Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious 80/20 is dumbest myth of manosphere

To koniec

To koniec

Nah i'd goon
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 14, 2020
Posts
13,767
It's should be called 15/60/20/5

15 - Incels or genetic ends
60 - ( majority of society ) guys on dry spells, betabuxxers unattractive but NOT completely waste of skin men
20 - somewhat attractive guys in eyes of women
5 - chads, nuff said

Also there will be never be a incel uprising for sure, or beta revolution lol, cause we are minority of society who often dies early or ropes. Beta uprising is another dangerous cope made by manosphere.

Also less talked aspect of that many don't talk here about is that modern women are often a dykes or at least ''onry pretty boy'' type of toilet. So while it worses situation of many men it doesn't matter for us cause incels are tiny minority


@thespanishcel
@SocialzERo
@solblue
@tulasdanslos
@Lebensmüder
@Cowcel
@SuperKanga.Belgrade
@weaselbomber
@Skelly
@WorthlessSlavicShit
@based_meme
 
20 - somewhat attractive guys in eyes of women
5 - chads, nuff said
so 75/25 rule? I don't think the 80/20 rule means that the full top 20% of men are chads (contains many high earning HTNs) but just that these are the only men women desire and pursue, the rest are leftover betabux deluxe that'll never be their first choice or that they'll never look toward at all (us). basically women aren't heterosexual they're chadsexual (although they may brainwash themselves if a HTN has a sexy wallet).
 
Last edited:
so 75/25 rule? I don't think the 80/20 rule means that the full top 20% of men are chads (contains many high earning HTNs) but just that these are the only men women desire and pursue, the rest are leftover betabux deluxe that'll never be their first choice or that they'll never look toward at all (us). basically women aren't heterosexual they're chadsexual.
not really more like 95/5 rule chads slay, but that 25% percent of guys are stuck in ''limbo'' kinda, if anything HTN's are biggest losers of modern age, cause 30 or 100 years ago they were rather fine, but now they even somewhat struggle
 
if anything HTN's are biggest losers of modern age, cause 30 or 100 years ago they were rather fine, but now they even somewhat struggle
Gon GIFs | Tenor
 
I have one fucked pic of lightning, HOT i must admit
u know what DMs are for :feelsEhh: (if there's full nudity or a man in it u can keep it to urself).
 
You underestimate how bad things really are.
 
if anything HTN's are biggest losers of modern age, cause 30 or 100 years ago they were rather fine, but now they even somewhat struggle
I wouldn't necessarily word it like that. In the end, they have the second highest chance of attracting someone as opposed to the other tiers. HTN's do very well with d8ing in the U.S. Not sure where you live though.
 
I wouldn't necessarily word it like that. In the end, they have the second highest chance of attracting someone as opposed to the other tiers. HTN's do very well with d8ing in the U.S. Not sure where you live though.
I agree with that but what i mean that betabuxxers and incels didn't lost their value unlike this group, in era before feminism HTN's had higher value
 
Cope. The proportion of chads to nonchads is, at the smallest, 1:50. Nonchads can be betabuxxers, that's right, but every nonchad is equally undesirable in the eyes of foids if chads are accessible.
 
20% of men are actually ATTRACTIVE to women. not that 20% of men are in a relationship
 
You underestimate how bad things really are.
Cope. The proportion of chads to nonchads is, at the smallest, 1:50. Nonchads can be betabuxxers, that's right, but every nonchad is equally undesirable in the eyes of foids if chads are accessible.
Exactly, it's more like 99:1 or even 999:1. Make a fake Chad or fake woman dating account if you want to see for yourself.
 
it comes from 80/20 principle which isnt actually based on anything
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top