RageFuel Age of consent is inseparable linked with feminism if you support it you are a feminist

[Currycel25]

To all the IT cucks and incels here understand this if u believe in age of consent theory for women then you just close your account and leave
Because you people are either a larp or cucks because all the true incels I've met over the years wouldn't give 2 shits about a young girls being rape or killled much less about some old guy saying he is attracted to 16 year olds because they don't have shits too give unlike you normies
GTFO HERE FAGGOTS

Now on the matter of age of consent as we all know most biological women are mentally physically and emotionally inferior to men at any age
Women literally fuck dogs and gangsters and thugs and lack self-preservation protocols
So it's very stupid to say a women can only consent at 18 she can't and shouldn't at any age

So when should a girl have sex and with whome
Well like in the old days it should be decided by her father brother or some older male

 

[Caesercel]

Age of consent shouldn't exist if it cannot be applied consistently. Muh girls less than 18 cannot give consent to sex but they can fuck guys all through high school? If a guy is 17 then its ok if he fucks a 17 girl but not ok if a 21 yo does it?

I do agree that women should be brought back in control of men in the family. Too bad cumskins and jews are too cucked to do it. And everyone is busy emulating them

 

[GermaniaIncelia]

So it's very stupid to say a women can only consent at 18 she can't and shouldn't at any age

Too bad cumskins and jews are too cucked. And everyone is busy emulating them

agreed. but i feel it's pointless to talk about old ways when the ruling class has different plans. right now you can still try to reach a reasonable audience as an individual over the web to try and convince others of your idea that runs contrary to that of the ruling class. but that won't be the case for much longer. as the global surveillance apparatus tightens, any such opinions will be taken care of very quickly.

this might not be too relevant for some people on here like myself who don't plan to live to old age, but i'll state it for those that have different plans: you aren't going to help anyone by suggesting controversial reforms, they will never happen and you'll only be putting a bullseye target over yourself.

 

[Darkenzo]

Well like in the old days it should be decided by her father brother or some older male

Because they can control what their daughter gets up to? They're fucking chads at 13.

 

[Currycel25]

Because they can control what their daughter gets up to? They're fucking chads at 13.

Well men should have the power then if your daughter fucked someone you with your approval then she should get the belt

 

[Darkenzo]

Well men should have the power then if your daughter fucked someone you with your approval then she should get the belt

Yeah but the 24 year old chad wouldn't get punished by the law at all so they can keep doing it. The age of consent is only for them. It doesn't effect us as we're fully celibate. Unless you're an escortcell but that's a slightly different subject, I think escorts have to be 18+ anyway. If it's legal where you live.

 

[Mainländer]

High IQ. Just like in terms of Christian doctrine we have 1, 2, 3 and 4 points calvinists, if you support AoC laws, you are an (at least) 1 point feminist. Therefore you should GTFOOH.

 

[Dregster]

Yeah but the 24 year old chad wouldn't get punished by the law at all so they can keep doing it. The age of consent is only for them. It doesn't effect us as we're fully celibate. Unless you're an escortcell but that's a slightly different subject, I think escorts have to be 18+ anyway. If it's legal where you live.

This tbh

Anything less than death solves nothing

 

[Currycel25]

High IQ. Just like in terms of Christian doctrine we have 1, 2, 3 and 4 points calvinists, if you support AoC laws, you are an (at least) 1 point feminist. Therefore you should GTFOOH.

They my English is bad could u make a better version of my post

Yeah but the 24 year old chad wouldn't get punished by the law at all so they can keep doing it. The age of consent is only for them. It doesn't effect us as we're fully celibate. Unless you're an escortcell but that's a slightly different subject, I think escorts have to be 18+ anyway. If it's legal where you live.

I would be happy just fukking 20 something hookers but even that is not legal because muh oppression there should be a app to chose hooker like we do with pizzas and snacks on our phones

 

[spr33]

cope. Children can't consent in any way. I don't care what justification you have behind it. Children don't understand how anything works. Regardless of sex, they are innocent and they don't deserved to be violated.

