Blackpill Proportion of female-headed households by country, most recent available data since the year 2000

[The Notorious SLAV]

Brutal Slavpill. "Bro, Slavs are so based, they keep women on a leash, there's no feminism there!" yeah, sure.

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Remember though, this is just based on who is the "reference person" for the household, it's not about who is actually the dominant person there. A much better way to measure this would be asking in the multi-person households who makes the most decisions there, but I'll take whatever I can get there, and there's probably not too much difference between those two things.

153 countries are depicted on the map and levels of female headship range from 1.7 percent in Afghanistan to 70.6 percent in Latvia. The highest levels are in Europe, the Americas, and the southern part of Africa.

Over 70% of households in Latvia are female-headed based on the definition (reference person on the documents) used in this paper.

The trends depicted unequivocally show that female headship is growing worldwide. However, there is substantial heterogeneity, and the gender gap remains far from closing, as 142 countries have not reached the 50 percent threshold at any point in time.

Interesting.

Panel b plots the prevalence of single-person and single-mother families among female-headed households for the most recent data per country from 2000 against the overall proportions of female-headed households (y-axis). The diversity of experiences is apparent, ranging from 99.8 percent of female-headed households in the Czech Republic composed of these two groups to 19.7 percent in Guinea-Bissau.

The highest concentrations of single-person and single-mother units among female heads are found in Europe (e.g., 93.6 percent in the United Kingdom and 89.2 percent in Hungary) and Asia (e.g., 90.8 percent in Iran, 83.5 percent in Syria, and 78.4 percent in South Korea). Contrarily, the lowest levels are scattered across all regions (e.g., 21.1 percent in Samoa, 23.9 percent in Comoros, 25.7 percent in Paraguay, and 26.7 percent in Slovenia).

Interesting that, when looked closer at what those female-headed households actually are and how many are just single mothers and women living alone, a) You'll find Slavic countries at both ends of the spectrum, and b) The ones where it most often isn't just foids living alone or as single mothers and it's actually them being the reference persons for larger family groups, that seems to be much less geographically focused, with what genuinely seems like a random mix of countries across the world leading it.

Makes me wonder what the latter means. Could it be that "female oppression" is even more of a myth than most of us think (like 99.9% instead of 99%)? Does it show how much "global patriarchy" is just a meaningless and imaginary concept created by feminists to excuse women's failures and mediocrity and to demonize men, by showing the wide variety of cultures where you can see women being officially named as heads of multi-adult households?

I'm just asking questions here.

 

[endoftheskies]

Brutal Slavpill. "Bro, Slavs are so based, they keep women on a leash, there's no feminism there!" yeah, sure.

View attachment 1577657

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Remember though, this is just based on who is the "reference person" for the household, it's not about who is actually the dominant person there. A much better way to measure this would be asking in the multi-person households who makes the most decisions there, but I'll take whatever I can get there, and there's probably not too much difference between those two things.


Over 70% of households in Latvia are female-headed based on the definition (reference person on the documents) used in this paper.



View attachment 1577658

Interesting.



Interesting that, when looked closer at what those female-headed households actually are and how many are just single mothers and women living alone, a) You'll find Slavic countries at both ends of the spectrum, and b) The ones where it most often isn't just foids living alone or as single mothers and it's actually them being the reference persons for larger family groups, that seems to be much less geographically focused, with what genuinely seems like a random mix of countries across the world leading it.

Makes me wonder what the latter means. Could it be that "female oppression" is even more of a myth than most of us think (like 99.9% instead of 99%)? Does it show how much "global patriarchy" is just a meaningless and imaginary concept created by feminists to excuse women's failures and mediocrity and to demonize men, by showing the wide variety of cultures where you can see women being officially named as heads of multi-adult households?

View attachment 1577719

I'm just asking questions here.

using blue for low female-headed households, and red for high amounts of female headed households was really appropiate.

 

[Sperg Abomination]

using blue for low female-headed households, and red for high amounts of female headed households was really appropiate.

