Best thing I've ever heard.
Last edited:
Best thing I've ever heard.
Yes, there's a lot of truth in what he's saying.
Parents are afraid to tell their kids that they suck at something nowadays. It's only ever praise. Turns kids into cucks and takes the competitive drive out of them.
Parents are afraid to tell their kids that they suck at something nowadays. It's only ever praise. Turns kids into cucks and takes the competitive drive out of them.
why care to fit this insane status quo , no need to impress or owe anyone anything but yoruself
Have fun never being worth a shit then.
Unless this a bluepill irony comment.
Last edited:
it isnt
D
tbh my parents always told me i sucked at everything and now I have absolutely 0 competitive drive. However it could also be because being good at something isnt going to improve my life because i'm so ugly anyway.
Damn, sorry to hear that. My parents were the opposite of yours, and I have 0 competitive drive as well.
I'm guessing that us being blackpilled has fucked with our motivational systems since society bases its incentives and rewards on men being forever bluepilled.
D
It's ok bro. I think a balance is needed, parents can't be too extreme with their praise or with their criticism.
And you're right, even before I discovered the blackpill I was hopelessly demotivated because of my ugly face. But since discovering it, my motivation has reached rock bottom.
You need to feel there's some rightfulness/ hope/ purpose to your power. It works well with grandiosity seduced narcissists like me who aren't hopeless looking but wanting to be perfect which I am not.
And yes, society equates so much with looks because society doesn't just want people who are good at things.
They want display sets/ things that resonate with high-life karma. Not low life flukers.
Society wants to be around regality and class that resonates with the topdog- not underdog.
Obviously in science its' different because it's about things not of pride, but just mathematicals/ non-emotionals/ human advancement/ purpose and logic driven elements.
But when you run on narcissism, and wanting ongoing validation/ high life significance, then that's an entirely different matter.
I am an extremely motivated person especially when I have narcissistic personality disorder.
Then you're a cuck.
Impressing others may seem like being cucked, but it is really an effort to cuck them which can work for many.
Dark Triading is the only way to live. Let the plebs think that insecurity is blah blah blah. But in reality it's good for you.
Yes i barely see a chad hitting the gym. they dont care
That's why the people who are the ones who are insecure are the rightful chads.
I've seen chads vastly outnumbered by others at gyms. Very few chads. But the real bad asses are those whose spirit guides them. Not just those whose spirit is carried off of primal currency like pampered brats.
It's over
Moral here: Insecurity is good and those who choose to ignore their insecurities are evasive unaccountable pussies.
Being compensatory is no different than the vast amount of arrogant assholes who are vain and narcissistic anyway.
In reality the idea that people aren't insecure is a false premise. False enough that anyone who calls out another person to deflate their power/ pride in being insecure is delusional.
But we still have to understand it because most people are dumb. So we need to create some veneering narrative to our insecurities if people were to found out what our drive is coming from.
Most of the time, when people are driven, people do not do so out of love for the ordeal but out of hatred of what the thing we're trying to get out poses by its existence.
That's why those with a very exacting sesne of happiness/ properness are better off than a lot of people who are just broadly happy with everything.
They will feel more insecure.
Most people hate the world they're born in, and love very ethereal/ non tangible things.
We are more drawn to meet those things, but we have lack of faith doing it. Lack of confidence. So we get boosted by our hatred of what reality IS as an additional bolster. SO that we ALWAYS feel driven no matter what circumstance.
Inscure people, when things cross our narcissism/ sense of propriety will beget anger.
Anger is the food for the focus muscle. Rage is the vomit where the food goes out in a splash, and gets a mess everywhere.
Anger/ fear/ stress based emotions are the primal/ narcissist's sentience builder... against our lazy/ narcissistic nature. Where we find the motivation in terms of motivation to learn, and to crush the main thing when we want to by gaining power/ knowledge for the sake of being superior.
or locationmaxx better.
Being compensatory is no different than the vast amount of arrogant assholes who are vain and narcissistic anyway.
In reality the idea that people aren't insecure is a false premise. False enough that anyone who calls out another person to deflate their power/ pride in being insecure is delusional.
But we still have to understand it because most people are dumb. So we need to create some veneering narrative to our insecurities if people were to found out what our drive is coming from.
Most of the time, when people are driven, people do not do so out of love for the ordeal but out of hatred of what the thing we're trying to get out poses by its existence.
