Blackpill 10/10 stacies will become extinct

[Robo Sapien]

This is a weird theory, but hear me out on this one. In our current sexual market place, hypergamy is at an all time high. We have 6 women dating and marrying 10 guys. We have 10 women basically hopping from guy to guy. Water is wet, I know. BUT, my theory is that 10/10 stacies will price themselves out of the market. Hypergamy will raise the price of pussy so high that no guy will be willing to go for a 10/10. Largely because it isn't realistic to keep them without restricting their sexuality. Thus, if her sexuality is unrestricted, she will chronically go from guy to guy until she ages out. When she attempts to settle down with her 10/10 counterparts, they would've largely moved on to marrying an average women with less miles. I know, few women have "less" miles. However, the main point is that this process will take place for generations until hot 10/10 babes get mated out of existence. Your thoughts guys?

 

[mylifeistrash]

sounds about right

women are getting uglier while men are getting taller and better looking

 

[P-Chan]

Bullshit.
9/10 Womand would still bang with 10/10 Man the Children can be now 8-10/10.

 

[idkwattodowithlife]

sounds right in theory. i thought in PSL communities they taut that 10/10's don't exist or that there's no 10/10 (because once you get into to upper scales, looks become a little more subjective). my thought of a 10/10 may not be the 10/10, you envision.

 

[Robo Sapien]

Bullshit.
9/10 Womand would still bang with 10/10 Man the Children can be now 8-10/10.

The theory is that no woman 8/10 or above can be restricted sexually. In the current paradigm, it's impossible. If a 6/10 woman can get a 10/10 man, then what reason should an 8/10 woman settle for a 10/10 man? She has no incentive other than personal ones. Those kinds of women are only loyal when their options are restricted.In the current environment 8/10 and above aren't restricted.

 

[Cakwak]

This is a weird theory, but hear me out on this one. In our current sexual market place, hypergamy is at an all time high. We have 6 women dating and marrying 10 guys. We have 10 women basically hopping from guy to guy. Water is wet, I know. BUT, my theory is that 10/10 stacies will price themselves out of the market. Hypergamy will raise the price of pussy so high that no guy will be willing to go for a 10/10. Largely because it isn't realistic to keep them without restricting their sexuality. Thus, if her sexuality is unrestricted, she will chronically go from guy to guy until she ages out. When she attempts to settle down with her 10/10 counterparts, they would've largely moved on to marrying an average women with less miles. I know, few women have "less" miles. However, the main point is that this process will take place for generations until hot 10/10 babes get mated out of existence. Your thoughts guys?

I agree with all of this but the water.
Water is not wet

 

[SUH]

High IQ, at least for qt low T(especially white) women. Women preffering low inhib chads will result in their female offspring being high T and being thicc, huge saggy milk tits, hairy and with robust skulls. That means there will be fewer and fewer girls that fit the "cute" body type(small jawline, thin,small perky tits).

Since white women almost exclusively prefer high T guys, there will be no cute white women anymore. Low T white guys will die out or assimilate into the SEA race, so there will still be some low T asian girls out there.

 

[Deleted member 1252]

Very possible, actually. This is logically the biological result of female hypergamy. Female looks will deteriorate whilst male looks will improve.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

I can see that happening

High IQ, at least for qt low T(especially white) women. Women preffering low inhib chads will result in their female offspring being high T and being thicc, huge saggy milk tits, hairy and with robust skulls. That means there will be fewer and fewer girls that fit the "cute" body type(small jawline, thin,small perky tits).

Since white women almost exclusively prefer high T guys, there will be no cute white women anymore. Low T white guys will die out or assimilate into the SEA race, so there will still be some low T asian girls out there.

oh yeah this too. The overabundance of high T mates will make women higher T, thus less attractive.

 

[KingChemist]

Makes sense yea. That us unless 10/10's use their brain and go for a smarter, more reliable and loyal guys that are say 7 or 8. But we all know that's no happening lmao.

 

[SUH]

I can see that happening

oh yeah this too. The overabundance of high T mates will make women higher T, thus less attractive.

It will be over for whitecels who like cute white women.

 

[Robo Sapien]

sounds right in theory. i thought in PSL communities they taut that 10/10's don't exist or that there's no 10/10 (because once you get into to upper scales, looks become a little more subjective). my thought of a 10/10 may not be the 10/10, you envision.

