Blackpill (2025 Argentinian study) Odds of sexual coercion/violence perpetration by gender and sexuality

[The Notorious SLAV]

No significant differences were found between the two male groups, the two female groups, or between sexual minority men and women (Figure 1).

Filling the Gaps: Sexual Violence Perpetration Among Underrepresented Groups in Argentina - Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Introduction Sexual violence (SV) remains a significant public health concern, with complex manifestations across gender and sexual orientation. In Argentina, research on SV perpetration is scarce and has focused almost exclusively on heterosexual men, leaving a critical gap in data on other...

link.springer.com

Unsurprising. Once again, the statistically significant differences are only significant in a purely mathematical sense, not in the way a person on the street would consider "significant". With heterosexual men being about 2.4 times as likely to perpetrate sexual violence as their female counterparts, the difference between them isn't even 5:2. And sure, the male perpetration was more intense, but the questionnaire they used there is specifically built with male perpetrators and female victims in mind, which the researchers acknowledge in the study itself and which is probably skewing the results.

The findings are notable considering that the SES has been criticized for not inquiring about certain behaviors presumed to be more prevalent among heterosexual women and sexual minorities, for example, forcing another person to use parts of their body or an object to penetrate a victim (Anderson et al., 2020). Probably, without a heterosexist bias, a higher prevalence of SV perpetrated by groups other than heterosexual men would be expected, something not found in this study.

And even then, when they did a linear regression analysis taking the severity and amount of acts into account, the hetero men/women difference had increased only a to a whopping 3:1.

And of course, all of that is not taking into account that there weren't much differences between homosexuals of both genders, which, just like the studies showing lesbians to have the highest domestic violence rates, by itself just shows that, yeah, foids' claims of being better than men is pure bullshit.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Bump.

 

[Justnormalincel]

foids' claims of being better than men is pure bullshit.

foids are always the problem since the dawn of time. I just followed ya since you are the only one to post research and evidences here.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

foids are always the problem since the dawn of time. I just followed ya since you are the only one to post research and evidences here.

Thanks.

 

[GeckoBus]

bump

 

[| |]

not in the way a person on the street would consider "significant". With heterosexual men being about 2.4 times as likely to perpetrate sexual violence as their female counterparts,

no, this is definitely statistically significant. saying otherwise is cope. I don't understand why you want to cope about this anyways, it's obvious that men are more overtly violent and likely to force sex due to their reproductive nature. that's a 70%:30% ratio. if this was anything painting foids in a bad light instead you'd probably be jumping at the fact that it's statistically significant.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

no, this is definitely statistically significant. saying otherwise is cope.

I'm not saying it isn't, I'm just saying that what is statistically significant in studies like this and what a layperson on the street would imagine when hearing that but not knowing the numbers are wildly different. If you just showed some person on the street the abstract and asked them to guess this specific ratio, how many of them would guess it or anything close to it?

I don't understand why you want to cope about this anyways,

Not coping, just sharing stuff that I believe should be much more widely known, since we live in a world where most people find it impossible to believe that an adult woman could force an adult man into sex, or if they do believe that, they likely believe it to be much less frequent than it seems to be in studies like this. If anything, it's blackpilling to see how sexually aggressive women are and can be, they just aren't with you.

it's obvious that men are more overtly violent and likely to force sex due to their reproductive nature.

I'm not denying that, I just like to point out the caveats there. Such as, as in this study, there being smaller differences between gays and lesbians than among the two heterosexual group, pretty clearly showing that at least a part of the difference is solely due to the physical differences and not due to any innate willingness to be sexually coercive. Or, as shows up in different studies and surveys, while 60-70% of sexual violence might be male-perpetrated, the majority of people victimizing men are women, and it very much isn't "men doing it" to both genders, as is sometimes claimed to deflect from women's actions.

that's a 70%:30% ratio.

Yes.

if this was anything painting foids in a bad light instead you'd probably be jumping at the fact that it's statistically significant.

Maybe, but if it seemed like I'm trying to sell the numbers as being higher than they actually are, then anyone would be free to cut that down and correct me.

 

[| |]

If you just showed some person on the street the abstract and asked them to guess this specific ratio, how many of them would guess it or anything close to it?

just sharing stuff that I believe should be much more widely known, since we live in a world where most people find it impossible to believe that an adult woman could force an adult man into sex, or if they do believe that, they likely believe it to be much less frequent than it seems to be in studies like this.

Fair.