That's why those with a very exacting sesne of happiness/ properness are better off than a lot of people who are just broadly happy with everything.
They will feel more insecure.
Most people hate the world they're born in, and love very ethereal/ non tangible things.
We are more drawn to meet those things, but we have lack of faith doing it. Lack of confidence. So we get boosted by our hatred of what reality IS as an additional bolster. SO that we ALWAYS feel driven no matter what circumstance.
Inscure people, when things cross our narcissism/ sense of propriety will beget anger.
Anger is the food for the focus muscle. Rage is the vomit where the food goes out in a splash, and gets a mess everywhere.
Anger/ fear/ stress based emotions are the primal/ narcissist's sentience builder... against our lazy/ narcissistic nature. Where we find the motivation in terms of motivation to learn, and to crush the main thing when we want to by gaining power/ knowledge for the sake of being superior.
he should join communism, larp as an egalitarian, and act compassionate and frame/ devirtueize that chad.
or locationmaxx better.
Lifting weight put pressure on your spine and dmg nerves in your spine who are connected with legs arms,etc and if that nerves are dmg you develop numbness in legs,arms etc and back pain and other things.
Weight lifting is bad.
Weight lifting is bad.
The human race is irritable and barbaric anyway.
And only if you do it wrong.
Which some have. Like my dad.
Later will come later and everyone has body problems at the age of 50. But not everyone at the age of 50 lived like a champ.
At one point.
I agree with your previous point, but dark triads aren't insecure.
That fucking bluepill inspirational shit
i didnt disagree with anything you just said.
So it's not bluepill. and bluepill describes reality. I'm describing a way to look at reality.
I'm saying that later will come later and living the first 50 years of your life like a beast > being healthy for 80.
narcissism will inevitably meet insecurity.
Psychopaths and machiavellians in of themselves as a vacuum can be neutral on the insecurity, but narcissism will meet it.
And that's a good thing. Makes you more driven.
Can't believe none of you understnad this shit.
Well, a lot of people aren't mpotivated naturally because a lot of what people naturally love gets flattened by the dismality of reality, and your place in it.
So having self esteem issues/ hatred/ etc is the motivator when you are given the lode of reality concept/ awareness that makes you unhappy, miserable, despressed.
It's just commonsensical/ usual for people to find more wrong than right. We're talking about exceptions here when people have it so good they can just tootsie-skip into whatever they want with positivity.
BUt competitivity naturally comes and being too secure/ in the green is just unrealistic to assume people wil lfeel throughout the way. BEING CONSTNATLY POSITIVE WITHOUT HAVING TO FALL INTO FEAR in some point is unrealistic. Being angry though is the best way to find your tracks to break the world down.
Jumping out from self esteem/ paranoia is the better way to approach (and hte one we should focus on) than being positive, or finding a way to make positivity. Sure you can put all your eggs on the positivity basket. But I think there's a certain beauty to being in conflict, negative meotion, strife. THat goes for more of the intravagant, fight or flight emotions than being positive.
OF course you need to be positive sometimes, so it's good to throw yourself out there.
But your main engine you should glide on should be a mix between rage and serenity.
Essentially embody the rage, and use serenity as the backup.
It's too stressful/ too difficult to be on the positive, and then muster up the highly taxing negativity resources to be enraged.
Be entrenched/ engorged in what is what is hard, and then the more gracile psychological substances like serenity should go in.
Negativity is hard, difficult, and stressful to manage. positivity, serenity, etc. are easy but negativity must be cleared out.
It's like if you want to find something in a rock slide, you don't just look around every rock, then look under. You first do the big heavy haul first, lift them all up, and then you're not stressed out repeatedly looking around each rock without lifting them up.
It's why the delicate firing equipment is inside of a tank's armor. It's better to have yourself have a thick skin, good defense for high offense that's delicate. Imagine if the tank's equipment was bare for the enemy to see? then there wouldn't be positive insulation so that people can easily focus on what they're doing inside to launch the portable canon.
That's why positivity is great but it's highly delicate. but you need negativity the majority of the time when things will attack it.
Positivity/ perfect grace/ serenity is good but hard to control. But the general majority should be grounded/ adapted for the negative.
But while we're at that state let's take inspiration from the negatives around us and be angry.
It's called effort conservation/ momentum. Psychologically strategizing for optimal leverage.
I believe there was a study done that shows that they tend to be narcissistic.
