Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Agecucks are retarded.

NorthernWind

NorthernWind

Paragon
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Posts
17,517
Women have fully developed bodies at 16 y.o.
For example, look at this video featuring popular in the 80s female singer Sandra ( in the centre ).
She was 16 y.o. Does she looks like a child? She looks like she in her 30s.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0WEmXvMlxY
 
This video says it was recorded in 1978, and Sandra joined the group in 1979.- So in this video the lead singer might not be Sandra, FYI.
 
Last edited:
It's so odd here in the UK at least because you can have sex at 16 but send one nude photo and that image is very much illegal.

I don't know what the law says about sex chat. I think you'd probably be OK but I have no idea.

The obvious issue here is that that traps people who assume they're within the law but they're not.

This is why I tend to say I think the age of consent should be 18 just so people don't get stung in this way.

EDIT -- That issue aside I think 16 is probably fine but any younger is a bit much.
 
Cbf looking rn but can anyone find the body of a 16 year old foid that does not like developed and attractive?
 

Similar threads

Sir Silentium
Replies
10
Views
576
FarangInDaNang
FarangInDaNang
NoOneWillSaveMe
Replies
2
Views
497
NoOneWillSaveMe
NoOneWillSaveMe
ANTAGONIST
Replies
7
Views
767
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV
wasted12years
  • Poll
Replies
14
Views
494
wasted12years
wasted12years

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top