Shut the fuck up you pedo trash.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

@Robtical @Mainländer thoughts?

 

[Currycel25]

cope. Children can't consent in any way. I don't care what justification you have behind it. Children don't understand how anything works. Regardless of sex, they are innocent and they don't deserved to be violated.

Shut the fuck up you pedo trash.

You completely missed the point and I do not accept you to understand either way
40 percent of under age kids are having sex in developed USA EU AUSTRALIA UK CANADA yes they do understand more about sex and relationships then we incels do
In fact most 16 year olds girls have more sexual experiences and STDs then most over 20s incels in this forum

 

[Robtical]

@Robtical @Mainländer thoughts?

The aoc should be when a foid is 13 and had a period.

 

[trying to ascend]

Lowering AOC = chad fucking pussies of all ages.

You really want chad to destroy pussies, or to preserve pussies by increasing the AOC? AOC should be increased to 22 imo (but only for foids)

 

[Deleted member 23712]

Lowering AOC = chad fucking pussies of all ages.

You really want chad to destroy pussies, or to preserve pussies? AOC should be increased to 22 imo (but only for foids)

It should be 21, like what they did to cigs

 

[trying to ascend]

It should be 21, like what they did to cigs

as long as it isn't a young age, its fine

 

[Currycel25]

The aoc should be when a foid is 13 and had a period.

No it should be decided under a supervision of a man father/ guardian
Women are stupid and too emotional They just complicate even simple things like sex

It should be 21, like what they did to cigs

It should be 21, like what they did to cigs

Uhh news flash most foids are fukking at 15

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Lowering AOC = chad fucking pussies of all ages.

You really want chad to destroy pussies, or to preserve pussies by increasing the AOC? AOC should be increased to 22 imo (but only for foids)

ye this is true, they need make AOC 21 and also make all sex with anything under 21 be charged with pedophilia, this should include both parties involved in the said sex act. this would punish the high school and college Chads and whores

 

[trying to ascend]

ye this is true, they need make AOC 21 and also make all sex with anything under 21 be charged with pedophilia, this should include both parties involved in the said sex act. this would punish the high school and college Chads and whores

AOC would only be 21 for foids, then if a guy who is 18 make sex with a foid who is 18, he will get charged only, and get probably 20 years in jail

 

[Robtical]

Lowering AOC = chad fucking pussies of all ages.

You really want chad to destroy pussies, or to preserve pussies by increasing the AOC? AOC should be increased to 22 imo (but only for foids)

Not lowering it makes it easier for teen chads to fuck all the jb pussy they want. It will be like shooting fish in a barrel for them. Better to lower it so non chads have a chance to marry a young virgin/near virgin.

 

[Currycel25]

ye this is true, they need make AOC 21 and also make all sex with anything under 21 be charged with pedophilia, this should include both parties involved in the said sex act. this would punish the high school and college Chads and whores

That sounds moronic it's literally gonna accomplished absolutely nothing after 21 they will have a gangbang orgy together and still exclude incels and low tier males

 

[trying to ascend]

Not lowering it makes it easier for teen chads to fuck all the jb pussy they want. It will be like shooting fish in a barrel for them. Better to lower it so non chads have a chance to marry a young virgin/near virgin.

Lowering will not make non chads marry them, it will only make chad fuck pussies earlier and earlier, and this would lead to more destroyed pussies

 

[Robtical]

Lowering will not make non chads marry them, it will only make chad fuck pussies earlier and earlier, and this would lead to more destroyed pussies

I dont care if that happens. At least there will be more teen prostitutes and we can watch young teen porn, and non chads won't be harassed by "pedohunter" fags when they try to meet a young jb.

 

[trying to ascend]

I dont care if that happens. At least there will be more teen prostitutes and we can watch young teen porn, and non chads won't be harassed by "pedohunter" fags when they try to meet a young jb.

Non chad pedos would get rejected btw, this shit only benefit chads and foids, idk why would you support it as a non chad.

