Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious 10 Ideas blackpillers and radical feminists agree on

>See wall of text
>Dnr, just say you agreed with it because wall of text
>Randomly pick a few points which seem connected to your pet issues to talk about
>Months later, OP is banned because bluepill
>Nobody even calls you out or notices you, because your post is on the second page
>?????
>Profit
i saw your response to him yesterday and i was thinking about replying to you but i thought “i don’t want to enter a 10 page argument about shit that’s common sense” :feelskek:
 
also i want to point out how retarded this whole “chad has the best genetics so he deserves to procreate!” statement is. How do we know he has good genetics? just because he’s good looking? Looks do absolutely nothing for survival in the wild or benefit evolution in any way. For all we know, the chad that supposedly has good genetics is a retard with poor impulse control, no emotional intelligence and has low muscle mass and stamina. Objectively, a guy that’s much uglier but is the complete opposite of that chad is more fit to survive in the wild and to progress evolution and therefore his genetics are better.
 
i saw your response to him yesterday and i was thinking about replying to you but i thought “i don’t want to enter a 10 page argument about shit that’s common sense” :feelskek:
I see;):yes::feelzez:.

also i want to point out how retarded this whole “chad has the best genetics so he deserves to procreate!” statement is. How do we know he has good genetics? just because he’s good looking? Looks do absolutely nothing for survival in the wild or benefit evolution in any way. For all we know, the chad that supposedly has good genetics is a retard with poor impulse control, no emotional intelligence and has low muscle mass and stamina. Objectively, a guy that’s much uglier but is the complete opposite of that chad is more fit to survive in the wild and to progress evolution and therefore his genetics are better.
Exactly. "Chad looks good, therefore he's got good genetics," is just textbook lookism. Just because someone looks good doesn't mean everything about them is good.
 

Similar threads

AsakangaHalo
Replies
12
Views
191
anandkonda
anandkonda
JustanotherKanga
Replies
34
Views
596
suicidecase
suicidecase
SlayerSlayer
Replies
15
Views
611
Anthrofurrcel
Anthrofurrcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top