Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Your Guide to Combatting Anti-male Trad-con Language

leftyincel

leftyincel

UNCONTROVERSIAL TO THE POINT OF MILD BANALITY
★★★★
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Posts
794
A lot of trad-con nonsense is thrown around in 'strongman' posturing, but just ends up being anti-male, it's time to stand up for all men, including the failed 'success objects'
Together we can win
Combattingantimalelanguage
 
░▒▓█ E♥ L♥ A♥ B█▓▒░
 
Which one are we supposed to use.....?
 
ive got no clue what this thread is to begin with lul

Neither do I, I expected it to be about terms that are anti-male but this is not what I expected.
 
Neither do I, I expected it to be about terms that are anti-male but this is not what I expected.
actually, taking another look.

this is against the vocab we use to insult cucks and soyboys.

either this is a meme or OP is a cuck.
 
Some are gigachads, some are gigacucks like OP.

The world is so unfair.
 
Why is everything anti-male though? We pay the taxes, we are the programmers and the people who push society forward. I can't get the Jew Overlords logic. Why don't they bully foids? They're useless, besides being consumers
 
Why is everything anti-male though? We pay the taxes, we are the programmers and the people who push society forward. I can't get the Jew Overlords logic. Why don't they bully foids? They're useless, besides being consumers

You said it yourself: they're the consumers. Most marketing is directed at 'foids because of this in fact.

I know for a fact this is true even in the alcohol industry. Makes sense to some degree. Think about it: most men have a select few brands they stick with and are far less likely to be drawn in with catchy slogans and colorful packaging. With women it's the complete opposite. Read about it a few years back in Cigar Aficionado I believe it was.

That, and the fact that they have wet holes that feel amazing to our dicks and are impossible to simulate at this point.
 
You said it yourself: they're the consumers. Most marketing is directed at 'foids because of this in fact.

I know for a fact this is true even in the alcohol industry. Makes sense to some degree. Think about it: most men have a select few brands they stick with and are far less likely to be drawn in with catchy slogans and colorful packaging. With women it's the complete opposite. Read about it a few years back in Cigar Aficionado I believe it was.

That, and the fact that they have wet holes that feel amazing to our dicks and are impossible to simulate at this point.
Can't think of one thing WAAAMEN created except this demonic hell whole called "life" They created ultimately for all men
 
Can't think of one thing WAAAMEN created except this demonic hell whole called "life" They created ultimately for all men

Yeah they don't create shit but again they consume and that's where the money is
 
what about Communist Trad-Cons like me?
 
A lot of trad-con nonsense is thrown around in 'strongman' posturing, but just ends up being anti-male, it's time to stand up for all men, including the failed 'success objects'
Together we can win
View attachment 42046

The fact that that meme was created by a soyboy is problematic...
 
A lot of trad-con nonsense is thrown around in 'strongman' posturing, but just ends up being anti-male, it's time to stand up for all men, including the failed 'success objects'
Together we can win
View attachment 42046
I agree with your point OP. Even if not all of the examples in this image make sense. (Is “momma’s boy really better?) I was once against holding men to a masculine stereotype, as it was sexist. Now I find myself ranting about “real men” as a way to shame the soyboys. Yet I fail many of the tests of traditional masculinity myself.

It probably projection of my own insecurities, to some degree.
 
I agree with your point OP. Even if not all of the examples in this image make sense. (Is “momma’s boy really better?) I was once against holding men to a masculine stereotype, as it was sexist. Now I find myself ranting about “real men” as a way to shame the soyboys. Yet I fail many of the tests of traditional masculinity myself.

It probably projection of my own insecurities, to some degree.

You have to resist.

We can look at a handsome man and accept that he is a Chad. We must be able to look at a masculine man and accept that he is masculine. Otherwise we devolve into a state of soyllipsism.
 
You have to resist.

We can look at a handsome man and accept that he is a Chad. We must be able to look at a masculine man and accept that he is masculine. Otherwise we devolve into a state of soyllipsism.
We certainly can. But if we say that only handsome men are valuable men, aren’t we just repeating the mistake of the foids? Isn’t the tradcon vision of masculinity impossibly tangled with the worship of women?

What does soyllipsism mean?
 

Similar threads

J
Replies
20
Views
801
Neucher The Kanga
Neucher The Kanga
NeverGetUp
Replies
25
Views
599
NeverGetUp
NeverGetUp
The Scarlet Prince
Replies
111
Views
4K
The Scarlet Prince
The Scarlet Prince

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top