I think the difference between say an 8/10 and a 10/10 is that the 10/10 is striking. They are like painted masterpieces that you just can't help but to look at, or like opening up a pack of pokemon cards and finding a holographic Charizard inside. You're simply in amazement. There's that wow factor that most guys would agree on.

 

[Zaetheus]

No such thing as a 10/10 perfect human beings don’t exist.

 

[Robo Sapien]

No such thing as a 10/10 perfect human beings don’t exist.

Would beg to differ, but let's say for the sake of argument that you're right. My point still stands that 6/10 women are still getting into LTR's with 9/10 men. For the sake of argument I'll call this the 3+ argument, that a woman can easily secure a man 3 points above her for a long-term relationship. That means that 7/10's will be able to hook up with this mythical 10/10 guy. That means that all women 8/10 and above will not be able to find partners, because no one mogs them by 3 points. That's my theory.

 

[Zaetheus]

Beauty is subjective, based on who you ask , you will get different answers. There may be people who you think is very very attractive , but everyone has flaws.This goes beyond looks wise of course.Of course women can date way above their league , we know that.Guys who are 7-9/10 date lower , the same way guys 1-6/10 date unattractive women because they think they have a better chance. Attractive men date lower because it’s easier , and guaranteed to LTR . “10/10” women you speak of will have to settle for a less desirable partner. Example is that no one on this forum can rate for shit, some here call a femoid that’s 2/10 to me , but 7/10 to them. It’s one of those things that getting straight answers are impossible. 7/10 women are above will have to settle even if no one mogs them , not in their prime of course , but when they get older and lonely. That’s when betabux comes in .

Would beg to differ, but let's say for the sake of argument that you're right. My point still stands that 6/10 women are still getting into LTR's with 9/10 men. For the sake of argument I'll call this the 3+ argument, that a woman can easily secure a man 3 points above her for a long-term relationship. That means that 7/10's will be able to hook up with this mythical 10/10 guy. That means that all women 8/10 and above will not be able to find partners, because no one mogs them by 3 points. That's my theory.

 

[Deleted member 7448]

Nah, there's always a hierarchy. When the standards are lowered, some will still try to rise above. 16-24 is their prime, and there'll be plenty of 10/10 women in that age gap, there's far too many advantages to being a 10/10 for women to give them up.

 

[Deleted member 11015]

Extremely high stacys always have higher IQ and come from a good family at least where I live. They are not really slutty, and they settle down early with a man of high class/status. This man is sometimes is lower on the looks scale than her. Instagram stacys are always from low IQ families and she got lucky with looks.

 

[pichon]

In my classroom there was a female(we are friends)who is gros but have a very cut face and I think to me "it's the first gross person I see that I think is beautiful"

 

[Sodoku]

Cope. Water is not wet.

 

[FiveFourManlet]

They will never be extinct, its down to probability, although they are rare, statistically they will always be a 10/10 running around somewhere.

Its impossible for people to get uglier on average, people will always get better looking over time.

 

[Robo Sapien]

Beauty is subjective, based on who you ask , you will get different answers. There may be people who you think is very very attractive , but everyone has flaws.This goes beyond looks wise of course.Of course women can date way above their league , we know that.Guys who are 7-9/10 date lower , the same way guys 1-6/10 date unattractive women because they think they have a better chance. Attractive men date lower because it’s easier , and guaranteed to LTR . “10/10” women you speak of will have to settle for a less desirable partner. Example is that no one on this forum can rate for shit, some here call a femoid that’s 2/10 to me , but 7/10 to them. It’s one of those things that getting straight answers are impossible. 7/10 women are above will have to settle even if no one mogs them , not in their prime of course , but when they get older and lonely. That’s when betabux comes in .

Enough with the looks are subjective meme. Looks are not subjective. There are factors that can be decided upon. The reason why looks become "subjective" is because men have learned to settle for what they perceive they could get. They form fetishes with the women who represent the highest amount of success to them. This is really where the divide comes from. That being said, we can agree that 8/10 women and above under no obligation to commit, and there aren't any men who mog them enough for them to become obedient and compliant. Most of these women will fuck and take birth control until they age out. At that point they will start families when it's far too late.

They will never be extinct, its down to probability, although they are rare, statistically they will always be a 10/10 running around somewhere.

Its impossible for people to get uglier on average, people will always get better looking over time.

