So why should we support your system if you don't even pretend to have a solution to our problems?
Try harder next time Danilov.
Accept it or Not, Incels.co is a Radical Leftist Board
Try harder next time Danilov.
>discrimination by being born with something you cannot change and blaming the entire world
so by making incels superior you're going to think its going to fix all the problems? Your focus is not on ending gynocentrism but just destroying for the sake of destroying just like leftists trying to change for the sake of changing.
I don't disagree with this, but there are a far larger amount of poor chads and foids than there are rich incels. Why should richcels subsidize the sexual exploits of poor chads?
Why should the man on the right subsidize the man (and his harem and his kids) on the left?
I have advocated for no system. I remarked this board engages in leftist analysis and that leftist revolution and incel rebellion sometimes overlap. In fact, I said the system is unimportant, and the transitionary period of chaos is what matters. I also said there can be right wing incel rebellion.
there's no such thing as leftist rebellions overlapping with other rebellions when you're establishing an entirely different govenment, just say you're anti establishment and rebelling against gynocentrism (which goes against a what a leftist rebellion establishes after a rebellion)
Incoherent nonsense.
a leftist rebellion establishes communism which is gynocentric. leftist rebellions don't overlap with incel or right wing rebellions.
If you speak very broadly in class terms relating to those who have lots of sex and those who don't, yes it does. But that does not make it leftist per se, only that it uses class dialectic in a very unconventional way (most leftists deny hypergamy even exists).
The point of revolution is to overturn the current system. An incel rebellion is one that specifically seeks to overthrow gynocracy. Leftist revolutions don't do this. The overlap according to you is some random rapes that happen.
Only for personal reasons (rape). Nothing permanent to actually fix the sexual market on a widespread scale.
As an aside, do you consider fucking a prostitute ascension? What do you consider ascension personally?
Your unintelligent rage provoked by someone saying "leftism" not following "is bad" has made you retarded. Do you think a communist revolution is forever? Once communism has been established, it is no longer a revolution, and it is no longer an incel rebellion. It is simply the way things are. In order to revolt or rebel, you need to revolt or rebel against something. What would the communist incels be revolting against under communism, themselves? JFL. Both revolution and rebellion reside only in the transitionary insurrection which is not in itself gynocentric, and often involves lawless incel activities, such as rape.
L
Houellebecq is a madlad, his quotes are by far the best thing that the world has to offer. Want to read his work "Whatever" again and this time without breaks and as a physical book. He is the guy who understands inceldom better than all the "experts" who want to study us.
"The thesis is that the sexual revolution of the Sixties created not communism but capitalism in the sexual market, that the unattractive underclass is exiled while the privileged initiates are drained by corruption, sloth, and excess."
Another quote from Ted Bundy is also something that comes to mind: He once said that the greatest obstacle towards the freedom of a person is the freedom of others. Despite his deeds one must agree that these are true words. The freedom of others (especially when it comes without responsibilities/restrictions) is what makes others unfree - this can be seen in economics/social dynamics.
You don't even need to resort to laws or physical violence - for example in our technocracy: when someone says something against you, just ban his account without justification, because it's your place and you make the rules. You do nothing but refuse/deny to service a person, but because of your monopoly status you essentially just ended his career and his potential to change something. With nothing more than absolute freedom and without having to change a law you influence democracy in your direction and get your will. And you didn't put anyone in shackles (physically speaking) - you don't have to put others in jail/shackles to end their freedom, this would be seen on a macroscopical level and could mean bad optics, you can work in far more subtle ways to essentially eliminate them without having to risk backlash or without getting your hands dirty and displaying cold/hard honesty.
Or on a more fundamental level: The freedom of others is ALWAYS at the direct expense of another person. The luck of others isn't your luck, it's your bad luck because we live on a planet with finite ressources (e.g. food/shelter/water/mating partners/etc.) and every ressource that is consumed by another person can't be used by you and vice versa. Everything you do comes at the (in-)direct expense of other people, by allowing yourself to live you deny these opportunities to others. The affirmation of your own life indirectly implies denying the rights/liberties of other people. For every "Yes!", there is also a "No!" that is (in-)directly implied by it.
This.
Last edited:
They are also almost always gynocentric as well though. They just frame it differently. The evolutionary framework is preserved and the embers of feminism/gynocentrism are not extinguished, so they will relight as soon as the oppurtunity presents itself.
you're okay with accepting gynocentrism once it becomes the status quo under communism? Thats not rebelling against gynocentrism at all.
L
This. There is (almost) no political ideology that unironically supports low-status males. For extremists we are canon fodder, moderates (and most modern leftists) despise us and most right-wingers call us whiny and are completely enfatuated with their "Pull yourself up by your bootstraps"-Mentality which is only a result of western individualism that is based on the false prerequisite that all people are born equal. And while leftists see the lie of meritocracy in our economy they spew the same neoliberal bullshit of self-improvement at us when it comes to social dynamics, because they are socially successful and therefore have no initiative to change the current system.