The main distincitonalities of your smv are your nonmalleables, because that was determined by genetics, and will be where women (who look at the ideal lens in their estimation of everything, and not realistic lens... in this day and age, or because they're narcissistic and want oppression/ dominance) will look. Because nonmalleables are the location of where things that people cannot help will be weaker/ more inferior in, and women know there are major distinctionalities of people who have dominance/ hierarchal superiority to other men. And the places where people cannot help... like genetics... (which will give people the edge mentally to make more money) will be.
Sad that everoyne in America is in the privileged bracket in the hierarchy ofn eedw where having food, clothes, water isn't good enough, and we're looking to improving ourselves rather than helping africa LOL.
Yes, women are only sexually attracted to the non-malleable, mostly genetic traits in men. This is why it's not sexy to be "hard-working" unless, say, you come from a famous and wealthy family of entrepreneurs, since women have no way of knowing whether you're hard-working as a way of coping with other genetic inferior traits of yours or whether you're hard-working because you're genetically gifted in that way.
Whether a trait is genetic or not makes all the difference to foids. They will only find traits sexy if they know they can be passed on to their offspring (they can't be faked or artificially enhanced).
I predict that as facial and reconstructive surgeries become more sophisticated, women will become more interested in mens' height and bone structure relative to their faces since they will no longer be able to trust faces as evidence of superior genes.
Weightlifting = not being satisfied with the quality of women you get and/or the lack of respect you get from other men, so you try to make yourself more sexually dimorphic and try to look higher test/higher fighting success is order to get respect/higher estrogen pussy.
Can anyone inspire me to lift weights? I fucking hate it, but I'm trying to look my best and possibly be able to intimidate white-knights who may try to start shit with me.
Non malleables are the method by which you are defined. Not because the nonmalleable is in a certain state (althoug the state of the non malleable is essential) but it's the underliyng premise of those traits implying power, regality, winner life karma. (state of the non malleable being shape of nose, height you have).
What's more importan than that is that you have what implies winner/ dominarch life karma. That you come in the complete set of dominarchicality so that women believe oyu are on the high end of life, and by association, her with you.
Women underlyingly assume the genetics are the gateway to knowing the true person. That in most cases that forms the true distinction markers between human beings, and all other tryhards are irrelevant in terms of value.
The delineators show the nonmalleables because only someone moulded into those characteristics will be above others, and THus carry the primal designation of "winner" IN LIFE.
It's not just about what's passed on to their children.
Are people superior to others in places that hteir competition cannot help?
Does the value look powerful and authentic. Beyond all questioning.
Women are wanting to be on the dominant side of life. The superficiality and judgmentalism tries to gain the balance of power in the realm of criticism (that influences public opinion and affects the degree of spotlight upon humanity). And anything that can potentially be criticized causes insecurity, and reduces their chances of dominance in the world.
Go into a makeup store and you can assume what a female loves. It's fashionability, dominance, power, etc. And superficiality. Trying to cover up to look the most perfect in presentability. Trying to cover up things to attract the man who is the most dominant. But it also implies that there is competition, and girls are trying ot look the best to attract the best guy. Women can get most men and they know that already. So they must be competing to get a guy that is different from the many, but other girls are on him so she must look the best. Makeup implies hypergamy.
Thanks. This makes sense. It also explains why even middle-aged and older women still desire men with non-malleable traits despite being too old to give birth to any more children.
very disappointed with the fact very few people know how to word the most essential aspects of the blackpill here.
But someone has to.
depends on your drive, and what it revolves around.
If you hate it then just focus on your hatred of them, and the pleasure of cruhsing them through the means of working out.
Most of us are more driven by the negatives than the positives. Because our positives are the products of refinement that we have to weigh through the muck of things we hate to get through. The onyl way to make that bridge is to hate and attack the things that separate us from our positives from our current position.
Such as a person who is insecure/ hates their body and woudl love to be good looking.
We are not equipped to be positive, ... we as a species are negativity eliminators. It's why we're so paranoid no matter how positive a person says they are. Many people are just numb or seek the positive out of cope/ escape but there wouldn't have to be anything to escape from if we were positive truly. We naturally incline ourselves to doomsday scenarios/ negativity
and to look for the light and ignore hating what separates us form it. That's a two way battle because focusing on being positive/ staying onthe good is another pressure when we're being bombarded by the negative. So why not just strike and lash against what is already ailing us?
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
