For whatever reason I looked up Ozzy Osbourne and looked a few pictures of him to give him a face rating.
He has a good square masculine jawline and not many flaws, but his eye area is bad enough to nerf many of his good features, so I'd say that he's somewhat above average at 6/10 (High-tier Normie, this roughly translates to a 2~4% acceptance rate), but he nichemaxxed with tattoos and stylemaxxed to be a 7/10 (Chadlite with a 5~10% acceptance rate by toilets). I'd say he's genetically only a High-tier Normie, but a Chad in his own right through both nichemaxxing, moneymaxxing, and especially statusmaxxing.
Then I looked up one of his daughters and she has quite a lot of his facial features but then more feminine.
To me she's a clear Stacylite (7/10), a full point higher than her High-tier Normie father (again, he's a Chad for a large percentage of women, but his skull only permits a 6/10), so I wondered why. My guess is that Ozzy is "too masculine", this makes sense as he's a musician in a genre mostly enjoyed by men and is very violent and "manly", so having a masculine look fits his brand quite well, but toilets prefer a man with a mix of masculine and feminine features.
Meanwhile his daughter by the virtue of having less prenatal androgens simply has a more rounded face and toilets usually have better eye areas for whatever reason so she didn't inherent his biggest nerfing point. Like her father she has a good facial harmony which makes her aesthetically pleasing.
This is all despite her having basically the same facial features, hair, body type, Etc. as her father.
This all makes me think of how most of us here can probably make pretty daughters, but because we're born male we ended up ugly.
He has a good square masculine jawline and not many flaws, but his eye area is bad enough to nerf many of his good features, so I'd say that he's somewhat above average at 6/10 (High-tier Normie, this roughly translates to a 2~4% acceptance rate), but he nichemaxxed with tattoos and stylemaxxed to be a 7/10 (Chadlite with a 5~10% acceptance rate by toilets). I'd say he's genetically only a High-tier Normie, but a Chad in his own right through both nichemaxxing, moneymaxxing, and especially statusmaxxing.
Then I looked up one of his daughters and she has quite a lot of his facial features but then more feminine.
To me she's a clear Stacylite (7/10), a full point higher than her High-tier Normie father (again, he's a Chad for a large percentage of women, but his skull only permits a 6/10), so I wondered why. My guess is that Ozzy is "too masculine", this makes sense as he's a musician in a genre mostly enjoyed by men and is very violent and "manly", so having a masculine look fits his brand quite well, but toilets prefer a man with a mix of masculine and feminine features.
Meanwhile his daughter by the virtue of having less prenatal androgens simply has a more rounded face and toilets usually have better eye areas for whatever reason so she didn't inherent his biggest nerfing point. Like her father she has a good facial harmony which makes her aesthetically pleasing.
This is all despite her having basically the same facial features, hair, body type, Etc. as her father.
This all makes me think of how most of us here can probably make pretty daughters, but because we're born male we ended up ugly.
