Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Are Sexually Attractive Features Correlated with Survivability?

YBP Yxngcel

YBP Yxngcel

Neurodivergent
★★★
Joined
Feb 2, 2022
Posts
2,202
The sexual characteristics that chad has, are they cor[UWSL]related to survivability? For example; hunter eyes, Jawline,Canthal tilt etc. [/UWSL]

Do such traits help in surviving in a rainforest? Or protecting the body?
 
No, it is a common lie that foids use to fuck with good-looking men.
All top athletes, actors, scientists, other high-tier professionals: they do not really have model-tier looks.
 
No, it is a common lie that foids use to fuck with good-looking men.
All top athletes, actors, scientists, other high-tier professionals: they do not really have model-tier looks.
What the fuck??? How can you call yourself blackpilled if you don't even believe in the existence of sexual selection??? Where does sexual attraction even come from then??????
 
The sexual characteristics that chad has, are they cor[UWSL]related to survivability? For example; hunter eyes, Jawline,Canthal tilt etc. [/UWSL]

Do such traits help in surviving in a rainforest? Or protecting the body?
answer: yes
 
No, it is a common lie that foids use to fuck with good-looking men.
All top athletes, actors, scientists, other high-tier professionals: they do not really have model-tier looks.
:bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
 
Ok, why is canthal tilt important? Why is eye orbits, Midface etc important in survival?
The human brain needs to be able to analyze faces. That's very important.
 
The sexual characteristics that chad has, are they cor[UWSL]related to survivability? For example; hunter eyes, Jawline,Canthal tilt etc. [/UWSL]

Do such traits help in surviving in a rainforest? Or protecting the body?
No
 
What the fuck??? How can you call yourself blackpilled if you don't even believe in the existence of sexual selection??? Where does sexual attraction even come from then??????
Sexual selection isn't based on natural selection. See Fisherian runaway effect where females end select inferior genes for males and pass it on in birds etc and can happen in Humans since humans are also giving too much control to retarded people. Sexual attraction comes from many factors.
 
No cause big jaw didn't really protect from spear of ooga booga from another tribe
 
facial symmetry is linked to healthy early development, your immune system didnt have to use much energy fighting off infections etc
 
Sexual selection isn't based on natural selection. See Fisherian runaway effect where females end select inferior genes for males and pass it on in birds etc and can happen in Humans since humans are also giving too much control to retarded people. Sexual attraction comes from many factors.
Sexual selection doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be better than no sexual selection. The Fisherian runaway does exist sometimes, but species where sexual selection doesn't work will die out and stop existing. The forum is showcasing very low IQ behavior below this threat.
EVERY trait that is exhibited by most members of EVERY species is based on natural selection.
 
Last edited:
Sexual selection doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be better than no sexual selection. The Fisherian runaway does exist sometimes, but species where sexual selection doesn't work will die out and stop existing. The forum is showcasing very low IQ behavior below this threat.
The only selection that exists in a species where Males dominate is Natural selection. Fisherian runaway effect is seen mostly in species where males can't really Dominate or current Humans. Natural Selection>Sexual selection. That's one reason why making males dominant is also a great way to impart better genes, because men will fuck anyone. Hence every foid will get a chance. But if females dominate in a species which relies more on quality of offspring than quanity, then that species might not survive at all.
 
What the fuck??? How can you call yourself blackpilled if you don't even believe in the existence of sexual selection??? Where does sexual attraction even come from then??????
You’re getting sexual selection and natural selection mixed up. There is no survival ability increase from having a square jawline especially in the modern world it just means foids think you’re attractive lol. Survival ability stems from reproducing with men from families that don’t have a history of genetic diseases or disabilities
 
You’re getting sexual selection and natural selection mixed up. There is no survival ability increase from having a square jawline especially in the modern world it just means foids think you’re attractive lol. Survival ability stems from reproducing with men from families that don’t have a history of genetic diseases or disabilities
Then explain the existence of sexual attraction.
also maybe read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_selection
and stop coping.
 
The human brain needs to be able to analyze faces. That's very important.
I don't get it. Can't we analyze an unattractive face?
 
Then explain the existence of sexual attraction.
also maybe read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_selection
and stop coping.
Yes sexual selection is a mode of natural selection but you were talking about having genes that give you a higher chance of survival. What make dumb foids attracted to you does not mean you have a higher chance of survival. Do you honestly believe foids are intelligent enough to place what’s best for the survival of the species over what makes them wet? No of course not you’re actually acting a little cucked for giving these dumb cunts too much credit for thinking anything more than what makes them hot when they pick their partners.

