Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Your daily reminder that "Personality = Looks" has been scientifically proven

saddupbro

saddupbro

Officer
★★
Joined
Jan 6, 2018
Posts
678
[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](Repost of earlier thread. Added more images)[/font]


[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]We've got data!   And a graph![/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]People are so lookist that the graph of Looks vs Personality looks like this:[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
0*S-8DsgmWHAqjAPoL.png

[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The data doesn't even need to be analyzed, any dolt can see it for themselves.[/font]


[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]For any IncelTears loser who needs scientific proof that normies behave most shallowly and are lookist to that extent, t[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]his is straight up 100% scien[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]tific proof and fact.[/font]


[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Here are examples of what it should look like with no bias:[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
151548308791670285
tzL1q.png
[/font]
 
Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional and lying to themselves.

being confident when you're chad is charismatic, being confident when you're incel is obnoxious and trying too hard
 
Louis "cuck" CK literally has a routine about looks being all that matter for getting laid and despite the fact he was famous and popular, he never got shit.
 
People will apply positive traits to you if you're physically attractive. I've been told I'm "childish" or whatever but I've seen Chad-looking men positively act far more petty and childish than I could ever think of but they were always forgiven for it.
 
iFartAtRoasties said:
People will apply positive traits to you if you're physically attractive. I've been told I'm "childish" or whatever but I've seen Chad-looking men positively act far more petty and childish than I could ever think of but they were always forgiven for it.

At this point, any non-serious negative thing said about someone I assume is just an evaluation of their looks.
 
mylifeistrash said:
Louis "cuck" CK literally has a routine about looks being all that matter for getting laid and despite the fact he was famous and popular, he never got shit.

He had to take advantage of his position to make women see his dick.
 
saddupbro said:
He had to take advantage of his position to make women see his dick.

He was exposed to millions through his stand-up, movies, and hosting SNL.

and he STILL had to do stupid fucking shit just to get some old hags to see his dick.
 
mylifeistrash said:
He was exposed to millions through his stand-up, movies, and hosting SNL.

and he STILL had to do stupid fucking shit just to get some old hags to see his dick.

Yeah, just look at him. 

He should've used humor and jokes to get them to see his dick.  :D
 
saddupbro said:
[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif](Repost of earlier thread. Added more images)[/font]


[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]We've got data!   And a graph![/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]People are so lookist that the graph of Looks vs Personality looks like this:[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
0*S-8DsgmWHAqjAPoL.png

[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The data doesn't even need to be analyzed, any dolt can see it for themselves.[/font]


[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]For any IncelTears loser who needs scientific proof that normies behave most shallowly and are lookist to that extent, t[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]his is straight up 100% scien[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]tific proof and fact.[/font]


[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Here are examples of what it should look like with no bias:[/font]

[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
151548308791670285
tzL1q.png
[/font]

The pic got removed, so here it is again:

65NpYl6.jpg
 
It's not fair to use OkCupid and Tinder studies for this. Those sites are ruthless, lookism fueled shitholes.
 
Grain_of_sin said:
It's not fair to use OkCupid and Tinder studies for this. Those sites are ruthless, lookism fueled shitholes.

This is worse than rejecting uglies, but believing they are worst people inside.

You think the human race as a whole is less lookist? I sure hope so.
 
wth, lunapic allows me to change the image posted in the OP.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top