unique_freak
43 years old and lifetime dateless
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2022
- Posts
- 1,439
Toilets always talk about how a man has to be tall for them to date the man. What the toilets really mean is that the man cannot be short. How do I know this? Toilets' choices in men that they date belie their assertions that a man has to be tall for the toilets to date the man.
The average man in America is 5'10". If a man is 5'6" (four inches below average height), he is at a giant disadvantage in dating. If a man is 6'2" (four inches above average height), he is only at a slight advantage in dating over the average 5'10" guy with most women.
Some toilets are so height obsessed that they would pick an average faced or even an ugly faced 6'2" guy over a handsome 5'10" guy, but less than 10% of toilets are like that. Over 90% of toilets would pick a handsome 5'10" guy over an average-faced 6'2" guy.
Once a guy is about 5'8", his face does more to determine his sexual market value than his height. So in a dating pool in which all the men are 5'8" or taller, tall height is just an add-on (for women to brag about). It's not the main thing.
This is an asymmetry in how men's heights affect their sexual market value. You can only detect this asymmetry from watching what men toilets choose to date, not from the toilet's own words. A man's having a short height puts a short guy at a massive disadvantage in dating, but if a man has a tall height, the tall man's height only gives the tall man a slight advantage over medium height men.
Is this post based? Do you agree with me that there is an asymmetry in how men's height affect their sexual market value?
The average man in America is 5'10". If a man is 5'6" (four inches below average height), he is at a giant disadvantage in dating. If a man is 6'2" (four inches above average height), he is only at a slight advantage in dating over the average 5'10" guy with most women.
Some toilets are so height obsessed that they would pick an average faced or even an ugly faced 6'2" guy over a handsome 5'10" guy, but less than 10% of toilets are like that. Over 90% of toilets would pick a handsome 5'10" guy over an average-faced 6'2" guy.
Once a guy is about 5'8", his face does more to determine his sexual market value than his height. So in a dating pool in which all the men are 5'8" or taller, tall height is just an add-on (for women to brag about). It's not the main thing.
This is an asymmetry in how men's heights affect their sexual market value. You can only detect this asymmetry from watching what men toilets choose to date, not from the toilet's own words. A man's having a short height puts a short guy at a massive disadvantage in dating, but if a man has a tall height, the tall man's height only gives the tall man a slight advantage over medium height men.
Is this post based? Do you agree with me that there is an asymmetry in how men's height affect their sexual market value?
Last edited: