Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Anti-Rape Devices like Rape-aXe Should be Banned (This is NOT a Pro-Rape Thread)

ALifeWastedOnRot

ALifeWastedOnRot

Banned
-
Joined
May 16, 2025
Posts
2,671
I should be clear, this is not in any way an endorsement of rape, but a mere suggestion that anti-rape devices such as Rape-aXe should be banned. Oftentimes leftists will say they're not pro-crime, but they're pro banning guns even for self-defense purposes. I'm going to use the same line of reasoning but mine actually makes more sense than banning firearms.

1) Cruel and Inhumane:

In case anyone doesn't know, the Rape-aXe is a plastic device with inverted barbed spikes. The device is inserted into a woman's vagina so if a man tries to rape her, it will latch onto his penis. It will be impossible for him to take off without destroying his penis with the barbed spikes. He will be forced to turn himself in to the police in order to get it off. I find it so ironic how if one set up a spiked trap like this for a burglar, or shot someone entering their house, they'd be criminally charged, but toilets can set up medievil torture devices and get away with it under full legal sanction. If I assault someone breaking into my car, I'm getting charged, but if a toilet sicks a spiked torture machine onto a man's penis she's just defending herself.

2) Gender inequity:

Because vaginas are inverted, toilets can get away with hiding the Rape-aXe where the rapist won't even know it exists until it's too late. Due to biological differences, it's impossible for a man to do the same. If a man had a Rape-aXe that attached to the penis, obviously with un-inverted spikes, a potential female rapist would see it long before it got stuck in her vagina. If we are so concerned with "gender equity", why are we allowing toilets to protect themselves with a device that would be impossible for a man to put to use? Our society seems to only endorse things that benefit toilets over men, and I'm sick of the hypocrisy.
 
Beyond that there's nothing stopping some slut to use it to entrap a man by pretending to be willing to be fucked with it inside of her and then crying rape after the fact to further ruin his life.
 
Just pull it out with your fingers
 
You know the Rape-aXe was never available for the public market anyways because of the very large opposition towards it. Most of the time girls carry that really annoying rape alarm whenever someone is trying to attack them.
 
Last edited:
The foids wearing these are probably too ugly and fat to get raped in the first place


There's less than one thousand rapes a year. I doubt a rapist would waste his efforts on some feminist whale
 
Beyond that there's nothing stopping some slut to use it to entrap a man by pretending to be willing to be fucked with it inside of her and then crying rape after the fact to further ruin his life.
I thought about this as well.
 
I've heard about this and I thought it was disgusting.
The only ways you can stop rape is by legalising prostitution, and addressing the causes of inceldom.
No amount of education will stop us. (((Stonewall))) and its faggot shits can fuck off.
 
I've heard about this and I thought it was disgusting.
The only ways you can stop rape is by legalising prostitution, and addressing the causes of inceldom.
No amount of education will stop us. (((Stonewall))) can fuck off.
Then how would they tap into your orgone energy?
 
Well it's a damn good thing these projects never saw the light of day 18 years ago.
I didn't know they were never implemented I just assumed it was a low key thing.
 
I've heard about this and I thought it was disgusting.
The only ways you can stop rape is by legalising prostitution, and addressing the causes of inceldom.
I agree that's the moral solution, but technically more surveillance and enforcement can stop it too, they basically ended it in Duibai and Singapore.
No amount of education will stop us. (((Stonewall))) and its faggot shits can fuck off.
 
Because vaginas are inverted, toilets can get away with hiding the Rape-aXe where the rapist won't even know it exists until it's too late.
in that case it would literally be classified as a booby trap and the foid would be liable for damages to the male :feelshaha:
 
The foids wearing these are probably too ugly and fat to get raped in the first place


There's less than one thousand rapes a year. I doubt a rapist would waste his efforts on some feminist whale
There’s probably more in Mumbai alone
 
She can't hide it in her ass/mouth
 
Invented in Vietnam...
 
Foids can use this as a honeypot too
 
I should be clear, this is not in any way an endorsement of rape, but a mere suggestion that anti-rape devices such as Rape-aXe should be banned. Oftentimes leftists will say they're not pro-crime, but they're pro banning guns even for self-defense purposes. I'm going to use the same line of reasoning but mine actually makes more sense than banning firearms.

1) Cruel and Inhumane:

In case anyone doesn't know, the Rape-aXe is a plastic device with inverted barbed spikes. The device is inserted into a woman's vagina so if a man tries to rape her, it will latch onto his penis. It will be impossible for him to take off without destroying his penis with the barbed spikes. He will be forced to turn himself in to the police in order to get it off. I find it so ironic how if one set up a spiked trap like this for a burglar, or shot someone entering their house, they'd be criminally charged, but toilets can set up medievil torture devices and get away with it under full legal sanction. If I assault someone breaking into my car, I'm getting charged, but if a toilet sicks a spiked torture machine onto a man's penis she's just defending herself.

2) Gender inequity:

Because vaginas are inverted, toilets can get away with hiding the Rape-aXe where the rapist won't even know it exists until it's too late. Due to biological differences, it's impossible for a man to do the same. If a man had a Rape-aXe that attached to the penis, obviously with un-inverted spikes, a potential female rapist would see it long before it got stuck in her vagina. If we are so concerned with "gender equity", why are we allowing toilets to protect themselves with a device that would be impossible for a man to put to use? Our society seems to only endorse things that benefit toilets over men, and I'm sick of the hypocrisy.
Also wouldn’t the guy need to trap the female and undress her and know something’s inside her hole. This is just common sense.
 
