No science is proven without a doubt. Science is empirical and based upon what scanners/ scopes we have to understand reality.
Sure it may be doubtless that you can make the intuited move to drop a rock on glass from 50 feet up and it will shatter.
Or that it will be harder to break a diamond than quarts because a diamond is denser.
But the people who always insult the epistemological knowledge we have, us blackpillers just amuse me.
If women are superficial, then they're superficial.
Just like if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then you know the rest.
We don't need epistemological divine proof.
Plus if all is unknown or uncertain then how can anything be a definite measure for telling what something is?
Our senses are a guide.
Although nothing is fully secure in science there is a lot less reason to perceive something as inseucre.
Like if you've just conquered all of spain and you're worried a small forest that is the only place that is uncharted holds an army of 100,000 men. Nah probably not.
Sure it may be doubtless that you can make the intuited move to drop a rock on glass from 50 feet up and it will shatter.
Or that it will be harder to break a diamond than quarts because a diamond is denser.
But the people who always insult the epistemological knowledge we have, us blackpillers just amuse me.
If women are superficial, then they're superficial.
Just like if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then you know the rest.
We don't need epistemological divine proof.
Plus if all is unknown or uncertain then how can anything be a definite measure for telling what something is?
Our senses are a guide.
Although nothing is fully secure in science there is a lot less reason to perceive something as inseucre.
Like if you've just conquered all of spain and you're worried a small forest that is the only place that is uncharted holds an army of 100,000 men. Nah probably not.
