Blackpill 2013 review with a decent amount of pre-2000 sources on female sexual victimization of males

[The Notorious SLAV]

Interesting. Most of these studies I guess have little value now decades later, but they are still quite valuable at showing just how quickly those results were found after being searched for and just how big some of these numbers were.

https://kar.kent.ac.uk/33378/3/Fisher%20%2526%20Pina%20REVISED%20FV%20AVB%2010-05R.pdf

 

[autisticsoy]

Im pretty stupid could you summarized this for me what the papers say?

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Im pretty stupid could you summarized this for me what the papers say?

Sure, but I'm not sure how summarizable this is since I made sure to screenshot mostly the parts with numbers and percentages there. Basically, while to this day a lot of people don't think it's even possible for adult men to be sexually victimized by women and to be forced into sex by them, this review found multiple very early sources on the numbers of this going all the way back to early 80s, which is apparently where we can find the earliest usable data like this.

Some of these studies seem to be highballing those numbers by including anything even slightly sexual like kissing or touching, similarly to how a lot of feminist researchers inflate the numbers in their anti-male studies, ending with stuff like 20%+ of men reporting both physical and verbal aggression to force them into something sexual, but even after looking solely at people claiming to have been forced into full sex, those 80s' studies still give us numbers in the 1.5-6.5% range for being subjected to physical violence in that way according to the guys who it had supposedly happened to and 1.2-8.9% according to the women who have supposedly done so, with the other tactics generally having even higher percentages.