A richfag who sits on his ass spending money all day is objectively contributing to society more than a wagecuck.

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

Wagecucks defend their jobs by saying they're "contributing to society" and "being a productive citizen" but unironically a rich NEET who spends all day blowing his parents money is actually contributing more to society than a wagecuck because the economy benefits far more from people spending money than it does from one extra codemonkey or car insurance salesman

That's unironically the economic reason that many of those jobs exist in the first place. People having income and spending money stimulates the economy. The "work" they do is useless and irrelevant on its own

 

[Diddy]

So escortmaxxers contribute to society more than Cali FAANG codeniggers?

 

[LeFrenchCel]

A richfag that gets money by wageslaving other people doesn't contribute shit.

Proletarians built this world, not richfags.

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

So escortmaxxers contribute to society more than Cali FAANG codeniggers?

yes

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

That tells you a lot about society and why you shouldn't give a shit about it

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

A richfag that gets money by wageslaving other people doesn't contribute shit.

Proletarians built this world, not richfags.

"Proletarians" as described by Marx just means industrial workers. Most wagecucks in the first world aren't proletarians. People think proletarians means like "the 99%" nowadays because no one actually reads or cares what that old fuck wrote

Like peasants are counterrevolutionary and the proletarians are supposed to oppress them in their dictatorship

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

no one actually reads or cares what that old fuck wrote

 

[LeFrenchCel]

"Proletarians" as described by Marx just means industrial workers. Most wagecucks in the first world aren't proletarians. People think proletarians means like "the 99%" nowadays because no one actually reads or cares what that old fuck wrote

I meant that underpaid workers contribute more to soyciety than a lazy fuck who got his money and status from his richfag ancestry.

 

[Murder Mario]

I meant that underpaid workers contribute more to soyciety than a lazy fuck who got his money and status from his richfag ancestry.

Not really. OP has a point that spending money stimulates the economy.

 

[ShiiOfTheSPLC]

I meant that underpaid workers contribute more to soyciety than a lazy fuck who got his money and status from his richfag ancestry.

>The thousands of layoffs in Big Tech are thanks to an overhiring spree to satisfy the “vanity” of bosses at the likes of Meta and Alphabet, according to a member of the so-called PayPal Mafia.
>“There’s nothing for these people to do—it’s all fake work. Now that’s being exposed, what do these people actually do, they go to meetings.”
>The DoorDash investor added Google had intentionally hired engineers and tech talent to stop them from being snapped up by competitors. The downside, Rabois said, was that the new hires just had to “be entitled, sit at their desks, and do nothing.”
>Rabois suggested that this was not a bad strategy, even going as far as to say that hiring skilled workers to keep them out of competitor’s offices is “pretty coherent.”

This is a good example of a "job" that objectively has 0 societal output and has nothing to do with proletarians conceptually. Most wagecuck jobs in the first world are fundamentally similar to this. The economic contribution that these people make by spending money is genuinely far greater than anything they actually do at their workplace

 

[Caesercel]

I refuse to spend money and simulate the cucknomy. Money is power and I am keeping mine as far as the jew overlords allow.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

yup dollar velocity is major key