BOMB THE ZONES IN RED PLS

 

[endoftheskies]

BOMB THE ZONES IN RED PLS

yea

 

[endoftheskies]

Brutal Slavpill. "Bro, Slavs are so based, they keep women on a leash, there's no feminism there!" yeah, sure.

View attachment 1577657

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Remember though, this is just based on who is the "reference person" for the household, it's not about who is actually the dominant person there. A much better way to measure this would be asking in the multi-person households who makes the most decisions there, but I'll take whatever I can get there, and there's probably not too much difference between those two things.


Over 70% of households in Latvia are female-headed based on the definition (reference person on the documents) used in this paper.



View attachment 1577658

Interesting.



Interesting that, when looked closer at what those female-headed households actually are and how many are just single mothers and women living alone, a) You'll find Slavic countries at both ends of the spectrum, and b) The ones where it most often isn't just foids living alone or as single mothers and it's actually them being the reference persons for larger family groups, that seems to be much less geographically focused, with what genuinely seems like a random mix of countries across the world leading it.

Makes me wonder what the latter means. Could it be that "female oppression" is even more of a myth than most of us think (like 99.9% instead of 99%)? Does it show how much "global patriarchy" is just a meaningless and imaginary concept created by feminists to excuse women's failures and mediocrity and to demonize men, by showing the wide variety of cultures where you can see women being officially named as heads of multi-adult households?

View attachment 1577719

I'm just asking questions here.

single-mothers in abundance + those oofy-doofy betabuxx deluxe normies.

 

[das]

war must play a role in this statistics, when father participate war mother become the head of home . Maybe thats why russia and Ukraine is red , but idk about others

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

war must play a role in this statistics, when father participate war mother become the head of home . Maybe thats why russia and Ukraine is red , but idk about others

It actually seems like neither Russia or Ukraine had data sources from after 2020 used in the study.

Also, the study's definition of a household head is rather inflexible as I mentioned in the OP, and the way it was defined it could both understate and overstate the numbers for a given country. Though I would say that EE is just a rather feminist region in general, and that's why those countries are in red.

 

[GeckoBus]

Brutal Slavpill. "Bro, Slavs are so based, they keep women on a leash, there's no feminism there!" yeah, sure.

View attachment 1577657

Error - Cookies Turned Off

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Remember though, this is just based on who is the "reference person" for the household, it's not about who is actually the dominant person there. A much better way to measure this would be asking in the multi-person households who makes the most decisions there, but I'll take whatever I can get there, and there's probably not too much difference between those two things.


Over 70% of households in Latvia are female-headed based on the definition (reference person on the documents) used in this paper.



View attachment 1577658

Interesting.



Interesting that, when looked closer at what those female-headed households actually are and how many are just single mothers and women living alone, a) You'll find Slavic countries at both ends of the spectrum, and b) The ones where it most often isn't just foids living alone or as single mothers and it's actually them being the reference persons for larger family groups, that seems to be much less geographically focused, with what genuinely seems like a random mix of countries across the world leading it.

Makes me wonder what the latter means. Could it be that "female oppression" is even more of a myth than most of us think (like 99.9% instead of 99%)? Does it show how much "global patriarchy" is just a meaningless and imaginary concept created by feminists to excuse women's failures and mediocrity and to demonize men, by showing the wide variety of cultures where you can see women being officially named as heads of multi-adult households?

View attachment 1577719

I'm just asking questions here.

The Unsustainability of our System: The Feminist-Capitalist Ouroboros (Part 1)

A brief introduction of a very complex issue

ashieldformenmra.substack.com

moxton link he referenced:

Spoiler: link

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330467347_Human_Pair-Bonding_as_a_Service_to_the_Female_short_title_Human_Pair-Bonding_as_a_Service_to_Women_in_Excluding_Men_of_Lower_but_Not_Higher_Mate-Value_and_a_Buffer_Against_Female_Age-Related_Mate-Valu/link/5c417d80458515a4c72e4b41/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19

Now about the paper itself that moxton referenced. At first I thought he fucked up when he claimed that women control 90% of the decisions, idk you tell me, you are better at decyphering these papers. I attached pdf for the 1986 paper below. Could he have meant this part:

