Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Are you more misogynistic or more racist?

  • Thread starter Transcended Trucel
  • Start date

Are you more racist than misogynistic?


  • Total voters
    101
Btw welcome back after a long time
 
race is absolutely inescapable, while gender just is what it is. To me I think about racial warfare and about how race affects everything more than gender. Women are just a subfaction of different races
 
Contain everyone who voted yes in the Politics, Philosophy & Religion subforum and bar them from using any other subforum. Because all most of them will do is write down mountains of paragraphs while engaged in racial arguments in threads and derail them.
 
Much more misogynistic than I could ever be racist.

I am not even that racist.

Foids, simps and cucks are the real problem.
 
I used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.

Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.

The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
Both . Both is good. Although im only really racist against indians and mewslims ,niggers and jews
 
A rando bitch ain't gonna stab you on the street for fun.
 
Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark.
Why? I'd rather be poor in Afghanistan than Middle class in the west, you would too
DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are.
No DNA is really not a big deal, and also, why do you care about what damage is done to civilization?
One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.
Isn't that a good thing? I hope more third worlders come to the west to rape white women, I want nothing more.
Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.
Ok and? We're incels, we side with who gets mogged, not the mogger, stop the chadworship tiktokcel. I will always side with the incel over the chad
The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
Explain how lol
 
Remember for every misogynistic arab invention, there are like 10 feminist kike inventions.
Stop mixing jews and feminists, the jews are based, they let in all the Somalis that rape white women
 
Seeing how filthy ghetto niggers are able to get beautiful white women while I as a white man can't even get a lower tier Becky. I'm more racist. I hate niggers who get with white and asian women.
 
HOLY SHIT YOU'RE BACK POSTING AGAIN!
only temporarily. will go back to twitter in a bit and come back after a year
race is absolutely inescapable, while gender just is what it is. To me I think about racial warfare and about how race affects everything more than gender. Women are just a subfaction of different races
yup
A rando bitch ain't gonna stab you on the street for fun.
this too
Why? I'd rather be poor in Afghanistan than Middle class in the west, you would too

No DNA is really not a big deal, and also, why do you care about what damage is done to civilization?

Isn't that a good thing? I hope more third worlders come to the west to rape white women, I want nothing more.

Ok and? We're incels, we side with who gets mogged, not the mogger, stop the chadworship tiktokcel. I will always side with the incel over the chad

Explain how lol
i would not prefer to be poor in Afghanistan over living in feminist sweden. my resenentment towards women reduced with age after doing more critical thinking and analysis. Also visiting third world shitholes first hand, teaches you lessons that no internet theory does. You will see low IQ filthy unhygenic beggars, low IQ religious tards, all types of disgusting sewage on ground. awful smells etc. A far worse fate to live there than being incel in aggregate
 
A rando bitch ain't gonna stab you on the street for fun.
i have been threatened with stabbing by black men at least 5 times now. two even broke on to my property at one point. very vile race. closest to spawn of satan
 
Seeing how filthy ghetto niggers are able to get beautiful white women while I as a white man can't even get a lower tier Becky. I'm more racist. I hate niggers who get with white and asian women.
Cherrypicking. Beautiful white women get together with handsome white men or at best chads from other races.
 
those who voted more racist are dumb. imagine a perfect aryan society and you still end up being sub5 you would still hate women more
 
Norway and Denmark unrionically used to be shitholes not too long ago, actually. Especially norway was poor and unorganized as a whole. This only changed recently due to the oil and getting heavily favoured by the all-lies (Marshall-Plan, getting fishing fields ect ect). Very similar story to saudi-arabia.
 
The arabs is what 1400 years of inbreeding does to you. Africa is just the easy-mode of survival and the society has adapted to that. If you look at africans and arabs, you can see that the arabs are short and weak while africans are tall and healthy.
 
I am more racist. These days I ignore all the foids but I can’t ignore the nigger.
 
I don’t know nigger I’m just a pattern recognizer and a Noticer
 
The foid problem doesn't stem from them having rights, refusing to enforce eugenics would not solve the problem either.
I can tell you what the problem was which was Artifically accelerated hypergamy, it's foids who endeavour towards a smaller group of men out of their own free will to do so.

