Nothing's changed
Its not really any different even today. Women are just constantly jumping on chads dicks. Chads own the harem of stacies and roasties, so much so that normies and simps either get cucked or fail paternity tests
Being a chad is like living in a porno movie
Impossible. Without laws those 16 men would have killed that 1 Chad. What I believe is that between infant deaths, diseases, battles and famine only 1 man every 17 lived long enough to be a strong adult capable to rape a primitive foid without getting caught or killed by other competitors.
Yes, though it seems they intended to spin the data posted earlier despite having easy-to-read population frequencies.
I mean that’s what we are doingI don't understand how people still don't get this. Lol, imagine 17 guys just standing aside and saying to themselves, "Hey guys, we are genetically inferior, let the Chad impregnate all the foids, while we just rot, okay?" Other guys: "Yeah, okay, good idea bro.
The agricultural revolution was a beta uprising. Suddenly meek, high inhib but hard working males had a survival advantage, which then led to incel races like ricecels.
I think MSM are pushing these historical revisionism for an agenda. In the long run, they serve not to black-pill men, tho, but enable foids to become more hypergamous and whorish unapologetically.
could be fake news so females push their agenda further
This is what many don't understand, harems are the biological norm for humans. Men built society around marriage etc in order to reward and incentivise men to be good little worker drones and to stop them killing each other competing for females. We're just regressing to the norm.
This is literally why women's bodily autonomy needs to be forcibly taken away from them. Women would/will make humanity go extinct if they are allowed to make the decisions. They would all fuck the same Chad, and then in 2 or 3 generations the entire population would be retards and die off because of diseases and mutations due to inbreeding.
very interesting find
truly pathetic the human race is stuck on dos mode version 1.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
despite MUH TECHNOLOGY AND MUH EQUALITY
IT TRULY MEANS NOTHING IN THESE RINGFENCED AREAS
Proof that hypergamy is natural and that's why humanity needs rules to control that shit.
Right, the natural order before this was chad hunter gatherer, normie nomadic steppe herder, incel middle eastern farmer.
I noticed the same thing when I talked to foids about evolutionary biology. They use it to belittle men and justify their own hypergamy. They don't possess the empathy and compassion to work for a better future.
Yeah and we are getting back there. Everything is falling apart, it's gonna be a free for all purely based on who's the tallest and strongest. Back to the stone age.
indeed
I have read this article before the problem is people are mistaking this as being cavemen times the article clearly states this happened right after the agricultural revolution so I don't know what to say of this or what happened during prehistoric times maybe it is purposely done to muddle up scientific data with wrong history to make it seem like a product of something else
this means we are descendants of chadlodite fuck off incels I’m genetically a chad and that’s what women want.
fuck off incels I’m genetically a chad and that’s what women want.
You can't alter female nature, but, it seems normiemen are starting to gradually waking up to toilet's depravity. However i don't have much hope for beta uprising. Things will, most likely, get much worse.
Yeah this is an old one but goodie, its hilarious how much people cope saying its bs. This is exactly how things are without religion interference to force monogamy.
Its also how the blue eyes mutation spread, basically there was one 6´4 guy , the chad type, main hero, strong and brave, who everyone looked up to to keeping them safe, and the rest were losers, they just helped collect berries, hunt, doing fire, etc, but all the woman flocked to Chad Flinstone.
Same thing as animals, the leader ape gets all, the rest gets to look, or leave and go rot alone somewhere, absolutely brootal.
Its also how the blue eyes mutation spread, basically there was one 6´4 guy , the chad type, main hero, strong and brave, who everyone looked up to to keeping them safe, and the rest were losers, they just helped collect berries, hunt, doing fire, etc, but all the woman flocked to Chad Flinstone.
Same thing as animals, the leader ape gets all, the rest gets to look, or leave and go rot alone somewhere, absolutely brootal.
Yet, they are the actual bottleneck.
Lots of tyrants lived through the ages, and lots of wars. Still they number looks too ridiculous. Even in this supposed modern age, where hypergamy is at it's peak, it's not the case. Clear as day, irrelevant of how much truth to it, they are pushing these data to enable more hypergamy that is if there's any more room for it.
Also, could explain why those civilisations are no more.
pre history involves archaeology and anthropology.
we already know a lot about the few hunter gatherers and tribes today in isolated places.
inequality only started to really ratchet up after civilization and we are at the end point right now imo. its simply not sustainable today where foids are only going for the roughly top 15 to 30% of men. men that are a combination of tall, good looking, and rich.
early state formation fundamentally implies slavery imo. whether that be through leaders conjuring lies to people about divine right to rule or using military force to circumscribe a population. and of course, a ruler that uses military force to circumscribe his population (because if he didn't they could simply flee), is gonna have slaves and concubines. and as civilization continues, more and more men become like this ruler and what you have is more and more men not getting any pussy.
we are in the end days absolutely no doubt about it.
civilization implies that the inequality that it causes are controlled with religious morality being the contract between ruler and ruled. and that people are circumscribed under a territory. nowadays if people dont like a certain area they can just leave. thats not civilization.
we already know a lot about the few hunter gatherers and tribes today in isolated places.
inequality only started to really ratchet up after civilization and we are at the end point right now imo. its simply not sustainable today where foids are only going for the roughly top 15 to 30% of men. men that are a combination of tall, good looking, and rich.
early state formation fundamentally implies slavery imo. whether that be through leaders conjuring lies to people about divine right to rule or using military force to circumscribe a population. and of course, a ruler that uses military force to circumscribe his population (because if he didn't they could simply flee), is gonna have slaves and concubines. and as civilization continues, more and more men become like this ruler and what you have is more and more men not getting any pussy.
we are in the end days absolutely no doubt about it.
civilization implies that the inequality that it causes are controlled with religious morality being the contract between ruler and ruled. and that people are circumscribed under a territory. nowadays if people dont like a certain area they can just leave. thats not civilization.
Last edited:
Similar threads
just_a_little_ill
Users who are viewing this thread
