Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Will ectomorphic, small framed people become extinct since the trait only benefits women?

9

933127

Greycel
Joined
Apr 24, 2025
Posts
19
Online time
3m 6s
Skinny ectomorph men are largely undesirable. They are viewed as weak, effeminate to most women. Which means many of them will not procreate.

This trait however is favorable on women. If underweight, they can gain some weight and still remain gracefully slim. If they become skinny fat, a little cardio is all that is needed to tone up. Naturally slim women age like fine wine. After marriage and childbirth they do not get fat like their counterparts (medium and large framed women). As they get older and metabolism slows, they will gain some weight on their hips and can have lovely curves that were once unattainable in their youth. Perfect example would be celebrities like Elizabeth Hurley.

Since most women aren’t attracted to skinny men, this reduces the frequency of the ectomorph gene being passed on. Large majority of the burden rests on the slim ectomorph women to pass on this trait to their potential daughters.

As obesity rate rises in developed countries and the undesirability of thin men, will this genetic trait eventually go extinct?
 
This picture also illustrates my point. This female model for Barenia fragrance is clearly a ectomorph, nice and slim body with sharp angular features. Has she been born a male, she would have been considered a framecel loser. Right?


View: https://www.instagram.com/p/C_0mFsMvK-Q/
 
No since those women will breed future men.
 
No since those women will breed future men.
This. Evolution is a slow and creeping process and it takes dozensy if not hundreds of generations to get rid of a certain trait and even then its not guaranted. We have no needs for body hair or abs anymore yet we still have it
 
This. Evolution is a slow and creeping process and it takes dozensy if not hundreds of generations to get rid of a certain trait and even then its not guaranted. We have no needs for body hair or abs anymore yet we still have it
I suppose a skinny man if he were to tone up a little could potentially convince a woman that he could provide her beautiful slim daughters with his genes. Unfortunately most women do not think ahead like that.

This article proves my point.

Women 'should stay away from rugged men if they want beautiful daughters'​


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/10477341/Women-should-stay-away-from-rugged-men-if-they-want-beautiful-daughters.html#:~:text=Daughters could pay the price,cent likelihood of being attractive.
 
Most tall chads are ectomorphs. I don’t think it’s an undesirable trait in of itself. Only when it’s coupled with being a manlet.
 
Skinny ectomorph men are largely undesirable. They are viewed as weak, effeminate to most women. Which means many of them will not procreate.

This trait however is favorable on women. If underweight, they can gain some weight and still remain gracefully slim. If they become skinny fat, a little cardio is all that is needed to tone up. Naturally slim women age like fine wine. After marriage and childbirth they do not get fat like their counterparts (medium and large framed women). As they get older and metabolism slows, they will gain some weight on their hips and can have lovely curves that were once unattainable in their youth. Perfect example would be celebrities like Elizabeth Hurley.

Since most women aren’t attracted to skinny men, this reduces the frequency of the ectomorph gene being passed on. Large majority of the burden rests on the slim ectomorph women to pass on this trait to their potential daughters.

As obesity rate rises in developed countries and the undesirability of thin men, will this genetic trait eventually go extinct?
I hope so
Its a brutal trait to have if your framecel tier
 
Most tall chads are ectomorphs. I don’t think it’s an undesirable trait in of itself. Only when it’s coupled with being a manlet.
Its not an undesirable trait as long it is passed on primarily to the daughters only. Speaking of manlet, what is considered manlet height these days. Anything under 6 feet, 5'10?
 
Most tall chads are ectomorphs. I don’t think it’s an undesirable trait in of itself. Only when it’s coupled with being a manlet.
 
I suppose a skinny man if he were to tone up a little could potentially convince a woman that he could provide her beautiful slim daughters with his genes. Unfortunately most women do not think ahead like that.

This article proves my point.

Women 'should stay away from rugged men if they want beautiful daughters'​


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/10477341/Women-should-stay-away-from-rugged-men-if-they-want-beautiful-daughters.html#:~:text=Daughters could pay the price,cent likelihood of being attractive.
You can get away with having a small frame if you have the right face and height, see young Leonardo DiCaprio
 

Similar threads

AutismKing
Replies
23
Views
1K
ANTAGONIST
ANTAGONIST
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
5
Views
643
blackpillforever
B
Animecel2D
Replies
8
Views
2K
TurkeyKing
TurkeyKing
Spooky_Heejin
Replies
14
Views
722
darkpilledsoldier
darkpilledsoldier

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top