Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion 60% of the college enrollement is women. thoughts?

mrnobody223

mrnobody223

Greycel
Joined
Sep 29, 2025
Posts
36
Ive read online that more then half the college graduates and people enrolled are mostly women. I find it interesting because it said women are not only refusing to date downwards but are having less options for a desired mate. I find it hilarious and also interesting that the hypergamy applies exponentially that college educated women are not only more picky but are compeeting for a very small margin of chads which creates a hypergamy skewed in favor of chads. Anyone else notice this or have any opinion on the changing college demographics? Not just in favor of chads but the fact that most college graduates are women now. What will the future will be since the majority of college enrollment is women?
 
This is simply the inevitable result of a gynocentric system that favors women every step of the way and offers them incentives to enroll in college; there are scholarships reserved for them, and the education system in general favors women. There has been a conscious societal effort to push women into these spaces and transform them into becoming increasingly hostile toward men. STEM is the only area where men still dominate, and that's often used as further justification for gynocentric policies, worsening the already present gap — and it also fails to acknowledge broader gender-equality issues.
 
Foids only go to college to get pumped and dumped by chads
 
This is simply the inevitable result of a gynocentric system that favors women every step of the way and offers them incentives to enroll in college; there are scholarships reserved for them, and the education system in general favors women. There has been a conscious societal effort to push women into these spaces and transform them into becoming increasingly hostile toward men. STEM is the only area where men still dominate, and that's often used as further justification for gynocentric policies, worsening the already present gap — and it also fails to acknowledge broader gender-equality issues.
To touch on that ive also read that article as well as the hostility towards males in gradeschool by the female teacher bias. Whats your opinion on that? Or the school system being taylor made in the direct benefit of women because of their sub servient nature to authority and the lack of care and overall hostility towards young boys and men at a young age?
 
Foids only go to college to get pumped and dumped by chads
You forgot pipeline to hr department. And the destruction and torture of wage slave normies.
 
I find it interesting because it said women are not only refusing to date downwards but are having less options for a desired mate.
Of course. They center the issue around women as usual; instead of acknowledging the disparity caused by gynocentrism, and the major flaws within the current system and female hypergamy, it is framed as an issue of lack of desirable mates. They are so ridiculously contradictory with their goals and ideas; they claim to be fighting for egalitarianism — which is truly just female supremacy under a guise — yet they also persist with their practice of hypergamy. It's completely nonsensical. You cannot expect your hypergamous demands in these areas to be met if you are actively elevating women, and destroying men, but I suppose they don't care, as they will simply become more hypergamous in other areas.
 
They're the easiest to brain wash
 
To touch on that ive also read that article as well as the hostility towards males in gradeschool by the female teacher bias. Whats your opinion on that? Or the school system being taylor made in the direct benefit of women because of their sub servient nature to authority and the lack of care and overall hostility towards young boys and men at a young age?
The education system is structurally anti-male, whether in how it functions or the bias teachers have against males; there is also a preponderance of female teachers within it, which gives them the perfect opportunity to plant their malicious ideas within youthful minds, and they most certainly exhibit bias against boys (which could even be related to female in-group bias).
 
Of course. They center the issue around women as usual; instead of acknowledging the disparity caused by gynocentrism, and the major flaws within the current system and female hypergamy, it is framed as an issue of lack of desirable mates. They are so ridiculously contradictory with their goals and ideas; they claim to be fighting for egalitarianism — which is truly just female supremacy under a guise — yet they also persist with their practice of hypergamy. It's completely nonsensical. You cannot expect your hypergamous demands in these areas to be met if you are actively elevating women, and destroying men, but I suppose they don't care, as they will simply become more hypergamous in other areas.
My question is what is the consequences of the hypergamy within the next 30 to 50 years? Since the womens movement and its consequences is still relatively new compared to the past. How will it affect the future? Will it ever get to the point of women being forced to bare the reality they created or continue to relish in the glory of being a complete beneficiary of the system? Ironically womens overall satisfaction has gone down while ability to find a physical mate is still extremely high which is hilarious because they know it but refuse to acknowledge it.

With the rise in female college enrollment what will the future be like? With skewed gender roles and males being a majority working in physical labor fields. How will foids ever find their desired partner?

I believe that something in society has to give because i dont believe womens hypergamy can be kept up with the rise of female college enrollment and decline of male enrollment.

At what point will foids have to accept or come to bear with the fact they might be the new age of breadwinners in western society? Will they cope? Will they simply ropemaxx?
How long will they be able to cling to the societal norm of men being the breadwinner when men are no longer making as much as women comparatively? Will they accept their fate or become even more hypergamic to a point where inceldom cannot be ignored and might become largely embraced? Cope or swim?
 
they most certainly exhibit bias against boys (which could even be related to female in-group bias).
Semi off topic but ive learned from hunting deer and observing their patterns that just like humans female deer tend to be group oriented and travel in herds while male deer tend to be nomadic and stick to themselves. Like you said female in-group bias i think could be tied to primal nature and not just human behavior. That women are as predictable as cattle. Sometimes i think animal behaviors are comparative to human behavior if not explainable at least noticeable as well as patternable to explain phenomena.
 
because college degrees don't guarantee a job anymore and normies have to find other ways so yea it's obvious that only retarded foids go college.
 
because college degrees don't guarantee a job anymore and normies have to find other ways so yea it's obvious that only retarded foids go college.
Foids go to college to be impregnated and then collect checks from the absent fathers.
 
