Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Are women proof democracy doesn't work?

Which of the fallowing is the least evil/bad?

  • Dictatorship

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Democracy where only men can vote

    Votes: 18 66.7%
  • Democracy

    Votes: 1 3.7%

  • Total voters
    27
Disillusioned

Disillusioned

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 18, 2018
Posts
1,163
The voters are fucking retards and a large part of the problem is that there are too many voters who are too ignorant to understand what is good for them with women being the go to example of how self-destructive and greedy the voters can be. However despite what some here may say the problem would not go away by simply taking away the female right to vote. Plato complained about voters only voting for the party offering the most entitlements even thousands of years ago when women had no rights, so clearly this problem would not just vanish by taking away women's rights. But I would argue that women are the single best example of how self-defeating democracy ultimately is in the long run and how only rich countries can afford them.
 
Men votes will cater to women anyways because they're massive cucks, so a blackpilled dictator is needed.
 
Democracy is proof democracy doesn't work. It realies too much on human kindness, we are all animals and should be controlled by a benevolent leader.
 
Rights to men, but not for women. Democracy can work if the right people can vote. There should be tests before one (MEN) can vote.
 
A strong dictator is much better than a shitty democracy.
 
Democracy is proof democracy doesn't work. It realies too much on human kindness, we are all animals and should be controlled by a benevolent leader.

There are no benevolent leaders. Even the likes of Hitler which the alt-right glorifies would probably have just exterminated most Germans if robots had existed at the time, since that would have fit within his socially darwinistic view of the world.
 
There are no benevolent leaders. Even the likes of Hitler which the alt-right glorifies would probably have just exterminated most Germans if robots had existed at the time, since that would have fit within his socially darwinistic view of the world.
I'm not the type of person to believe in good or bad but there are people who wouls benefit a nation they lead more than others.
 
Dictatorship and take all human rights away from foids. After seeing how they act, they totally deserve it
 
A republic with required testing for voting eligibility is ideal.
 
Only people who have contributed and made the nation stro]ng should be allowed to vote. The ones that have an interest in the country or the educated types. Common NPC can vote but their vote is not weighted heavily like the scientists/soilders/land owners
Dictatorship and take all human rights away from foids. After seeing how they act, they totally deserve it
 
Sexual Marxism.
 
Democracy where only men with some knowledge about politics are able to vote. Some kind of exam should be mandatory before voting. What would the exam be like, I don't know.
 
The Chinese hierarchical election system seems superior to Western representative democracy in this day and age tbh, the only issue being that down-top hierarchical levelled Marxist-Leninist governments are infested with soulless bureaucrats. Maybe, at the end of the day, a frigid, overbearing system like that is what we need to wage total war against cuckoldry. After all, the last effective resistance to liberalism in the western world was made by bureaucratic (and also autocratic with elements of overbearing bureaucracy, such as Nazi Germany) single-party states.

China is a chink ant hellhole but their government teaches young boys masculine virtues, bans degenerate shit like rap, hates gays and wants to expand their race's reach overseas. Imagine if the West, which had a far less cancerous culture than both China and what it has now just a few generations ago, were to start emulating China's form of government. We would start colonising the solar system. We could reduce government payments for single mothers and other useless eater scumbags enough to dedicate funding to stuff like a nuclear fusion research programs without anybody batting an eye because governments would no longer be required to promise boosted welfare to their subhuman poorfag voters every few years as a form of political bribery.

Compare how much Central American welfare recipients in the USA get to the USA's nuclear fusion program budget, even diverting a tenth of their funding to nuclear fusion could increase research many times and help develop something that would be extremely useful but will not be profitable for the market to develop for many decades.

To make sure it doesn't become a cucked police state UK on steroids, it should be made so that only men are able to participate in the political process, and that only men who have served in the military or high-tier STEM/law careers should be eligible for higher or executive positions.
 
Men only democracy is the best of both worlds. Imagine if a female somehow became dictator. Her madness would be short lived, but it would be horrible.
 
To answer the title, yes.
Removing women's right to vote would be the best thing that can happen politically. Most people are npcs(especially foids) so their opinion is always the popular one.
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
46
Views
606
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
CosmicJoke
Replies
65
Views
869
DarkStar
DarkStar
Grodd
Replies
22
Views
602
Babylon Oh Babalyon
Babylon Oh Babalyon
erenyeager
Replies
35
Views
706
Seahorsecel
Seahorsecel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top