D
Last edited:
Blackpill Appeal to nature, evolution & "mother nature" is disingenuous & a non sequitur...
I
D
Journalists are lower than maggots.
His argument makes no sense. Mocking low tier men is good for evolution?
I remember evolution as being about reproductive success -- the right genes reproducing is good for evolution. Nothing to do with mocking and belittling.
So how does belittling low tier men do any evolutionary good?
I remember evolution as being about reproductive success -- the right genes reproducing is good for evolution. Nothing to do with mocking and belittling.
So how does belittling low tier men do any evolutionary good?
They only appeal to evolution and nature when it supports the views they already have. I mean, you could make arguments for rape, murder and paedophilia since they are "natural" and can be successful strategies for passing on genes.
What's really the difference between what this guy is arguing for and Nazi eugenics?
What's really the difference between what this guy is arguing for and Nazi eugenics?
: "Muh weemenz rights, you misogynist inkwell!!!!!"
Maybe, if more people gave jews a hard time for being so damned ugly, then they would Stop the anti-ugly madness!
B
It doesn't. It manoeuvres him to a morally superior position that allows him to feel justified in punching down. Except in this case it doesn't, and makes him look like a pretentious moron.
In other words he does what every other normie faggot does: Try to increase his social standing and capital by belittling those below him (or even lateral to him) on the hierarchy.
Evolution is a shitty optimizer and can be outdone by human ingenuity.
The genetics that sexual selection optimizes for are not really aligned with humanities highest values.
The genetics that sexual selection optimizes for are not really aligned with humanities highest values.
>discussing about logic in moral philosophy in which no objective axioms are allowed in 2020
O
"it's good that incels are not being chosen, you shouldn't be, nature decided so"
Wrong, femoids decided so, and they aren't arbiters of what "evolution wants".
Wrong, femoids decided so, and they aren't arbiters of what "evolution wants".
M
I wish i could rip his fucking head off and show him "muh nature" first hand
High IQ.100% my point when people bring up the fucking 'nature' argument
Last edited:
Attachments
D
Evolution argument debunked in one tweet.
Because short women should be sterilized perhaps since they carry the short gene for short men even regarding the tall man who create tall women.
Last edited:
This Jerry Barnett idiot is the classic douchebag who confuses social Darwinism with real Darwinism. Pull off the mask on all these appeal to nature, just world fallacy, muh survival of the fittest Jerry Barnett types and you'll see a creature that looks a lot like a neo-Nazi eugenicist.
Charles Darwin's actual words: "It is not the strongest of species that survive, but the ones most adaptive to change." That's why T-Rexes are extinct and turtles are still alive. Anyone who thinks the "goal" of evolution is to make species "chaddier" is wrong on so many levels it would take a 10,000 word essay to explain all the ways in which they're wrong. Just touching on a few brief points, evolution has no "goals." Evolution is an unconscious process that is simply species changing over time to adapt to changing environmental conditions. There is no "ultimate super-species" or "end goal." The biggest, baddest, most ferocious meat-eating dinosaur is extinct just like the others.
"But what about filtering out 'bad' genes?" Well, even if everyone could agree on what genes are "bad," this anti-incel jihad would still be stupid and wrong because short/ugly/stupid/defective/whatever WOMEN are still passing on THEIR genes in the "ideal" system of retards like Jerry Barnett. Since in this system no woman is too ugly to reproduce, it ensures that future generations of incels will keep being born with no end in sight.
ALL of the people who use the "appeal to nature" argument are hypocrites. ALL of them. None of them would react to being about to get eaten by a grizzly bear with, "Oh well, it's just nature. Can't complain."
Ever notice how you've probably heard some variation of "Tough shit. You need to get over it" thousands of times, but you never hear people say, "Tough shit. I need to get over it."
Charles Darwin's actual words: "It is not the strongest of species that survive, but the ones most adaptive to change." That's why T-Rexes are extinct and turtles are still alive. Anyone who thinks the "goal" of evolution is to make species "chaddier" is wrong on so many levels it would take a 10,000 word essay to explain all the ways in which they're wrong. Just touching on a few brief points, evolution has no "goals." Evolution is an unconscious process that is simply species changing over time to adapt to changing environmental conditions. There is no "ultimate super-species" or "end goal." The biggest, baddest, most ferocious meat-eating dinosaur is extinct just like the others.
"But what about filtering out 'bad' genes?" Well, even if everyone could agree on what genes are "bad," this anti-incel jihad would still be stupid and wrong because short/ugly/stupid/defective/whatever WOMEN are still passing on THEIR genes in the "ideal" system of retards like Jerry Barnett. Since in this system no woman is too ugly to reproduce, it ensures that future generations of incels will keep being born with no end in sight.
ALL of the people who use the "appeal to nature" argument are hypocrites. ALL of them. None of them would react to being about to get eaten by a grizzly bear with, "Oh well, it's just nature. Can't complain."
Ever notice how you've probably heard some variation of "Tough shit. You need to get over it" thousands of times, but you never hear people say, "Tough shit. I need to get over it."
This.
These types are the worst. If you want to play the appeal to nature game then lets do it right. No more laws, no more civilization.
You're going to quickly find that being 8 inches taller than average and having the biggest bones in your face might not necessarily be the peak of human evolution just because women think that. Especially when you're getting your skull smashed in with a rock by a few incels from a neighboring tribe as they drag your women into the rape cave.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