Also, this would lead to foids making more money by making teen porn videos, so cucked af

 

[Currycel25]

Non chad pedos would get rejected btw, this shit only benefit chads and foids, idk why would you support it as a non chad.

Also, this would lead to foids making more money by making teen porn videos, so cucked af

Uhhh I like how both of u idots completely missed my point

 

[Robtical]

Non chad pedos would get rejected btw, this shit only benefit chads and foids, idk why would you support it as a non chad.

Also, this would lead to foids making more money by making teen porn videos, so cucked af

We get rejected anyway, so lowering the aoc will only keep non chads out of trouble, since they're the only ones who get in trouble by those cucked laws. If the jbs make more money from selling nudes that will take away from the old rosties, which is based.

 

[Julaybib]

Age of consent shouldn't exist if it cannot be applied consistently. Muh girls less than 18 cannot give consent to sex but they can fuck guys all through high school? If a guy is 17 then its ok if he fucks a 17 girl but not ok if a 21 yo does it?

I do agree that women should be brought back in control of men in the family. Too bad cumskins and jews are too cucked to do it. And everyone is busy emulating them

 

[DeepSea]

cope. Children can't consent in any way.

This is a demonstrably false statement. Consent refers to the provision of approval or agreement. To claim that children are incapable of approving or agreeing to something is absurd and insane.

Children don't understand how anything works. Regardless of sex, they are innocent and they don't deserved to be violated.

There are also possible negative consequences to riding in a car- the car can flip over and be set on fire, for example. Children do not comprehend these risks either, but does this mean we should ban children riding in cars on that basis? Should we ban kids from riding bicycles, skateboarding, and doing gymnastics because all those activities can and have caused injury and death?

they are innocent and they don't deserved to be violated.

Children, like adults, enjoy sexual activity, as the capacity for sexual gratification develops in the womb. It's common for girls to begin masturbating to orgasm when they are infants. Female fetuses have been observed masturbating in the uterus.

"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes[...]Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested." [Source]

Lowering AOC = chad fucking pussies of all ages.

You really want chad to destroy pussies, or to preserve pussies by increasing the AOC? AOC should be increased to 22 imo (but only for foids)

The only ones who benefit from current AoC laws are teenage chads and normies. They are completely shielded from having to sexually compete with grown men. Unless "close in age exemptions" and Romeo and Julliet laws were abolished, raising the AoC would accomplish nothing except make dating easier for teenage boys by eliminating sexual competion from adults.

The best solution is to make it illegal for males of any age to date or have sex with any female who still lives with her parents or custodians except if both the female and the father/custodian give their consent.

AoC laws should be completely abolished.

Prepubescent girls aren't anywhere near as prejudiced against unattractive males as teenage girls and adult women are. Women's sexual selection instinct only fully kicks in around the age of puberty to help them avoid putting themselves into situations where they could be impregnated by men with undesirable genetics.

It's a legitimate and sensible sexual strategy for lower-tier men to seek to obtain young girls, and only women benefit from it being illegal. Until modern times, it was considered acceptable for men to buy or adopt female children for the purpose of marrying them when they reach puberty.

 

[Robtical]

It's a legitimate and sensible sexual strategy for lower-tier men to seek to obtain young girls, and only women benefit from it being illegal. Until modern times, it was considered acceptable for men to buy or adopt female children for the purpose of marrying them when they reach puberty.

Based

 

[Currycel25]

This is a demonstrably false statement. Consent refers to the provision of approval or agreement. To claim that children are incapable of approving or agreeing to something is absurd and insane.



There are also possible negative consequences to riding in a car- the car can flip over and be set on fire, for example. Children do not comprehend these risks either, but does this mean we should ban children riding in cars on that basis? Should we ban kids from riding bicycles, skateboarding, and doing gymnastics because all those activities can and have caused injury and death?



Children, like adults, enjoy sexual activity, as the capacity for sexual gratification develops in the womb. It's common for girls to begin masturbating to orgasm when they are infants. Female fetuses have been observed masturbating in the uterus.

"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes[...]Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested." [Source]

The only ones who benefit from current AoC laws are teenage chads and normies. They are completely shielded from having to sexually compete with grown men. Unless "close in age exemptions" and Romeo and Julliet laws were abolished, raising the AoC would accomplish nothing except make dating easier for teenage boys by eliminating sexual competion from adults.

The best solution is to make it illegal for males of any age to date or have sex with any female who still lives with her parents or custodians except if both the female and the father/custodian give their consent.

AoC laws should be completely abolished.

Prepubescent girls aren't anywhere near as prejudiced against unattractive males as teenage girls and adult women are. Women's sexual selection instinct only fully kicks in around the age of puberty to help them avoid putting themselves into situations where they could be impregnated by men with undesirable genetics.

It's a legitimate and sensible sexual strategy for lower-tier men to seek to obtain young girls, and only women benefit from it being illegal. Until modern times, it was considered acceptable for men to buy or adopt female children for the purpose of marrying them when they reach puberty.

Based graycel

 

[Mainländer]

@Robtical @Mainländer thoughts?

I had already replied. If you support any age of consent other than menarche, you're an at least one point feminist (to make a parallel with calvinism).

OP nailed it. Many people are following ideologies, at least partially, without even knowing it. It's a good exercise to try to seek the source of your ideas and opinions.

 

[spr33]

You completely missed the point and I do not accept you to understand either way
40 percent of under age kids are having sex in developed USA EU AUSTRALIA UK CANADA yes they do understand more about sex and relationships then we incels do
In fact most 16 year olds girls have more sexual experiences and STDs then most over 20s incels in this forum

1) *expect

2) I don't care if kids have sex with each other. That's their own choice. Neither of them can consent, so neither can get in trouble anyways. Therefore, it doesn't matter. Just because children are in relationships doesn't mean they can understand what is going on or have the maturity to develop an actually meaningful one. Obviously, there are exceptions, but I'm talking mostly about kids under 15-16 years.

3) The rule is there to prevent adults from having sex with children. It is not there to prevent children from having sex with children. Adults have the maturity to manipulate children and ruin their lives, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with children.

This is a demonstrably false statement. Consent refers to the provision of approval or agreement. To claim that children are incapable of approving or agreeing to something is absurd and insane.



There are also possible negative consequences to riding in a car- the car can flip over and be set on fire, for example. Children do not comprehend these risks either, but does this mean we should ban children riding in cars on that basis? Should we ban kids from riding bicycles, skateboarding, and doing gymnastics because all those activities can and have caused injury and death?



Children, like adults, enjoy sexual activity, as the capacity for sexual gratification develops in the womb. It's common for girls to begin masturbating to orgasm when they are infants. Female fetuses have been observed masturbating in the uterus.

"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes[...]Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested." [Source]

The only ones who benefit from current AoC laws are teenage chads and normies. They are completely shielded from having to sexually compete with grown men. Unless "close in age exemptions" and Romeo and Julliet laws were abolished, raising the AoC would accomplish nothing except make dating easier for teenage boys by eliminating sexual competion from adults.

The best solution is to make it illegal for males of any age to date or have sex with any female who still lives with her parents or custodians except if both the female and the father/custodian give their consent.

AoC laws should be completely abolished.

Prepubescent girls aren't anywhere near as prejudiced against unattractive males as teenage girls and adult women are. Women's sexual selection instinct only fully kicks in around the age of puberty to help them avoid putting themselves into situations where they could be impregnated by men with undesirable genetics.

It's a legitimate and sensible sexual strategy for lower-tier men to seek to obtain young girls, and only women benefit from it being illegal. Until modern times, it was considered acceptable for men to buy or adopt female children for the purpose of marrying them when they reach puberty.

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of consent in sex. In order to consent, you must have the mental maturity and understanding to know what you are getting yourself into. Children can be easily manipulated by adults, so without the age of consent rule, adults would be raping and manipulating children all over the place.

Little Suzie here doesn't know what the hell sex is. She doesn't know the consequences. However, an adult knows.

 

[Robtical]

2) I don't care if kids have sex with each other. That's their own choice. Neither of them can consent, so neither can get in trouble anyways. Therefore, it doesn't matter. Just because children are in relationships doesn't mean they can understand what is going on or have the maturity to develop an actually meaningful one. Obviously, there are exceptions, but I'm talking mostly about kids under 15-16 years.

3) The rule is there to prevent adults from having sex with children. It is not there to prevent children from having sex with children. Adults have the maturity to manipulate children and ruin their lives, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with children.

That's bs. Young chads are a lot more sexually mature than adult non chads, and can manipulate foids a lot easier. Even cucks and whores don't care when an adult rostie fucks a 13 year old chad, because they believe he can consent. Jb foids are more mature than boys so obviously they can consent too. They have been consenting with non chad adults for thousands of years until cucks and whores started oppressing non chad men.

 

[spr33]

1) *expect

2) I don't care if kids have sex with each other. That's their own choice. Neither of them can consent, so neither can get in trouble anyways. Therefore, it doesn't matter. Just because children are in relationships doesn't mean they can understand what is going on or have the maturity to develop an actually meaningful one. Obviously, there are exceptions, but I'm talking mostly about kids under 15-16 years.

3) The rule is there to prevent adults from having sex with children. It is not there to prevent children from having sex with children. Adults have the maturity to manipulate children and ruin their lives, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with children.

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of consent in sex. In order to consent, you must have the mental maturity and understanding to know what you are getting yourself into. Children can be easily manipulated by adults, so without the age of consent rule, adults would be raping and manipulating children all over the place.

Little Suzie here doesn't know what the hell sex is. She doesn't know the consequences. However, an adult knows.

Yeah, children masturbate. So what? Why does that matter in any way?

About the "children shouldn't be able to consent to anything then." Riding in a car is different from sex. Having sex with a child is for one's own gain. A kid riding in a car is the choice of a parent or guardian who has the legal power to control what a child does. The child cannot think for themselves, so a parent can decide these things for the kid.

An adult cannot gouge out a childs' eye. This is against the law. So they don't have full control over a child, but there are aspects they can control.

That's bs. Young chads are a lot more sexually mature than adult non chads, and can manipulate foids a lot easier. Even cucks and whores don't care when an adult rostie fucks a 13 year old chad, because they believe he can consent. Jb foids are more mature than boys so obviously they can consent too. They have been consenting with non chad adults for thousands of years until cucks and whores started oppressing non chad men.

No they aren't lmao. Kids are dumb.

 

[Robtical]

No they aren't lmao. Kids are dumb.

Feminist cope. 99% of teens are smart enough to consent, the other 1% are retards.

 

[Mainländer]

Remember, it's totally fine, healthy and acceptable for teenage boys the age of jb females to have degenerate violent sex with them, even to the point that they are spit on or have their anuses ripped, but if @Mainländer @Robtical or I want to kiss or make out with one consensually it will scar them for life.

This is what cucks and feminists actually believe.

 

[Robtical]

This is what cucks and feminists actually believe.

Nothing to me is worse than a moral fag trying to "save" teen jb rosties from "evil" adult non chads.

 

[DeepSea]

2) I don't care if kids have sex with each other. That's their own choice. Neither of them can consent, so neither can get in trouble anyways. Therefore, it doesn't matter. Just because children are in relationships doesn't mean they can understand what is going on or have the maturity to develop an actually meaningful one. Obviously, there are exceptions, but I'm talking mostly about kids under 15-16 years.

This is some incoherent drivel. All sex without the provision of consent is rape, right? If, as you say, children "can't consent", then who is raping whom when two children engage in mutual genital stimulation? Do they rape each other? Or do the rapes cancel out? Why or why not?

Adults have the maturity to manipulate children and ruin their lives, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with children.

Kids can be just as manipulative as adults. In fact, I would argue that it can be easier for a kid to get another kid to have sex due to peer pressure.