This comes as surprising as knowing that most tampon buyers are foid. School is very clearly becoming a female environment.

At what point will foids have to accept or come to bear with the fact they might be the new age of breadwinners in western society?
As schools become a female thing, they also lose relevance. A college degree is not as useful as it was in the past, university is already becoming a joke.
But yes, women are more desired in the workforce too. With technology taking away manual labor, foid abilities like socializing, emotional manipulation, and verbal skills are more requested. And that is without counting all the arbitrary advantages that they also get. Women don't want to be breadwinners but in the 18-30 age range they already are, thrown in a world of opportunities as their male peers remain unsocialized manchildren living with their parents.
And to answer your question, what does this mean for hypergamy? For the top-looking men nothing changes. For the normies who were fighting for their crumbs, things are getting worse. The fate of one in ten of them seems to be to remain locked in his room unaccepted both by women and jobs forever, in other words, to become an incel like us.
 
Will they accept their fate or become even more hypergamic to a point where inceldom cannot be ignored and might become largely embraced?
We have no way of knowing what technology will be like in 40 years, and how men and foids may use it to cope without looking for a partner. But inceldom is unlikely to become largely embraced due to society's deeply entrenched dislike of single men. There might be more incel-related topics to go viral, perhaps even leading to a brief period when inceldom will be viewed as "fashionable", in which case it will then be distorted by the normies and corporations attracted to it and lose its significance
 
My question is what is the consequences of the hypergamy within the next 30 to 50 years? Since the womens movement and its consequences is still relatively new compared to the past. How will it affect the future? Will it ever get to the point of women being forced to bare the reality they created or continue to relish in the glory of being a complete beneficiary of the system? Ironically womens overall satisfaction has gone down while ability to find a physical mate is still extremely high which is hilarious because they know it but refuse to acknowledge it.

With the rise in female college enrollment what will the future be like? With skewed gender roles and males being a majority working in physical labor fields. How will foids ever find their desired partner?

I believe that something in society has to give because i dont believe womens hypergamy can be kept up with the rise of female college enrollment and decline of male enrollment.

At what point will foids have to accept or come to bear with the fact they might be the new age of breadwinners in western society? Will they cope? Will they simply ropemaxx?
How long will they be able to cling to the societal norm of men being the breadwinner when men are no longer making as much as women comparatively? Will they accept their fate or become even more hypergamic to a point where inceldom cannot be ignored and might become largely embraced? Cope or swim?
I think that hypergamy will continue to worsen until a drastic shift occurs, or perhaps a gradual one does, since secular ideologies and feminist adjacent ones are self-destructive, thus will inevitably die out and get replaced by something which is actually sustainable. Technology could also play a role here, however, so it's quite difficult to predict the future definitively.
 
Semi off topic but ive learned from hunting deer and observing their patterns that just like humans female deer tend to be group oriented and travel in herds while male deer tend to be nomadic and stick to themselves. Like you said female in-group bias i think could be tied to primal nature and not just human behavior. That women are as predictable as cattle. Sometimes i think animal behaviors are comparative to human behavior if not explainable at least noticeable as well as patternable to explain phenomena.
There could definitely be some truth to that.
 
This is one of the biggest shifts in society that is underrated. Foids of this generation are dominating education at bigger rates than boomer foids and this lead to feminist HR cunts.
 
Thinking Ape made a video about this on Rumble not too long ago.
 
woman are just smarter than men and have better work ethic :soy::soy:
 
STEM is the only area where men still dominate, and that's often used as further justification for gynocentric policies, worsening the already present gap — and it also fails to acknowledge broader gender-equality issues.
Not to mention how easy it is for a women to find a tech role compared to a man with the same experience.
 
In both monkey and human studies, when a group is female dominated, the women give it up easier in hopes of enticing the men (rare) to form a relationship, while in male dominated groups, the men form steady relationships easier in hopes of scoring pussy (rare). Of course, the female strategy doesn't end up working out, as the successful men just enjoy the easy pussy and move on. As colleges skew more female, hookup culture will get worse and worse. And the baseline is already bad since so many men are invisible to women, psychologically the women feel like men are super scarce.
 
They end up doing bullshit degrees
 
Surprised it isn't even higher at this point.
Going to college as an average male in 2025 is just a humiliation ritual.
 
Last edited:
This is simply the inevitable result of a gynocentric system that favors women every step of the way and offers them incentives to enroll in college
seriously the only way, DEI students.
 
Semi off topic but ive learned from hunting deer and observing their patterns that just like humans female deer tend to be group oriented and travel in herds while male deer tend to be nomadic and stick to themselves. Like you said female in-group bias i think could be tied to primal nature and not just human behavior. That women are as predictable as cattle. Sometimes i think animal behaviors are comparative to human behavior if not explainable at least noticeable as well as patternable to explain phenomena.
Humans are animals for sure
 
HR cunts.
It's not a coincidence that the most inhuman and insensitive toilets I've seen in my life are holding HR positions.

Putrid systematic evil in the form of walking meat.
 
Most white collar jobs are becoming obsolete, so it hardly doesn't matter anymore.

I have a STEM degree, and it's basically worthless as well.
 

Similar threads

Yunoo
Replies
8
Views
646
Yunoo
Yunoo
reight..
Replies
5
Views
431
Peroz Shapur
Peroz Shapur
senegambianbro
Replies
9
Views
1K
yakusai
yakusai
earming
Replies
33
Views
3K
cathuluelitist
cathuluelitist

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top