Holy shit you're fucking brainwashed.
Oh it’s up there alright maybe you should try looking for it or else it’s gonna rot up your ass
We are the disposables. Surplus males meant to oil the machinery with our blood and sweat. Beasts of burden. The only solutions that suit our needs are so radical that they will never be implemented, as they contradict millions of years evolutionary pressure. Only technology will liberate us from our humanity and lead us out of our slavery to the gynocentric order.
i just disagree with your notion that an incel rebellion somehow overlaps with an ideology like communism, which doesn't support low value males at all.
The rhetoric we use about the unfair sexual market place does sometimes sound like how marxists talk about economic injustice. But that's about it, and no communist has ever proposed a "redistribution" of sex.
I think the overwhelming majority of us have mostly rightwing views like being against feminism, pro guns, pro gender roles, against political correctness, against welfare for single moms.
penislossus, that shit is going to rot your mind
I do not consider fucking a prostitute to be ascension, because prostitution has nothing to do with incels ascending their social and sexual status (rather it is more like an affirmation of its lowliness and impoverishment given that it must be supplemented with money in order to receive sex).
Last edited:
L
It's mostly a partnership of convenience with right-wingers. We share more goals with them than with modern left-wingers - and that's why we support them, because we get our will at least partially realized by doing so. We support them because we maximize our own advantage and further our own agenda. They have the maximal probability of success when it comes to realizing our goals at least partially and denying yourself an advantage is cucked.
Just think about it logically: What is more likely? That there will be a new, radical left-wing movement that wants to further the goals of ugly males and that throws feminism as the golden calf of leftism under the bus that will then gain critical mass as a grass-root movement and win or that some right-winger succeeds who has at least partially goals that overlap with ours? You have to make a compromise between ideological overlaps and probability of success. And at least for me the latter scenario sounds more plausible.
Is OP talking about communism still? Does he not realize communism isn’t just an economic theory but a social one as well? Realistically every “left wing” economically incel on this forum should be a natsoc. Idk how u can support modern communism or socialist parties when they support no borders and feminism and shit. National socialism is communism without being fucking retarded and raped by third world monkey poopoo skins and kikes
Last edited:
OP thinks communism and leftism can overlap with incel rebellions, i think he's just spouting those talking points. I don't think he supports full on communism.
Incel rebellion when the govt takes all of your guns and decides a Congolese 6’9 George floyd lookalike who doesn’t know English is going to sleep in your shack because we’re all equal and the same
yes you can have a congolese 6'9 george floyd lookalike who wants free gibs and hates your culture, but as long as he hates women, he's based according to .co because .co thinks we're equal as long as we have the same subhuman skin color; "muh based currycels and ricel brothas heckin incellerino rebellerino" while those same currycels and ricecels vote biden who wants to take away your rights, just fucking lol
This is true. People like to take the “I wanna cut your cock off but I hate women so I’m based” approach here. Did you see the thread where someone said a group of Afrocentric black supremacists who thought they were the kangz of Egypt and Greece and China but who also fucked the MGTOW community by calling them racist were based because they hate women?
I dont hate whites
I envy them
Yeah that IMBOR thread. They're not incel allies and would backstab us even if we somehow teamed up and put women in their place just fucking lol at those kangz
>The ultimate goal is to create a global brazil
FUCK FUCK FUCK
We are similar but we hate the opposite gender
All I see in this example are thugmaxxed gopniks being used as troops for some failed ideology.
I live in slavlands and the kind of apes like that have no problem getting sex or prospering here, in fact you need to be like that to some degree to be even taken seriously by foids there.
What's next, random fuckboy mobster in poland or some shithole like brazil who has le badboy foids chasing after him is peforming incel rebelion if he decides to shoot men and rape women in some households bacause his boss told him to? JFL, some of you really bought into IT memes about incels I see.
fuck off commie.you are crazy if you think being right and doing the right thing has anything to do with being one of your kind.
i don't hate ethnics, only notable user who hates ethnics is @BummerDrummer, but if you want to self victimize i see no problem
Okay, I wont
@BummerDrummer doesn't hate ethnics, cope.
he seems to be white nationalist, so it was my guess
A white nationalist isn't the same as racist. I understand the sentiment of not wanting foreigners in your country. Anyone who argues this is just low IQ.
most of them are thought, no dutch, white nationalist would you want in their country
Dutch people tend to be more liberal regarding foreigners as long as you adopt their values though. White nationalism isn't really popular here.
Communism is an utopian system it will never work. Though we should strive for it to work as it is a reflection of our own qualities and failures.
cope you will never be accepted by them, just like myself
What's your race?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
