PUAs, when dealing with the more unattractive members of their clientele, sometimes advance the "just approach 10,000 girls, bro" (JATTGB) theory, which is sort of the 
version of the adage "you have to put yourself out there". Other than the absurdly difficult logistics involved in this theory, I've been wondering whether there's something to it. (Not saying it's correct, necessarily.)
Could it be that we incels on the whole are perhaps too risk- and pain-averse to play the "numbers game" that is modern dating? Those of us who have already taken the know that almost all foids are chasing after Chad, and that the avenues for circumventing this one-sided female sexual strategy (such as betabuxxing) have become increasingly hard to implement. It stands to reason, then, that in order to find the rare unicorns one has to sift through a very large number of foids. (Assuming that such unicorns do indeed exist, and that they are distributed both randomly and uniformly among the general population.
It's obvious to anyone who has experienced rejection that it is an emotionally painful experience. In fact, it activates much the same regions in the brain as those that become active upon the person experiencing physical pain. Prolonged and repeated pain sensations can cause either of two reactions: numbness, or to the contrary heightened sensitivity to the pain signal. Most incels, is my impression, tend to exhibit the latter reaction, which may lead to more or less pronounced withdrawal from social situations involving foids.
Should we perhaps focus on ways to ensure that the pain signal of rejection induces numbness instead of heightened sensitivity? I realize this may very well be to a large extent a matter of neuro-chemical machinery hardwired into the individual. But to the extent that it isn't (and I don't know how large that extent is, unfortunately), it may be an area of research well worth pursuing, for at least some of us. Anything that enables us to play an extremely prolonged and extended version of the numbers game of dating without too much emotional discomfort is, in my view, a potential boon to us incels.
version of the adage "you have to put yourself out there". Other than the absurdly difficult logistics involved in this theory, I've been wondering whether there's something to it. (Not saying it's correct, necessarily.)Could it be that we incels on the whole are perhaps too risk- and pain-averse to play the "numbers game" that is modern dating? Those of us who have already taken the
know that almost all foids are chasing after Chad, and that the avenues for circumventing this one-sided female sexual strategy (such as betabuxxing) have become increasingly hard to implement. It stands to reason, then, that in order to find the rare unicorns one has to sift through a very large number of foids. (Assuming that such unicorns do indeed exist, and that they are distributed both randomly and uniformly among the general population.It's obvious to anyone who has experienced rejection that it is an emotionally painful experience. In fact, it activates much the same regions in the brain as those that become active upon the person experiencing physical pain. Prolonged and repeated pain sensations can cause either of two reactions: numbness, or to the contrary heightened sensitivity to the pain signal. Most incels, is my impression, tend to exhibit the latter reaction, which may lead to more or less pronounced withdrawal from social situations involving foids.
Should we perhaps focus on ways to ensure that the pain signal of rejection induces numbness instead of heightened sensitivity? I realize this may very well be to a large extent a matter of neuro-chemical machinery hardwired into the individual. But to the extent that it isn't (and I don't know how large that extent is, unfortunately), it may be an area of research well worth pursuing, for at least some of us. Anything that enables us to play an extremely prolonged and extended version of the numbers game of dating without too much emotional discomfort is, in my view, a potential boon to us incels.
Last edited:
