JFL After shitting on incels, "counter extremist experts" shift to Andrew Tate

[AsiaCel]

Tate, as shallow and unpleasant he is, has never called for attacks and his followers has never attacked anyone in the name of him.

The Jews won't leave men alone, will they?

Slipping Through the Cracks: Recognising Extremist Misogyny Outside of Inceldom - GNET

gnet-research.org

 

[Hexagon77]

Both worship the devil and manipulate incels. I wouldn't be concerned about him at all considering the fact that they hate us and will try to get rid of us in any way possible whether there are nigger grifters to rally behind or not.

 

[AsiaCel]

Both worship the devil and manipulate incels

Hmm I wonder what kind of people worship the devil.

And while Tate manipulate incels, he is more of a redpiller. The redpill spreading is good because it prompts people to try and in the process most of them will fail, leading to them to flock to the blackpill which is where the frens are.

 

[AsiaCel]

Unsurprisingly, the article calls for more censorship than there already is.

Recommendations and Conclusions

To combat this type of online misogyny, this discussion broadly supports the approaches to content moderation policies outlined in Bundtzen’s report surrounding measures to mitigate online gender-based violence. To add to this recommendation, it would be helpful for this moderation to specify typologies of misogynist hate, categorising subcultures within the manosphere to produce specific data results on the dissemination and engagement with such content. A better focus on moderation and categorisation of hate espoused by figures like Tate is worth consideration both due to the danger of misogyny as an ideology itself and due to its common position as a ‘gateway’ ideology into other forms of extremism. This is tackled most importantly through the reviewing of current content moderation policies to include specific forms of misogynist hate, as this results in both a practical resolution in improved regulation of misogynist content as well as a more holistic aspect which Bundtzen acknowledges that misogynist content exists on the scale of extremist violence and ideology.

By examining hustle culture and Pick Up Artistry, and recognising that Tate, an influential and openly misogynistic public figure, aligns more closely with these than with inceldom, it becomes clear that ‘incel’ as a catch-all term oversimplifies a highly nuanced online male supremacist subculture. Oversimplifying this type of subculture makes it difficult to orient preventative measures towards their specific needs and nuances or fully understand the culture’s complexities. In neglecting to analyse the full scope of the threat posed by actors in the manosphere, individuals like Tate ‘slip through the cracks’ and evade the attention of policymakers and researchers studying this domain.

 

[Hexagon77]

Hmm I wonder what kind of people worship the devil.

And while Tate manipulate incels, he is more of a redpiller. The redpill spreading is good because it prompts people to try and in the process most of them will fail, leading to them to flock to the blackpill which is where the frens are.

Muslims and Jews. And the redpill is still hostile towards incels they still use us as an insult and the few that do flock to the blackpill are annoying normie zoomer types that learned about it on tiktok.