Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

A liberalized sexual culture = more Darwinian culture = fewer sexual opportunities for average males

incel-american

incel-american

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Posts
765
Choke on that black pill, normies.
 
Yea. While earlier the 3/10 female would settle for the 3/10 man now she'd go for at least a 8/10 chadlite. And so on the 5/10 average goes for the 10/10 chadlord.
Harsh reality of things.
 
True. Average guys know this but won't ever speak up.
 
The middle class is shrinking. Normies are going to become the new incels if this continues.
 
reducing the tinder gini coefficient is necessary for advanced civilization to function
 
you wont change any normies opinion on personality rofl
 
Only it isn't darwinian because of welfare and modern medicine that allows weaklings to survive and the other races to breed like rats vastly replacing whites who by all rights should still be the dominant group if we hadn't artificially uplifted the other races (with the exception of Asians who have similarly low birth rates).
 
Only it isn't darwinian because of welfare and modern medicine that allows weaklings to survive and the other races to breed like rats vastly replacing whites who by all rights should still be the dominant group if we hadn't artificially uplifted the other races (with the exception of Asians who have similarly low birth rates).
Go recruit for your cause elsewhere, Nazi scum.
 
Only it isn't darwinian because of welfare and modern medicine that allows weaklings to survive and the other races to breed like rats vastly replacing whites who by all rights should still be the dominant group if we hadn't artificially uplifted the other races (with the exception of Asians who have similarly low birth rates).

>black people are stronger and more physically strong that white race
>latinos have a mix of al races traits,perks and problems
>asians have a slightly higher IQ and a more disciplined culture
>whites are a good average between them

there isnt superior races,that isnt darwinism at all
there are only races with better specific adaptions to their enviroment
a monkey is useless in the water and a fish is useless in land,that doenst make them inferior in a absulute level,just inadaptated to the enviroment

and now a lot of this adaptations are useless/meaningless because our enviroments are artificial

so your pride in white race is just cope
sorry but someone had it to tell you
 
>black people are stronger and more physically strong that white race
>latinos have a mix of al races traits,perks and problems
>asians have a slightly higher IQ and a more disciplined culture
>whites are a good average between them

there isnt superior races,that isnt darwinism at all
there are only races with better specific adaptions to their enviroment
a monkey is useless in the water and a fish is useless in land,that doenst make them inferior in a absulute level,just inadaptated to the enviroment

and now a lot of this adaptations are useless/meaningless because our enviroments are artificial

so your pride in white race is just cope
sorry but someone had it to tell you

> black people have low IQ's.
> Africans didn't have the wheel, written language or two storey buildings before whites
> Whites ruled the entire world. 6 out of 7 people only exist today because of whites.

Whites do ok in water. We have ships, submarines, scuba gear. Whites do ok on land. We invented cars, roads. etc Whites invented airplanes and helicopters. So we do ok in the air. Whites have adapted to every environment on earth in order to colonise and rule its people and bring them civilisation.
 
I dont care about average men, but it leaves us with NO opportunities
 
Repeating the mistakes of the past. I'm not religious but I'd admit that all religions are basically a handbook as to how to create a stable society. There is no religion that says it is okay to commit adultery. ell, for the woman at least. There are some ancient religions that require women to have sex with any man who asks in some situations, but that is just another way to prevent incels from forming. Even in matriarchal societies them men are pretty much freely allowed to fuck because sexless men create problems.
 
> black people have low IQ's.
> Africans didn't have the wheel, written language or two storey buildings before whites
> Whites ruled the entire world. 6 out of 7 people only exist today because of whites.

Whites do ok in water. We have ships, submarines, scuba gear. Whites do ok on land. We invented cars, roads. etc Whites invented airplanes and helicopters. So we do ok in the air. Whites have adapted to every environment on earth in order to colonise and rule its people and bring them civilisation.

>that arent examples of genetic superiority but of civilization superiority

i repeat,artificial designed enviroments make genetic superiority useless
intelligence,charisma.strenght all of that can be created in a laboratory
you can apeal the card of ''superior genetics'' at the same time of the card of ''superior civilization''

because the same idea of civilization (artificial social and physical enviroments) go against ''natural selection''

and at the beginin you said:

Only it isn't darwinian because of welfare and modern medicine that allows weaklings to survive and the other races to breed like rats vastly replacing whites who by all rights should still be the dominant group if we hadn't artificially uplifted the other races (with the exception of Asians who have similarly low birth rates).

but later you said:

> black people have low IQ's.

Whites do ok in water. We have ships, submarines, scuba gear. Whites do ok on land. We invented cars, roads. etc Whites invented airplanes and helicopters. So we do ok in the air. Whites have adapted to every environment on earth in order to colonise and rule its people and bring them civilisation.

do you see the inconsistence there?

and western civilizations werent a absolute better that had existed
it had there advances areas and their lacks

a example is astronomy
in america several civilization had a astronomy techniques even if they lack technology material

or the consructions techniques of egypts and incas was better than anything that europeans had ever did
(excep for catedrals,that are fucking masterpieces)

about my last afirmation:

''When the earthquake shook southern Peru on May 21, 1950, the old town of Cuzco was devastated, but the stone foundations without agglutinators on which the city was erected remained in place: they were the mines of temple walls and palaces built by the Incas before the Spanish Conquest.

The Inca builders built their walls with such perfection that they resisted the shaking and remained unscathed; just a few joints moved away slightly.

The blocks of stone, some of 100 tons of weight, were carved without iron tools, but with such an exact adjustment that it is not possible to measure the blade of a knife between the joints.''

or the fact that several sud and central american cultures had
cultive balconys ,a agrarian technique years ahead of europe and asia

i repeat every culture have his own powers and lack

now

''our civilization is the best because is the winer/bigger/strongest''

-greek,egyiptian,mycenics,hitites civilizations lost a lot of power,knowledge,culture and even some of them were completly destroyed by agressive migrations of the ''sea people'' even if they were more advanced (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pueblos_del_mar)
-ancient rome and greek was a great civilization but fell under inner corruption and barbarians hordes
-japan and chinese were culturally rich countrys,yet their political and militar power was a joke against western countrys ins the 18 and 19 centuries
-medieval islamic countrys had a grat culture and science knowledge compared to their christians partners at the same moment
,yet they fall in the ultra religious decadency of today
-medicine,architecture,knowledge cultures etc had been lost,destroyed or transformed trough ages
-europe is now invaded by refugges

not always the winner is the better

and now,if you truly believe in social darwinism
then inceldom isnt a problem ,is just the natural way og things
femoids choose the better individuals under their own expectations (the stronger,the ones with better looks,the richer etc)

dude
stop coping so hard abut race superiority
the mere concept of civilization go against social darwinism
because a civilization is a social and artificial structure that go against the primal chaos of natural selection
so saying that white race (naturale selection) is the better because they created a great civilization (artificial enviroment tht nulifie the need of natural selection)
is contradictory

(''great'' ,not the better,because as the examples showed before,western ancient civilization was outmached in some aspect by some cultures ,but they outmached that same cultures in other aspects)

btw i will atach some images of the incas walls,the christian chatedrals,ans the cultive balconys
 

Attachments

  • Moray.jpg
    Moray.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 46
  • Moray.jpg
    Moray.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 50
  • Facade_de_la_Cathédrale_de_Reims_-_Parvis.jpg
    Facade_de_la_Cathédrale_de_Reims_-_Parvis.jpg
    503.5 KB · Views: 55
  • inca walls.jpg
    inca walls.jpg
    103.3 KB · Views: 46

Similar threads

BSGMANLET
Replies
17
Views
394
DarkStar
DarkStar
Liu KANG
Replies
14
Views
385
over_department
over_department
Nordicel94
Replies
28
Views
842
FishmanBecker
FishmanBecker
Stupid Clown
Replies
16
Views
651
VintageCarCoper
VintageCarCoper

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top