Many people like to constantly perpetuate this myth that popularity doesn’t matter anymore after high school. THEY ARE LYING AND INCORRECT. Popularity STILL exists in college. Anyone who denies this is a bluepilled copefag. People also like to say that highschoolcels will ascend in college. Most of the truecel ones won’t. Only the fakecel ones ascend. Greek life is PROOF that popularity still exists in college. In college, there is a hierarchy, frat boys and sorority girls at the top and incels at the bottom. The frat boys and sorority girls are all chads and stacys who party every weekend, are much more sexually active, socialize much more and also know many more people. They do all of this way more often than even normies do.
the only college where popularity doesn’t exist is community college because that’s where truecels and landwhales go to. but at 4 year uni popularity exists. The only reason you don’t know the names of popular kids in college is because it’s 30,000 retards on one big campus of several buildings while hs is just 2000 retards in a single small building together. If college was 2000 in one building you would know the names of all the popular motherfuckers in college and if hs was 30,000 retards on a big campus of multiple buildings you wouldn’t know the names of the popular people in hs
here’s some data that PROVES popularity exists in college.
In a sample of college undergrads from a liberal arts college, they asked students how much they think popularity exists in college and what is traits they think are associated with popularity. 86.3% of college students said that popularity exists in college.
another study examined how much certain students have sex, have loneliness, etc. here’s a few quotes:
“Drug risk. Social and counterculture crowd affiliations posi- tively predicted drug-related risk-taking behaviors, whereas scholastic and athletic crowd affiliations negatively predicted drug-related risk-taking behaviors.
Academic risk. Counterculture crowd affiliation positively predicted academic-related risk-taking behaviors, whereas scholastic crowd affiliation negatively predicted academic- related risk-taking behaviors.
Alcohol risk. Social and counterculture crowd affiliations posi- tively predicted alcohol-related risk-taking behaviors, whereas scholastic crowd affiliation negatively predicted alcohol- related risk-taking behaviors.
Sex risk. Social and counterculture crowd affiliations positively predicted sex-related risk-taking behaviors
Social–emotional adjustment. Counterculture crowd affiliation positively predicted loneliness, whereas social, athletic, and scholastic crowd affiliations negatively predicted loneliness. Social and scholastic crowd affiliations positively predicted college belongingness, whereas counterculture affiliation negatively predicted college belongingness.”
Here’s
another study and here’s a quote: “There is no good reason to assume that social interaction and social hier- archy lose their valence in emerging adulthood. It is believed that throughout adult life, social relationships remain influential, affecting self-esteem (Leary, Tambor, Terdal, & Downs, 1995), health (Kawachi & Berkman, 2001), and leading to “social pain,” that shares common physiological mechanisms with physical pain, when one is socially excluded (MacDonald & Leary, 2005). Evidence that social status is particularly salient in emerging adult- hood comes from findings of LaFontana and Cillessen (2010), who find both late adolescents (Grades 9-12) and emerging adults (Grades 13-16) to priori- tize enhancing popularity over other social goals including romantic relation- ships. The fact that emerging adults are more likely to prioritize status enhancement over romantic relationships and rule adherence than adoles- cents indicates that peer status plays a large role in the social decision making of emerging adults.”
“Together, these findings suggest that peer status in a school setting in emerg- ing adulthood is quite similar to peer status in adolescence. Research with younger age groups has shown consistently that preference is associated with prosocial traits and behaviors only, whereas popularity is associated with a mixture of prosocial and antisocial traits and behaviors (Cillessen & Rose, 2005). Exactly the same happened in the current emerging adult sample: Preference was related to being prosocial and included but not aggressive. Popularity was related to being prosocial and included and aggressive. The consistency of these results in an 18- to 25-year-old sample with results found across the 10- to 18-year age range is remarkable and points to a universality of the structure of the peer group across a wide age range. These findings also lead to the conclusion that power is still a salient part of group dynamics in emerging adulthood.
This shows that college adults care about popularity and status more than high schoolers.
Another
study shows that 27% of college students go to college just to party. Here’s more
info.
also bullying doesn’t end after high school. It is just as common in college and after college. Here’s my
thread about it
don’t listen to anyone who tells you that girls are less picky in college. You think some autistic 1/10 manlet can date a stacy sorority girl? No. She is gonna date the frat boy chad. People in Greek life aka chads and stacies party a lot and have many more friends while normies have more average amount of friends and we incels are lonely as hell in college
@JosefMengelecel @FastBananaCEO @MountainGorilla @goydivision @Bleachcel @Colvin76
