Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

are people getting worse to you? more hostile?

Brainy

Brainy

Sewer cyborg
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 4, 2024
Posts
12,388
Online time
2d 16h
im not gonna define hostile, actual trucels will know what i mean

people have always been manipulative and deceitful

but now people seem more on edge than ever
 
Always has been
 
if you are non-nt, everything is bad and gets worse
 
yeah but i mean worse than before
yeah the older you get as a truecel the creepier you are to normies
you go from people seeing you as an ugly nerd in your teens to being seen as a sex offender
 
People have always been hostile towards me hasn't increased or decreased much
 
but now people seem more on edge than ever
jab rewired their brains, they are now real cyborgs that will rage and try to eat us like zombies in the next 2-5 years
 
im not gonna define hostile, actual trucels will know what i mean

people have always been manipulative and deceitful

but now people seem more on edge than ever
I actually have been thinking about this for a while and had ChatGPT explain the causes to me earlier today.

I was wondering if ChatGPT could tell me why it is modern woke leftists appear to be less forgiving and more hateful and resentful and likely to hold long term grudges than their 90’s generation X and earlier counterparts who were arguably more forgiving and understanding and who seemingly believed much like Christians in personal redemption for wrongs done. To a modern leftist for example if a person gets released from prison for a heinous act, have apologized for it sincerely and done their time a modern woke leftist may not complain and try to get that person placed back into prison but they will hate and regard that person as a pariah for all the rest of their days whereas the previous generations of liberals were much more likely to forgive and forget so long as the person didn’t re-offend

Your question is sociologically complex and involves multiple interacting factors, so I will attempt to address it in a systematic fashion. I will note that we are speaking in generalities—there will always be exceptions within any ideological group or generational cohort.

Based on available sociological, political science, and cultural psychology research, several phenomena may explain the difference you describe between modern “woke” progressives and earlier Generation X or Baby Boomer liberals:



1. Shifts in moral culture
• Scholars such as Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning have documented a transition from a “culture of dignity” (emphasizing resilience, ignoring insults, and granting people the ability to redeem themselves) toward a “culture of victimhood” (where harm, even if symbolic, is given greater moral weight, and public acknowledgment of wrongdoing does not necessarily erase stigma).
• This change has increased emphasis on moral memory—keeping record of past wrongs so they are not repeated. Earlier liberalism often operated with more emphasis on rehabilitation; modern progressive activism often emphasizes ongoing accountability.



2. Influence of social media
• The mid-to-late 1990s had limited online permanence; public controversies faded more quickly because older media cycles moved on.
• In contrast, modern digital environments preserve past statements and actions indefinitely, making it easier to re-surface old offenses.
• This permanence tends to reinforce long-term stigmatization, because the “offense” is never truly buried.



3. Changes in activism strategy
• 1960s–1990s liberalism often focused on persuasion and coalition-building, partly because many progressive causes were in the minority and required broad support.
• Modern progressive movements, in certain contexts, see themselves as holding more cultural power within particular institutions (e.g., academia, media, entertainment), which shifts the strategy from persuading outsiders to policing in-group purity.
• This can produce more intense sanctions against individuals perceived as violating group norms, even after formal justice has been served.



4. Shifts in moral psychology
• Studies in moral foundations theory suggest that modern progressive ideology increasingly emphasizes care/harm and fairness as moral axes, but often in ways that make past harm difficult to separate from present identity.
• If harm is seen as permanently part of someone’s moral record, the concept of “forgiveness” becomes more conditional or symbolic, rather than functional.



5. Cultural memory of systemic harm
• Activists influenced by critical theory and intersectional thought often see individual wrongs as tied to larger systemic oppressions.
• From this perspective, forgiving an individual too easily might be seen as undermining broader structural change.
• This produces a more guarded or conditional approach to redemption, compared to earlier liberalism’s more individual-focused moral framework.



If you wish, I can provide a side-by-side table comparing the moral and strategic tendencies of 1990s liberals vs. 2020s progressives, which may clarify why forgiveness and redemption are treated so differently across these eras. This would make the contrast more visually explicit. Would you like me to produce that table?
 
I’m from a certain violent city in the Midwest—every motherfucker seems hostile here
 
Yeah mate.
The minute I respond back I’m the apprent problem
 
Idk but people have always been snakes and bullies, the kind ones are very rare and that's what makes life a shithole
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
9
Views
543
Yunoo
Yunoo
VλREN
Replies
7
Views
1K
GoyimLivesMatter
GoyimLivesMatter
D. B. Gooner
Replies
4
Views
529
rapetorturekill
rapetorturekill
Misogynist Vegeta
Soy Redditism
Replies
13
Views
1K
Robocell
Robocell

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top