figure it's why we're crafting our own culture here on isPeople are people, but some cultures are indeed better than others.
We could only allow femoid immigration, but we should simultaneously take away the right to vote. Women are more likely to vote for the left, so we need to take their right to vote. It'd be problematic to increase the number who vote for Democratic Party.men are to blame for the foid problem to begin with. who granted women rights? men. who refused to enforce eugenics? men once again. who decided to keep the sex ratio of male to female, 1:1? men again.
if male:female sex ratio was 1:1.5, inceldom rates would be considerably reduced. but cucked men refused to actually abort male fetuses in mass to maintain such ratio. basic economics, if higher demand and lower supply, issues would be reduced. other men have failed us more than women ever have.
incels.is
I meant to make this reply to @Transcended TrucelYou're a cuck for supporting eugenics and abortion(feminism). Not based at all. There's a nonviolent way to increase the sex ratio:
![]()
The Age of Consent Should Be 40
The AOC(age of consent) for males should be 40 and for females it should be 18. This would mean there's less competition for women. This would be like living in a country with a big female-to-male sex ratio. Sure, the male male AOC can be something else like 50 or 60 or I guess 30. 50 or 60...incels.is
It seems to me that the problem with your question is that it’s overly reductionist, and you are also conflating correlation with causation. Civilizational decay doesn’t stem from one biological variable but from a series of systemic incentives and value shifts. Feminism, for instance, didn’t arise from genetics; it arose from abundance, moral decay, and the erosion of masculine structure.
If I had to say, however, then misogyny is the more foundational stance, for female nature is the root cause of the decay that allows all the secondary problems, including racial and cultural collapse, to occur in the first place. You can have a monoethnic state and still watch it collapse under female liberation; look at any modern Western nation.
You are also presupposing a radically biologically essentialist view in regard to race, and while I am certain genetics influence many factors to some degree, they simply do not explain the vast chasm between the races, which is, in fact, significantly culturally and environmentally dependent — some may argue more so than genetics. Of course, one could argue that certain cultures and values emerge as a result of certain genetic makeups, but you are veering into highly speculative, pseudoscientific views about race, which is erroneous when discussing a multivariable issue wherein plenty of factors such as climate, resource abundance, religion, nutrition, and even simple luck can significantly affect outcomes. From a certain perspective, all of this may seem irrelevant, as it doesn’t change the massive difference between the races, but it is an important clarification as far as I am concerned.
Insofar as the Western nations that you mentioned go, as well as how they compare to Arab ones — the difference in advancement is unlikely to be primarily because of their views on women or their policies regarding them. I implore you to consider the fact that the Western nations you mention were once just as misogynistic — arguably more so — than those Arab ones, and their religious foundations are far superior to those of Arabs, for multiple reasons. Those secular Western nations — that preach feminism and nonsensical ideas of egalitarianism, as well as absurd secular ideologies — are largely successful because they enjoy borrowed religious capital from past values and because of the enlightenment period they had; it doesn't have much to do with their views about women, but said views are a necessary backbone. The observable reality is that once the borrowed capital fully drains, the true detrimental effects of the erosion of previous values will reveal itself, and as far as I am concerned — this demonstrates that misogyny, or lack thereof, is a significantly more critical factor to sustaining a healthy society; however, as I previously said, there are many more factors that should be considered in this equation.
It would also be wise to simply observe history, which demonstrates that almost any race can sustain a successful civilization, yet not a single one of those successful civilizations emphasized values of egalitarianism — they were all patriarchal, whereas societies that granted females more rights than necessary simply failed.