Child-adult sex does not ruin children's lives—this is a myth disproven by meticulous scientific research. Society's hysterical reaction does sometimes ruin children's lives. Case in point:

Perhaps you cannot imagine this but when I was 12 I was very much in love with a man of 50 and he with me. I don't know who made the first move but we stroked each other and experienced sexuality together. It relaxed me wonderfully. One day my parents found out and the police were called in. The examination was terrible; I denied it and denied it again. Then I gave in. My older friend was arrested. My parents, after my forced confession, made out a formal complaint. Nothing could be of help any more. I have never been able to forget this. It wasn't just. It could have been such a beautiful memory. I am married and have four children. I would not object to their having sexual contacts with adults. I regard it as positive. (Love and attraction: an international conference, p. 501.)

In 1999, a massive peer-reviewed meta-analysis of the effects of "child sexual abuse" was published in the most prestigious psychological journal in America. It reached the following conclusion:

"Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Meta-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However, this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, FE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became non-significant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported."

Yeah, children masturbate. So what? Why does that matter in any way?

Because young children, like teenagers and adults, are sexual beings who enjoy and desire sexual activity- they are not asexual.

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of consent in sex. In order to consent, you must have the mental maturity and understanding to know what you are getting yourself into. Children can be easily manipulated by adults, so without the age of consent rule, adults would be raping and manipulating children all over the place.

This is a non sequitor. A fully developed mind is not a necessary prerequisite for understanding what sex is.

There are no immediate consequences of sex other than pleasure and orgasm. Assuring a lack of negative outcomes like STDs, pregnancy, etc, should be the responsibility of the father or guardian of the child. Much like, although a child is not aware of the possible ramifications of riding a vehicle (injury, death), this does not mean they should not ride vehicles—it just means their guardian should ensure that these ramifications do not occur.

Little Suzie here doesn't know what the hell sex is. She doesn't know the consequences. However, an adult knows.

Even fucking mole rats "understand" what sex is, and you're saying kids don't? What exactly is so incredibly complex about sex- i.e. mutually pleasurable bodily touching- that kids are unable to understand?

 

[Currycel25]

1) *expect

2) I don't care if kids have sex with each other. That's their own choice. Neither of them can consent, so neither can get in trouble anyways. Therefore, it doesn't matter. Just because children are in relationships doesn't mean they can understand what is going on or have the maturity to develop an actually meaningful one. Obviously, there are exceptions, but I'm talking mostly about kids under 15-16 years.

3) The rule is there to prevent adults from having sex with children. It is not there to prevent children from having sex with children. Adults have the maturity to manipulate children and ruin their lives, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with children.

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of consent in sex. In order to consent, you must have the mental maturity and understanding to know what you are getting yourself into. Children can be easily manipulated by adults, so without the age of consent rule, adults would be raping and manipulating children all over the place.

Little Suzie here doesn't know what the hell sex is. She doesn't know the consequences. However, an adult knows.w

Agann you are wrong people don't have sex based on mental maturity but looks
Also yes I completely understand the meaning of consent and I reject it
Little Suzie assuming she is 15 had already taken up more dicks then I can count on my fingers
And no there is something called sex ed she completed knows what sex is lol retard

 

[spr33]

Agann you are wrong people don't have sex based on mental maturity but looks
Also yes I completely understand the meaning of consent and I reject it
Little Suzie assuming she is 15 had already taken up more dicks then I can count on my fingers
And no there is something called sex ed she completed knows what sex is lol retard

I'm assuming you want to lower the age of consent to like 13 then.

Let me ask a question then.

Do you think 5 year old girls chase chad cock. Like do you seriously think a five year old would look at a guy and think "Oh they're hot I want to sleep with them"

 

[Mainländer]

1) *expect

2) I don't care if kids have sex with each other. That's their own choice. Neither of them can consent, so neither can get in trouble anyways. Therefore, it doesn't matter. Just because children are in relationships doesn't mean they can understand what is going on or have the maturity to develop an actually meaningful one. Obviously, there are exceptions, but I'm talking mostly about kids under 15-16 years.

3) The rule is there to prevent adults from having sex with children. It is not there to prevent children from having sex with children. Adults have the maturity to manipulate children and ruin their lives, so obviously they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with children.

Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of consent in sex. In order to consent, you must have the mental maturity and understanding to know what you are getting yourself into. Children can be easily manipulated by adults, so without the age of consent rule, adults would be raping and manipulating children all over the place.

Little Suzie here doesn't know what the hell sex is. She doesn't know the consequences. However, an adult knows.

Holy shit, we actually have a "Chad Jr. can screw JBs in all holes, I don't care, but as an adult you'll traumatize her for life if you kiss her" retard here. I miss the times in which such agecucked trash was kicked back to Reddit where it belongs. I seriously hope it's a foid infiltrate, because men unironically being that cucked and retarded is sad af. Anyways, all I can do is add to ignore list until mods start banning such types again.

 

[spr33]

Holy shit, we actually have a "Chad Jr. can screw JBs in all holes, I don't care, but as an adult you'll traumatize her for life if you kiss her" retard here. I miss the times in which such agecucked trash was kicked back to Reddit where it belongs. I seriously hope it's a foid infiltrate, because men unironically being that cucked and retarded is sad af. Anyways, all I can do is add to ignore list until mods start banning such types again.

Found the pedophile. Go fuck off. It's really a simple concept that a 30 yr old guy fucking a 3 year old isn't ok.

 

[Dregster]

agreed. but i feel it's pointless to talk about old ways when the ruling class has different plans. right now you can still try to reach a reasonable audience as an individual over the web to try and convince others of your idea that runs contrary to that of the ruling class. but that won't be the case for much longer. as the global surveillance apparatus tightens, any such opinions will be taken care of very quickly.

this might not be too relevant for some people on here like myself who don't plan to live to old age, but i'll state it for those that have different plans: you aren't going to help anyone by suggesting controversial reforms, they will never happen and you'll only be putting a bullseye target over yourself.

When the fuck did this dude leave??

 

[Mainländer]

It's really a simple concept that a 30 yr old guy fucking a 3 year old isn't ok.

And where did I say it was? 3 yos obviously shouldn't be fucking anyone. I was talking about JBs. If you think it's ok that young Chads ravish teenage girls in all holes but if an older guy even kisses her it's not ok, then you're a feminist retard.

 

[Wiz32BlackJiggaboo]

on the matter of age of consent as we all know most biological women are mentally physically and emotionally inferior to men at any age
Women literally fuck dogs and gangsters and thugs

TBH don't really take issue with women who want to let dogs fuck them, it's the ones who fuck the thugs/gangsters that bother me more.

Thugs/gangers might murder me and shit, a dog isn't going to do me any harm. Going after the dog-fuckers is low-hanging fruit and shouldn't be a priority for us TBH.

and lack self-preservation protocols

Unsure about that: fucking the thug/ganster capable of killing others could be a good preservation protocal in many cases when society is crumbling.

So it's very stupid to say a women can only consent at 18 she can't and shouldn't at any age

Why shouldn't she, at any age?

Women are capable of at least learning certain facts enough to recite them that we can hope she understands them.

Stuff like "here are STDs which exist and which you can get via sex without protection" or "here is what the STDs do and why it's good to avoid them"

Maybe some other basic warnings about how chad is an asshole and you should date an incel.

The bar doesn't need to be set ridiculously high, but it should definitely be based on knowledge and not age.

You don't just automatically get permission to do other dangerous stuff like driving/surgery because you're old enough, so why should sex be different?

 

[spr33]

And where did I say it was? 3 yos obviously shouldn't be fucking anyone. I was talking about JBs. If you think it's ok that young Chads ravish teenage girls in all holes but if an older guy even kisses her it's not ok, then you're a feminist retard.

Oh no I'm perfectly fine with lowering the age of consent to around 12-13. I'm just saying we need one and shouldn't get rid of it.

 

[WØLF]

 

[Lolimancer]

 

[WØLF]

wtf is this easter egg shit bro

What do you mean by "easter egg"?

 

[Lolimancer]

View attachment 490366

What do you mean by "easter egg"?