I should be clear, this is not in any way an endorsement of rape, but a mere suggestion that anti-rape devices such as Rape-aXe should be banned. Oftentimes leftists will say they're not pro-crime, but they're pro banning guns even for self-defense purposes. I'm going to use the same line of reasoning but mine actually makes more sense than banning firearms.

1) Cruel and Inhumane:

In case anyone doesn't know, the Rape-aXe is a plastic device with inverted barbed spikes. The device is inserted into a woman's vagina so if a man tries to rape her, it will latch onto his penis. It will be impossible for him to take off without destroying his penis with the barbed spikes. He will be forced to turn himself in to the police in order to get it off. I find it so ironic how if one set up a spiked trap like this for a burglar, or shot someone entering their house, they'd be criminally charged, but toilets can set up medievil torture devices and get away with it under full legal sanction. If I assault someone breaking into my car, I'm getting charged, but if a toilet sicks a spiked torture machine onto a man's penis she's just defending herself.

2) Gender inequity:

Because vaginas are inverted, toilets can get away with hiding the Rape-aXe where the rapist won't even know it exists until it's too late. Due to biological differences, it's impossible for a man to do the same. If a man had a Rape-aXe that attached to the penis, obviously with un-inverted spikes, a potential female rapist would see it long before it got stuck in her vagina. If we are so concerned with "gender equity", why are we allowing toilets to protect themselves with a device that would be impossible for a man to put to use? Our society seems to only endorse things that benefit toilets over men, and I'm sick of the hypocrisy.
Thats why you should always insert a stick in vagina as a bait before raping that bitch
 
Solution:Rape her in the asshole :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
Beyond that there's nothing stopping some slut to use it to entrap a man by pretending to be willing to be fucked with it inside of her and then crying rape after the fact to further ruin his life.
 

Jaap Haumann​

An early prototypical anti-rape female tampon was invented in late 2000 by Jaap Haumann, a South African man, for the purpose of preventing rape.[5] Haumann's device was designed to resemble a tampon for ease of insertion, and consisted of a hard cylindrical plastic core containing a tensioned spring blade primed to slice when pressed against by the tip of a penis. Following activation, a portion of the tip of the penis would be removed, in effect performing a minor penectomy.

 
I've heard about this and I thought it was disgusting.
The only ways you can stop rape is by legalising prostitution, and addressing the causes of inceldom.
No amount of education will stop us. (((Stonewall))) and its faggot shits can fuck off.
I don't think legalizing prostitution will reduce rape. I think all rape accusations are false. None of them should be believed. Contrary to what feminists say, "believe all women," I believe we should believe the man in these cases. As I said in another thread, "All rape accusations by ugly women are false rape accusations." I don't really agree with everything in that thread though, so I'm not going to link it. I now think even beautiful foids make false rape accusations.
 
I don't think legalizing prostitution will reduce rape.
I truly think having a global legal prostitution system would reduce the risk of rape and i wish prostitution was legal and controlled by authorities to give to sexless men an alternative in their life and without health risk, illegal prostitution is health gambling and it's unfair for men with a sexless life...
 
I truly think having a global legal prostitution system would reduce the risk of rape and i wish prostitution was legal and controlled by authorities to give to sexless men an alternative in their life and without health risk, illegal prostitution is health gambling and it's unfair for men with a sexless life...
I don't believe the feminist line that says all men are rapists or that all sex is rape, as Andrea Dworkin is said to have said. I take the stance that's opposite to feminism, "no man is a rapist."
 
I don't believe the feminist line that says all men are rapists or that all sex is rape, as Andrea Dworkin is said to have said. I take the stance that's opposite to feminism, "no man is a rapist."
I agree, most men are not born rapist and in a system that give them enough space to evovle as man having access to women in their life they should never encounter the thoughts of raping a woman, but i also beleive that a man who live in a society that show him everyday sex he can't have will drive insane and probably end up doing something wrong, it might be rape or just flashing his dick in public to a woman, many men who do that, are guys seeking something they can't have and because they can't rape, they choose an option that will at least fullfill some part of their desire to be seen and desired...Even if 99% of the time the women is just horrified by such behavior, it's the same as guy showing their cock in DM to women on internet, they trully beleive it's going to open doors :feelskek:
 
I don't think legalizing prostitution will reduce rape. I think all rape accusations are false. None of them should be believed. Contrary to what feminists say, "believe all women," I believe we should believe the man in these cases. As I said in another thread, "All rape accusations by ugly women are false rape accusations." I don't really agree with everything in that thread though, so I'm not going to link it. I now think even beautiful foids make false rape accusations.
:yes:
This is also very true. We need to stop assuming men are "guilty until proven innocent" with respect to ugly men. It seems "innocent until proven guilty" only holds true for toilets and Chads.
Yet another brutal blackpill.
 
Beyond that there's nothing stopping some slut to use it to entrap a man by pretending to be willing to be fucked with it inside of her and then crying rape after the fact to further ruin his life.
this is the worst part
 
Such a device would also result in an even worse outcome for the foid anyway.
 
The best way to prevent rapes is telling foids to stop behaving like slutty foiddroids
 
Such a device would also result in an even worse outcome for the foid anyway.
Yeah, if you are low-inhib to rape out of desire, imagine what you would do if you got your dick mangled by some iron maiden-type thing.
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
20
Views
305
cathuluelitist
cathuluelitist
FastBlast
Replies
20
Views
583
shyloser
shyloser
cathuluelitist
Replies
13
Views
760
Takuji Mamiya
Takuji Mamiya
R
Replies
18
Views
1K
Ricecel Sungnodius
Ricecel Sungnodius
Acorn
Replies
21
Views
955
nihilum
nihilum

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top