Foids have set impossible standards and other conditions that are inaccessible for us to meet. I've said everyone including those whiteknights, and foids.
If you don't hate foids and if you do not think our lives as KHHV social outcasts weren't additionally caused by them then you must be taught a lesson by the sword.
You're a cuck for supporting eugenics and abortion(feminism). Not based at all. There's a nonviolent way to increase the sex ratio:

 
Last edited:
misogyny doesn’t exist, women aren’t this oppressed, marginalised group
 
More misogynistic
 
I hope more third worlders come to the west to rape white women, I want nothing more

I love watching Somali filth raping white whores and shooting normies for disrespecting them.

The Somalis that gang raped a foid in a churchyard in England are the noble savages doing what they must.
 
i have been threatened with stabbing by black men at least 5 times now. two even broke on to my property at one point. very vile race. closest to spawn of satan
@Satan thoughts?
 
Good to see you brocel
 
I used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.

Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.

The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
Cucked if you hate a nigger more than a foid
 
I used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.

Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.

The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
@DarkStar @Blackpill Monk @Sewer Stomper what a cucked thing to vote for
 
More misogynistic for sure, even though I'm a massive racist. The fact of the matter is, while I have my opinions of racial groups, I can still make exceptions for individuals, and have people of all races I'm cool with on here. There isn't a single woman I'm "cool with" on that level, and there never will be one, because I don't believe in such a thing as a "good woman"
 
cucked men refused to actually abort male fetuses in mass to maintain such ratio
Because that is a moral wrong, and what good is a society that cannot even grant its persons the right of life? In truth, the solution is not to reduce the female-male ratio, but to enforce monogamy and to promote certain cultural, religious, and legal values.
 
I used to be more misogynistic than racist but after living life and traveling. I've come to conclude race is more key than misogyny for a prosperous civilization. Just 'based' afghanistan which is a broke disgusting worthless third world shithole vs feminist ran Norway/Denmark. This is one of of the things I noticed as became an older incel. Garbage vile racial DNA is far more damaging to civilization than females are. One thing is true though that women vote in favor of importing these vile third world scum to first world nations and ruining them.

Also see muh 'based" Arabs vs considerably more feminist Israelis mogging the fuck out of them.

The truth is ignoring inceldom and male satisfaction. Racially inferior DNA is substantially more damaging to civilizational progress than Feminism.
It seems to me that the problem with your question is that it’s overly reductionist, and you are also conflating correlation with causation. Civilizational decay doesn’t stem from one biological variable but from a series of systemic incentives and value shifts. Feminism, for instance, didn’t arise from genetics; it arose from abundance, moral decay, and the erosion of masculine structure.

If I had to say, however, then misogyny is the more foundational stance, for female nature is the root cause of the decay that allows all the secondary problems, including racial and cultural collapse, to occur in the first place. You can have a monoethnic state and still watch it collapse under female liberation; look at any modern Western nation.

You are also presupposing a radically biologically essentialist view in regard to race, and while I am certain genetics influence many factors to some degree, they simply do not explain the vast chasm between the races, which is, in fact, significantly culturally and environmentally dependent — some may argue more so than genetics. Of course, one could argue that certain cultures and values emerge as a result of certain genetic makeups, but you are veering into highly speculative, pseudoscientific views about race, which is erroneous when discussing a multivariable issue wherein plenty of factors such as climate, resource abundance, religion, nutrition, and even simple luck can significantly affect outcomes. From a certain perspective, all of this may seem irrelevant, as it doesn’t change the massive difference between the races, but it is an important clarification as far as I am concerned.

Insofar as the Western nations that you mentioned go, as well as how they compare to Arab ones — the difference in advancement is unlikely to be primarily because of their views on women or their policies regarding them. I implore you to consider the fact that the Western nations you mention were once just as misogynistic — arguably more so — than those Arab ones, and their religious foundations are far superior to those of Arabs, for multiple reasons. Those secular Western nations — that preach feminism and nonsensical ideas of egalitarianism, as well as absurd secular ideologies — are largely successful because they enjoy borrowed religious capital from past values and because of the enlightenment period they had; it doesn't have much to do with their views about women, but said views are a necessary backbone. The observable reality is that once the borrowed capital fully drains, the true detrimental effects of the erosion of previous values will reveal itself, and as far as I am concerned — this demonstrates that misogyny, or lack thereof, is a significantly more critical factor to sustaining a healthy society; however, as I previously said, there are many more factors that should be considered in this equation.