I think there was a species of deer in Siberia that actually died out because the stupid female species of the deer kept selecting their mates based off antler length to the point where the antler evolved so long over time it pierced into the deer’s skull and killed them JFL

A foid would breed with a tall, good looking man from a family with a history of terminal cancer and risk passing that down to her children just because she was attracted to the dude does that sound like selecting for a better chance of survival to you?
 
I don't get it. Can't we analyze an unattractive face?
To reference your previous post, It's definitley harder to analyze faces that have shitty orbitals or unusual canthal tilt, yes. Jawlines are part of an average face, and being average is an indicator of genetic fitness, It's just that our jaws have become recessed after the industrial revolution changed what we eat. Some attractive traits might be runaway selection like the chin which doesn't really have a use apart from making the face look flatter.
 
Yes sexual selection is a mode of natural selection but you were talking about having genes that give you a higher chance of survival. What make dumb foids attracted to you does not mean you have a higher chance of survival. Do you honestly believe foids are intelligent enough to place what’s best for the survival of the species over what makes them wet? No of course not you’re actually acting a little cucked for giving these dumb cunts too much credit for thinking anything more than what makes them hot when they pick their partners.

I think there was a species of deer in Siberia that actually died out because the stupid female species of the deer kept selecting their mates based off antler length to the point where the antler evolved so long over time it pierced into the deer’s skull and killed them JFL

A foid would breed with a tall, good looking man from a family with a history of terminal cancer and risk passing that down to her children just because she was attracted to the dude does that sound like selecting for a better chance of survival to you?
I am not giving credit to anyone. I am just statig objectively true facts for the most part. sexual selection doesn't need a lot of intelligence, it's a very old biological mechanism, that basically existed since the existence of genders. Sexual attraction is mainly based on appearance, and can't tell if someone has a family with a history of cancer or whatever.

Some species die out because of sexual selection that's true, but that doesn't refute anything I said.
 
The only selection that exists in a species where Males dominate is Natural selection. Fisherian runaway effect is seen mostly in species where males can't really Dominate or current Humans. Natural Selection>Sexual selection. That's one reason why making males dominant is also a great way to impart better genes, because men will fuck anyone. Hence every foid will get a chance. But if females dominate in a species which relies more on quality of offspring than quanity, then that species might not survive at all.
The vast majority of species are very polygamous, where a huge part of the males never reproduces. (because there is zero reason as to why it shouldn't be like that) stop coping
 
All top athletes, actors, scientists, other high-tier professionals: they do not really have model-tier looks.
Cope. Top scientists are often moggers face wise and athletes are literally moggers. Actors? Jfl. Okay so they're not some 9/10 giga rare models... so?
 
my theory about this and I cannot be convinced otherwise, is that kikes through decades have programmed the public to see the traditional "chad" look as attractive so that they will breed more, because the "chad" facial characteristics are directly linked to a more easily subverted mind. Mental traits have a physical facial connection, and the ones that "chad" has are linked to easily mentally controlled. thats why kikes have engineered society over the course of the last 1,000 years or whatever to see those features as attractive, so that they will breed more, thus increasing the number of easily controllable people.

i dont really ever see anyone with this theory, but i believe its the most correct reason for where we are at
 
Go read a
The sexual characteristics that chad has, are they cor[UWSL]related to survivability? For example; hunter eyes, Jawline,Canthal tilt etc. [/UWSL]

Do such traits help in surviving in a rainforest? Or protecting the body?
Go read Biology book
 
No. Attractive features have nothing to do with survivability. This has been shown again and again in the animal kingdom, when the female is the one who selects potential mates(aka mother nature) it has been shown that some birds ended up developing too large tails because their females considered them attractive, what ended up happeningi is that while longer tails helped them mate easily. It also made them slower and thus more easy to kill by predators.

Some species of deer also grew up horns or whatever is called that were too big, for the same reasoning as the birds and ended up getting killed by their predators too. If you think about it, attractive features hardly give a man a better survivavility aspect. Blue eyes? Gives nothing, what's more is a detriment because strong sun can harm them easily. And you can apply it to any other attractive feature.

