Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill A Woman's Obtainability is NOT Correlated with Her Desirability

  • Thread starter Deleted member 14382
  • Start date
Deleted member 14382

Deleted member 14382

Self-banned
-
Joined
Sep 24, 2018
Posts
2,262
A 50 year-old hideous hambeast, with warts on her face, will reject you just as fast as a 22 year-old Victoria's Secret model. Her instinctual reaction to non-Chad men will be identical to the supermodel's.

What the hell makes people think that, just because a woman is undesirable, she's going to be more sexually charitable??
She's hardwired EXACTLY the same way as every other goddamn woman on the planet!

This popular misconception that pursuing less attractive women will result in a higher success rate really needs to die a horrible death, because nothing could be further from the truth. I don't even know where this ridiculously fallacious notion even came from. Normies need to wake the fuck up to reality.

You can "lower your standards" as much as you want, that doesn't mean the ugly foid you're targeting will lower hers.
 
Last edited:
yee girls always date up they may not get their ideal but definitely more than they deserve
 
Women are hypergamous as fuck nowadays and social medias have definitely something to do with it (sounds pretty cliché I know but it's nothing can be further from the truth)
 
Social media is to blame. Hambeasts in the 1990's knew all they would get is bottom tier guys ~2/10. Then the internet came and we see a flood of simps and pussy beggars above the 3/10 range begging an infertile obese bushpig for dates, nude pictures and sex.
 
I'd honestly say a foids attainability ("obtainability") remains relatively constant with desirability although there is a minuscule increase in the middle and at the far ends there's clearly a difference.

103008


On the upper end of the spectrum, you've got the model tier foids.
They have a plethora of whiteknights and thirsty fucks that would do anything to be in the same vicinity as the foid - Just look at any foid's comments on Instagram with more than 1 million followers: Plastic made whore example.
Your average foid doesn't get that much attention unless she goes through excessive plastic surgery or is just a top-tier stacy. Giga-stacy?

On the lower end of the spectrum, you've got the genetically deformed foids. The foids that men will still go for because of juggernaut law.

Now for guys:
103010
 
Very thoughtful post.
 
I'd honestly say a foids attainability ("obtainability") remains relatively constant with desirability although there is a minuscule increase in the middle and at the far ends there's clearly a difference.

View attachment 103008

On the upper end of the spectrum, you've got the model tier foids.
They have a plethora of whiteknights and thirsty fucks that would do anything to be in the same vicinity as the foid - Just look at any foid's comments on Instagram with more than 1 million followers: Plastic made whore example.
Your average foid doesn't get that much attention unless she goes through excessive plastic surgery or is just a top-tier stacy. Giga-stacy?

On the lower end of the spectrum, you've got the genetically deformed foids. The foids that men will still go for because of juggernaut law.

Now for guys:
View attachment 103010
INCELS ARE NOT ON THIS BECAUSE IT NEVER BEGAN
Feynman IQ
 
Social media is to blame. Hambeasts in the 1990's knew all they would get is bottom tier guys ~2/10. Then the internet came and we see a flood of simps and pussy beggars above the 3/10 range begging an infertile obese bushpig for dates, nude pictures and sex.
Worst thing to ever happen. I never touched any social media except Facebook
 
Cope. Stop putting normalfags on the same level as us. Lower tier normals are starting to become incel for sure but anybody above 40 percentile has a chance
 
Lol at people that think there’s any variation in mate choice criteria, among species, let alone members of the same species.
 
What the hell makes people think that, just because a woman is undesirable, she's going to be more sexually charitable??
I don't know, but hasn't there been a study that found, that on average, ugly people were thought to be more promiscuous? I guess that logic could make some sense, but it does not correlate with the real world.
 
I don't know, but hasn't there been a study that found, that on average, ugly people were thought to be more promiscuous? I guess that logic could make some sense, but it does not correlate with the real world.
They may be more promiscuous, but with good-looking guys, NOT with us!
Most people assume that a promiscuous woman is an undiscriminating one. Not the case at all. She is every bit as selective and hypergamous as any other woman.
Lol at people that think there’s any variation in mate choice criteria, among species, let alone members of the same species.
Exactly. All women are hypergamous, regardless of how ugly they themselves are.
 
100% true, i already tryed going after ugly foids, i was rejected brutaly
 
100% true, i already tryed going after ugly foids, i was rejected brutaly
If you're going to approach at all, you might as well approach the hottest girls you can find. Your chances with them are exactly the same as with ugly girls.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top