The data in Table 2 show that only 22% of the male-dominant couples have high
consensus in respect to who should have the final say, compared to 48% of the
couples in equalitarian relationships. Thus, as might be expected on the basis of the
long-term decline of patriarchal authority, relatively few male-dominant couples
exist by consensus between the partners. The low consensus concerning the distribu-
tion of power is probably part of the reason for the high conflict over issues such as
household chores, social activities, and money, as shown in the previous section. It
probably also helps explain the high level of violence in male-dominant relation-
ships found by previous studies (Straus, 1973; Straus, Gelles, & Steinmetz, 1980).

So here is how I read this: They divided the couples they surveyed into male-dominated, female dominated and equality based decision making, split decision making, four groups. Out of the male dominated couples, only 22% of the men were basically not being henpicked and their wifes were constantly nagging them - which could imply they were not actually male-dominated, right? (I think I am wrong, I need you to read it for me habibi)

Going back to the substack post:

Men show stronger aversion to economic inequality than women when mating is at stake, study finds

In a series of studies, men showed stronger aversion than women to high inequality when thinking about finding a life partner. The results suggest that inequality shapes mating prospects differently for each sex.

www.psypost.org

Water wet, women can not loose. There is no scenario, outside of being literally tortured to death or bombed from orbit directly, where women will not remain superior to men. And even when being bombed, the civilian casualty rate is like 70% men, as if the bombs refuse to hit women, it's actually insane.

also funny article to finish reply:

Four in 10 deaths in war zones last year were women, UN report finds

UN Women says figure doubled in 2023 amid ‘blatant disregard’ of laws that left women and children unprotected

www.theguardian.com

kekfuel title

---

EDIT:
was trying to find more confirmation for moxons claim, found this:

The answer, of course, is that feminists still view males as having power, whereas,
Coleman and Straus (1986) showed male dominant couples were only 9.4% of U.S.

Among the data sets cited by Dutton in 1994 as contradictory to the feminist view were
the following:
(1) unidirectional bsevereQ female intimate violence was more common than
male unidirectional intimate violence (Stets & Straus, 1992b);

(2) lesbian abuse rates were
higher than heterosexual male–female abuse rates (Lie, Schilit, Bush, Montague, & Reyes,
1991);

(3) only a small percentage of males were violent over the life course of a marriage
(Straus et al., 1980);

(4) as many females as males were violent (Straus et al., 1980);

(5)D.G. Dutton, T.L. Nicholls / Aggression and Violent Behavior 10 (2005) 680–714 683
very few males approved of the spouse abuse (Stark & McEvoy, 1970)1 ;

(6) only 9.6% of males were dominant in their marriage (Coleman & Straus, 1986); and,

(7) male violence was not linearly related to cultural indicators of patriarchy across US states (Yllo & Straus, 1990).
Each of these data sets, available by 1993, has routinely been ignored by the feminist
paradigm.

source for PDF:

Spoiler: source

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223859544_The_gender_paradigm_in_domestic_violence_research_and_theory_Part_1-The_conflict_of_theory_and_data

So we have multiple researchers, even university ones, which moxton is not, citing and making the same claim. I assume that @The Notorious SLAV will be able to identify the actual numbers used as source here, I am too retarded to find it in the original 1986 paper, which is attached below.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Now about the paper itself that moxton referenced. At first I thought he fucked up when he claimed that women control 90% of the decisions, idk you tell me, you are better at decyphering these papers. I attached pdf for the 1986 paper below. Could he have meant this part:

So here is how I read this: They divided the couples they surveyed into male-dominated, female dominated and equality based decision making, split decision making, four groups. Out of the male dominated couples, only 22% of the men were basically not being henpicked and their wifes were constantly nagging them - which could imply they were not actually male-dominated, right? (I think I am wrong, I need you to read it for me habibi)

I think you got it right, Moxon seems to have worded it wrong. A better way to say it would be something like "less than 10% of couples were fully male-dominated" or something like that.