Men will get better looking over time. The same can't be said of women.

 

[landocalarisian]

WOW thats a real MGTOW theory tho

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

10s have a tendency to not breed even in marriages, so it's over for them

 

[Robo Sapien]

This is the future boyos

 

[Robo Sapien]

bump

 

[Gigacel]

Here’s another theory of mine. “There is no such thing as a 10/10 Stacey”. This is because there were never any competition within the female gender EVER for anything including looks. The looks gene is really a male achievement due to weaker males dying during combat. Females back in the day selected for the strongest males as it was the alpha who mates with all the females. This meant that males fucked a bunch of random slags while the slags fucked CHAD. This means that the boundary of looks is advanced by MEN and not women.

This comes back to the statement as to why there’s no 10/10 Stacey’s. The reason is that a 10/10 male has no true looksmatch. This is a play on hypergamy and that women will always pick someone higher than her and if that’s the case then the standards of looks gets increased. Therefore the new standards has no looksmatch

 

[TysonxTyson]

Once Sex Robots, Artificial womb, nanny/maid bots, and VR (main stream) hits the market, pussy price will be cheaper than dirt. Couple that with automation of basic jobs (mostly occupied by women) and it's game over for them. Men will get hit by Automation too but, not all jobs will go away. Craftsmanship will be valued since, it's takes time and repetition to reach master status (natural process). Men also dominate Crypto, which is the future of finance. Broads are too busy with social media and celebrity gossip to see the changes are taking place.
[QUOTE=". The reason is that a 10/10 male has no true looksmatch. This is a play on hypergamy and that women will always pick someone higher than her and if that’s the case then the standards of looks gets increased. Therefore the new standards has no looksmatch[/QUOTE]
That makes sense to me.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

This theory is untrue because it 1. Fails to realize that 10/10s can never go extinct, because your SMV is relative to other people, if all 10/10s were to just disappear now, then the 9,7+/10's would become the 10/10s, because they would be the top tier then, due to the extinction of 10/10s. 2. assumes that your SMV is entirely genetic, which is simply not true.

Here’s another theory of mine. “There is no such thing as a 10/10 Stacey”. This is because there were never any competition within the female gender EVER for anything including looks. The looks gene is really a male achievement due to weaker males dying during combat. Females back in the day selected for the strongest males as it was the alpha who mates with all the females. This meant that males fucked a bunch of random slags while the slags fucked CHAD. This means that the boundary of looks is advanced by MEN and not women.

This comes back to the statement as to why there’s no 10/10 Stacey’s. The reason is that a 10/10 male has no true looksmatch. This is a play on hypergamy and that women will always pick someone higher than her and if that’s the case then the standards of looks gets increased. Therefore the new standards has no looksmatch

X/10 is not achieved through competition, it's simply an observant rating on your SMV (aka your looks), used to categorize people, so that their attractiveness level can better be conveyed to other people, as well as understood by yourself.

 

[Robo Sapien]

Here’s another theory of mine. “There is no such thing as a 10/10 Stacey”. This is because there were never any competition within the female gender EVER for anything including looks. The looks gene is really a male achievement due to weaker males dying during combat. Females back in the day selected for the strongest males as it was the alpha who mates with all the females. This meant that males fucked a bunch of random slags while the slags fucked CHAD. This means that the boundary of looks is advanced by MEN and not women.

This comes back to the statement as to why there’s no 10/10 Stacey’s. The reason is that a 10/10 male has no true looksmatch. This is a play on hypergamy and that women will always pick someone higher than her and if that’s the case then the standards of looks gets increased. Therefore the new standards has no looksmatch

This theory is untrue because it 1. Fails to realize that 10/10s can never go extinct, because your SMV is relative to other people, if all 10/10s were to just disappear now, then the 9,7+/10's would become the 10/10s, because they would be the top tier then, due to the extinction of 10/10s. 2. assumes that your SMV is entirely genetic, which is simply not true.

X/10 is not achieved through competition, it's simply an observant rating on your SMV (aka your looks), used to categorize people, so that their attractiveness level can better be conveyed to other people, as well as understood by yourself.

Alright, let's forget the whole 10/10 piece for a bit. If we objectively have an 8/10 with no make up in front of us, is she not going to have so many options that she won't settle down? Attractive women will not be able to find men who mog them. They won't be able to settle down because the men who mog them don't exist, or they're gods on another planet.