The correlation of attractiveness comes hand in hand with survivavility is a myth steemed from taller dudes where stronger and whatever not, where as we won all the fights we had because of our intellect not some dumb strenght. There's tons of stronger animals than us
 
Cope. Top scientists are often moggers face wise and athletes are literally moggers. Actors? Jfl. Okay so they're not some 9/10 giga rare models... so?
ofc they mog me to infinity, but it is not only looks that they posses
personally i`m jealous of those people, the intellect or the charisma or the athleticism - it is all amazing and brutal
 
T
No. Attractive features have nothing to do with survivability. This has been shown again and again in the animal kingdom, when the female is the one who selects potential mates(aka mother nature) it has been shown that some birds ended up developing too large tails because their females considered them attractive, what ended up happeningi is that while longer tails helped them mate easily. It also made them slower and thus more easy to kill by predators.

Some species of deer also grew up horns or whatever is called that were too big, for the same reasoning as the birds and ended up getting killed by their predators too. If you think about it, attractive features hardly give a man a better survivavility aspect. Blue eyes? Gives nothing, what's more is a detriment because strong sun can harm them easily. And you can apply it to any other attractive feature.

The correlation of attractiveness comes hand in hand with survivavility is a myth steemed from taller dudes where stronger and whatever not, where as we won all the fights we had because of our intellect not some dumb strenght. There's tons of stronger animals than us
True

I remember some documentary about female warthog selecting male with big horn and the next generation was being born with horns so big and long it was digging into their skulls :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelskek:
 
T

True

I remember some documentary about female warthog selecting male with big horn and the next generation was being born with horns so big and long it was digging into their skulls :feelshaha::feelshaha::feelskek:
Exactly i also saw that documentary, and you think. WTF is wrong with these deers that end up developing like that, and it was cause of the females lmao. Sexual selection is scary
 
It is important because looking good = looking healthy = offspring has higher chance of survival

Having recessed jaws, naso-labial folds, bug eyes, etc. all suggest bad bone support for your fat in the face. It shows that your genetic material is not as high quality as someone that has a nicly developed jaw, good hairline and no acne for example
 
The vast majority of species are very polygamous, where a huge part of the males never reproduces. (because there is zero reason as to why it shouldn't be like that) stop coping
Which vast number of species are you talking about. We are most closer to chimpanzees and in them everyone reproduces and rapes each other.
 
Caveman chad only
 
Exactly i also saw that documentary, and you think. WTF is wrong with these deers that end up developing like that, and it was cause of the females lmao. Sexual selection is scary
That's true. I guess some feature do come in handy in terms of health and survival l. But female sexual selection take it too far and fisherian runaway fuck everything up. This why female nature unchecked can fuck up an entire generation. Its the elites to blame tbh. (Smart Fuckers)
 
You’re getting sexual selection and natural selection mixed up. There is no survival ability increase from having a square jawline especially in the modern world it just means foids think you’re attractive lol. Survival ability stems from reproducing with men from families that don’t have a history of genetic diseases or disabilities
this
 
No, its useless.
 
The sexual characteristics that chad has, are they cor[UWSL]related to survivability? For example; hunter eyes, Jawline,Canthal tilt etc. [/UWSL]

Do such traits help in surviving in a rainforest? Or protecting the body?
I can't comment on particulars, but I reckon that most of the attractive features are signals of strong immune systems, healthy diets, and low mutational load (symmetry).

Likewise, weak immune system (signalled by several skin conditions), mutants (such as the spergs) and the undernourished are the least attractive.
 
Some, but not all.
 
No cause big jaw didn't really protect from spear of ooga booga from another tribe
it did help to chew things like meat (which was eaten RAW for a long time) and other things that most of the goyslop eating muricans here wouldn't be able to properly break into pieces. wider jaw = stronger muscles and better teeth accommodation = being able to eat more things and do it more efficiently = higher chances of survival

:blackpill:: attractive face and body features are objectively attractive and linked to desirable genetic makeup of the person; most incels are genetic dead ends
 
PRETTY BOYS WERE BEING RAPED BY OGRES BACK THEN
 
Absolutely not.
 

Similar threads

Mortis
Replies
53
Views
1K
DarkStarDown
DarkStarDown
EgyptianNiggerKANG
Replies
7
Views
260
uglyugly
uglyugly
NorthernWind
Replies
33
Views
816
Namtriz912
Namtriz912
Friezacel
Replies
46
Views
846
kay'
K

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top