Women choose to underlyingly believe in the halo effect, or at least the effect which permits men to be seen as what their looks imply. Because women love comparativeness, and dominance in things that are not determined BY YOU, yet which still speak columes ABOUT YOU.
This is a vastly encounterable variation within the female genome. So much such that it may be deemed the maincourse of the genetic code. The mantle of the "archform" of the geno-jumbling. Or the inner "ordoform". The form which the order of the genojumbling typically takes. And it shows that, if our genes are narcissistic then they are a narcissistic race.
Women want men who would be distinguishable across all criticism systems. Women are looking for men who will fill their narcissistic fantasies. Again, PUA's perspective that if you make the right moves to a foid she will pick you... assuming you can control her chemical reactions. When a foid has an inner dialogue OF HER OWN, and chessmoves her selection/ interactions maybe far more than men do.
Men creating a chemical reaction is something women are trained to fight against, and decide for themselves. Especially in SJW 21st century. And their families/ themselves trying to find what is right. Funthinkers vs practicalthinkers. Ugly guys can only get the funthinkers, and not the farsighted practical thinking women who are geno-farming to be highvalue in the stuff that intelligent people probably know is relevant.
Fun havers will jsut fuck whoever gives the best buzz. But longterm a pudgy dude with a beard like RSD tyler won't make the girl feel confident around a lot of her own groups and circles.
Women are chessmoving their selections which makes any effort to impose anything that will cause a chemical reaction (nevermind the fact that that'll also depend on your looks) as folly. At least to the high iq, non primitive ones. If you try to make a move, even as a chad, then it will only be good in relation to their own personal dialogue/ choice making side of the conscientious brain. If you try and work against that, then you're a manipulator (rsd/ pua teaches manipulation). And if you think they're always gonna be neutral, and receive you as a fair shot irrespective of looks then that's bluepill.
PUA makes fake premise of female withdrawn demeanor as being open minded/ respectful. It's not. It's just being reserved. If women were more extroverted abt it hten pua would not be able to sell their bs.
Women really primally want distinguishment, dominance, power, etc. Something more ethereal than earthy. With a refinement that seems out of this world. They want a guy who has seemed to be on the elite end of everything. The elitarchy. Rocky may turn out to be a winner sometimes, but that's still earthy to conceptualize. They want the top dog, not the underdog.
Women love being the passive despot the movie-world would label as the big bad villain (in pedigree/ status/ notoriety) than the little hero.
They don't just judge waht they see of you. They judge the novelty/ flavor/ background of your nonmalleable traits. (nonmalleable/ unchangeable traits are the true markers of distinction/ distinguishment in the selection hierarchies of sexuality especially). Women are thinking about up-ranking almost more than the sex itself. They want to have pedigree passively residuate with their step. They want that. Stuff you're born with because producing it would require too much wilpowero r self restraint to have it be done realistically.
They wish for that. The fact that something remains natural, and unforced means that you have the tyrannoluxriance that makes them feel they're with an oppressor who even god himself could see as legitimate. Women fear karma, and want a guy who karmically has been given a winner's life, so that that can rub off on them, and the loser, who has failo karma will not have it show up amidst their unluckier and poorer traits.
Suspicion, and wariness of fate, and including all manner of being right/ unright based on your wealth of ethereal (rather than earthy) genetics/ traits/ etc. are all underlying things women are looking at when they look at you.
This is a vastly encounterable variation within the female genome. So much such that it may be deemed the maincourse of the genetic code. The mantle of the "archform" of the geno-jumbling. Or the inner "ordoform". The form which the order of the genojumbling typically takes. And it shows that, if our genes are narcissistic then they are a narcissistic race.
Women want men who would be distinguishable across all criticism systems. Women are looking for men who will fill their narcissistic fantasies. Again, PUA's perspective that if you make the right moves to a foid she will pick you... assuming you can control her chemical reactions. When a foid has an inner dialogue OF HER OWN, and chessmoves her selection/ interactions maybe far more than men do.
Men creating a chemical reaction is something women are trained to fight against, and decide for themselves. Especially in SJW 21st century. And their families/ themselves trying to find what is right. Funthinkers vs practicalthinkers. Ugly guys can only get the funthinkers, and not the farsighted practical thinking women who are geno-farming to be highvalue in the stuff that intelligent people probably know is relevant.
Fun havers will jsut fuck whoever gives the best buzz. But longterm a pudgy dude with a beard like RSD tyler won't make the girl feel confident around a lot of her own groups and circles.
Women are chessmoving their selections which makes any effort to impose anything that will cause a chemical reaction (nevermind the fact that that'll also depend on your looks) as folly. At least to the high iq, non primitive ones. If you try to make a move, even as a chad, then it will only be good in relation to their own personal dialogue/ choice making side of the conscientious brain. If you try and work against that, then you're a manipulator (rsd/ pua teaches manipulation). And if you think they're always gonna be neutral, and receive you as a fair shot irrespective of looks then that's bluepill.
PUA makes fake premise of female withdrawn demeanor as being open minded/ respectful. It's not. It's just being reserved. If women were more extroverted abt it hten pua would not be able to sell their bs.
Women really primally want distinguishment, dominance, power, etc. Something more ethereal than earthy. With a refinement that seems out of this world. They want a guy who has seemed to be on the elite end of everything. The elitarchy. Rocky may turn out to be a winner sometimes, but that's still earthy to conceptualize. They want the top dog, not the underdog.
Women love being the passive despot the movie-world would label as the big bad villain (in pedigree/ status/ notoriety) than the little hero.
They don't just judge waht they see of you. They judge the novelty/ flavor/ background of your nonmalleable traits. (nonmalleable/ unchangeable traits are the true markers of distinction/ distinguishment in the selection hierarchies of sexuality especially). Women are thinking about up-ranking almost more than the sex itself. They want to have pedigree passively residuate with their step. They want that. Stuff you're born with because producing it would require too much wilpowero r self restraint to have it be done realistically.
They wish for that. The fact that something remains natural, and unforced means that you have the tyrannoluxriance that makes them feel they're with an oppressor who even god himself could see as legitimate. Women fear karma, and want a guy who karmically has been given a winner's life, so that that can rub off on them, and the loser, who has failo karma will not have it show up amidst their unluckier and poorer traits.
Suspicion, and wariness of fate, and including all manner of being right/ unright based on your wealth of ethereal (rather than earthy) genetics/ traits/ etc. are all underlying things women are looking at when they look at you.