It would also be wise to simply observe history, which demonstrates that almost any race can sustain a successful civilization, yet not a single one of those successful civilizations emphasized values of egalitarianism — they were all patriarchal, whereas societies that granted females more rights than necessary simply failed.
 
Im both. I thank every single God that I live in an area with zero immigrants, no gypsies and no junkies. I only see immigrants when I go to university thrice a week. What comes to misoginy: I know female nature so that makes a misogynist
 
my misogyny bc its more based in experience i guess, also i think men all have the potential to be good functioning people, women dont have that same level of brain functioning and need outside guidance to make any personal change
 
Probably the most difficult question I’ve ever been asked
 
Neither, i'm misanthropic.
 
Dunno, I'd say I'm just a misanthrope who notices patterns and tries to see things how they actually are.

I'm sorry but this is a bs claim, and additionally a poor way to try and prove said claim. Whites only started to afford more rights to women than ethnics did in the 1800s, prior to that Europeans were more misogynistic, not less. Basing your conclusion on the raw number of female rulers in each society just doesn't work because:
I really dunno man. Unless you are only talking about North/Western Europe, then gender-equal inheritance, for example, was reasonably common in Europe throughout the Middle Ages, with women inheriting anyway even in areas where it wasn't if there were no male heirs. We have analyses of medieval documents showing that 28% of wills in medieval Pisa had daughters as universal heiresses, for example. It was only in the early modern period as male intrasexual competition became more fierce that it started to be more sons-only, and even then only really in the Western part. Russia, Hungary, and I think Poland-Lithuania as well (at least partly), kept it gender-neutral, at least among the commoners.

And even in Western Europe after inheritance became much more of a sons thing while women had dowries, their dowries were commonly larger than their brothers' inheritances.


Monarchs are inherently exceptional individuals, not representative of the average person of their sex.
while whites like Protestant Anglos were busy making BBQs of foids over witchcraft accusations.
I get what you mean, but personally, I believe that like most other things, the witch trials have been exaggerated by modern feminists, and if monarchs don't count, then I'd say random people killed in rare cases of witch-hunting either for others to gain their property or for being societal outcasts (and male in 20% of cases) shouldn't either ngl.

Neither, i'm misanthropic.
 
I'm not racist at all but I hate women 100000000000%.
 
I am "neutral" rather towards women as I have been on the receiving end of hatred by both men and women in relatively-equal amounts and at this point I am mostly worn out and sad over how things have turned out for me rather than angry.

As for being "racist" it is not that I think that any particular race of people is better than any other, but I do not think that all cultures are equal by a long shot.

Taking blacks as an example, look at how many black activists during the late 19th and up until the mid-20th century advocated for the importance of education, rationality, and literacy in terms of being the pathway for equality. However, when "ghetto" culture coalesced in the 1970's and onwards, it basically undid a lot of the positive milestones that were accomplished for blacks before then and now it continues to sabotage them.

Taking another example, the Arabic world used to be a mecca of enlightenment and rationality during the Middle-Ages. Now, because of centuries of wars and the poverty that they have caused, extreme forms of Islam now dominate many areas of this part of the world and it has rendered the population in these areas to be a bunch of backwards religious degenerates.

People are people, but some cultures are indeed better than others.
 
I hate the entirety of JEWmanity yes
 
I will always feel more empathy towards another man than towards a foid (unless she lets me hit and is actually based but there's more chances of finding gold in my backyard) so definitely more misogynistic.
Also why would I care about western nations becoming third world shitholes if I don't get to ascend anyway.
 
Last edited:
I hate everyone that isn't heterosexual White males. Preferably Norse Pagan.
 
men are to blame for the foid problem to begin with. who granted women rights? men. who refused to enforce eugenics? men once again. who decided to keep the sex ratio of male to female, 1:1? men again.
if male:female sex ratio was 1:1.5, inceldom rates would be considerably reduced. but cucked men refused to actually abort male fetuses in mass to maintain such ratio. basic economics, if higher demand and lower supply, issues would be reduced. other men have failed us more than women ever have.
We could only allow femoid immigration, but we should simultaneously take away the right to vote. Women are more likely to vote for the left, so we need to take their right to vote. It'd be problematic to increase the number who vote for Democratic Party.

Perhaps we can also increase the sex ratio by incentivizing men to leave the country. It's like when Ron Unz proposed offering money for immigrants to leave the country: "The obvious solution, both humane and highly cost-effective, would be for the government to offer immigrants extremely generous financial relocation packages if they return home to their own countries. A tax-free cash payment perhaps as high as $5,000 or even $10,000 per adult plus a much smaller sum per minor child, together with free travel arrangements, would constitute an enormously attractive offer, probably being much more than they had managed to accumulate during many years of difficult low-wage labor." Meir Kahane proposed a similar idea for getting rid of Palestinians from Israel. I don't know how effective this idea is or where we'll send these men to.

I think I've already talked about this before men should be incentivized to have vasectomies. Childless men should be given $50,000 to get a vasectomy. Women want children, so this will reduce these men's SMV. Tubal ligation should be banned since women should still have children. We can also give reduced prison sentences to those who get sterilized. Since men are are the majority of prisoners, this can be done for both genders though ideally women should be excluded from this.

 
You're a cuck for supporting eugenics and abortion(feminism). Not based at all. There's a nonviolent way to increase the sex ratio:

I meant to make this reply to @Transcended Trucel
 
It seems to me that the problem with your question is that it’s overly reductionist, and you are also conflating correlation with causation. Civilizational decay doesn’t stem from one biological variable but from a series of systemic incentives and value shifts. Feminism, for instance, didn’t arise from genetics; it arose from abundance, moral decay, and the erosion of masculine structure.

If I had to say, however, then misogyny is the more foundational stance, for female nature is the root cause of the decay that allows all the secondary problems, including racial and cultural collapse, to occur in the first place. You can have a monoethnic state and still watch it collapse under female liberation; look at any modern Western nation.

You are also presupposing a radically biologically essentialist view in regard to race, and while I am certain genetics influence many factors to some degree, they simply do not explain the vast chasm between the races, which is, in fact, significantly culturally and environmentally dependent — some may argue more so than genetics. Of course, one could argue that certain cultures and values emerge as a result of certain genetic makeups, but you are veering into highly speculative, pseudoscientific views about race, which is erroneous when discussing a multivariable issue wherein plenty of factors such as climate, resource abundance, religion, nutrition, and even simple luck can significantly affect outcomes. From a certain perspective, all of this may seem irrelevant, as it doesn’t change the massive difference between the races, but it is an important clarification as far as I am concerned.

Insofar as the Western nations that you mentioned go, as well as how they compare to Arab ones — the difference in advancement is unlikely to be primarily because of their views on women or their policies regarding them. I implore you to consider the fact that the Western nations you mention were once just as misogynistic — arguably more so — than those Arab ones, and their religious foundations are far superior to those of Arabs, for multiple reasons. Those secular Western nations — that preach feminism and nonsensical ideas of egalitarianism, as well as absurd secular ideologies — are largely successful because they enjoy borrowed religious capital from past values and because of the enlightenment period they had; it doesn't have much to do with their views about women, but said views are a necessary backbone. The observable reality is that once the borrowed capital fully drains, the true detrimental effects of the erosion of previous values will reveal itself, and as far as I am concerned — this demonstrates that misogyny, or lack thereof, is a significantly more critical factor to sustaining a healthy society; however, as I previously said, there are many more factors that should be considered in this equation.

It would also be wise to simply observe history, which demonstrates that almost any race can sustain a successful civilization, yet not a single one of those successful civilizations emphasized values of egalitarianism — they were all patriarchal, whereas societies that granted females more rights than necessary simply failed.
:yes: :yes: :yes:

I might add,
1. Ironically in a number of Arab countries foids outnumber men in STEM.
2. Finland, a feminist first world, ranks incredibly in the male suicide rate.

Reality is much stranger than the certain blackpill pseudoscience we force on the reality to understand (control) it.
Most blackpillers, mostly the self-hating ones, always get this cause and effect in a twist.
Countries wouldn't automatically start to prosper by going turbo-feminist. In actuality, the spread of feminism poison in the 21st century in the Asian and subcontinent countries have worsened their state, majorly shifting the focus from economic growth to social faggotry which has led to extreme political divisions. I don't think racial or left-right division would be this extreme without foids' having social and political agency.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

SlayerSlayer
Replies
21
Views
919
SlayerSlayer
SlayerSlayer
Qech__
Replies
7
Views
691
Qech__
Qech__

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top