you guys need to stop fucking coping

[femalesentience]

most of you consider yourselves blackpilled but still blame women, society, culture, normies.....jfl

youre incel because you are genetically undesirable. women dont want to reproduce with you. they dont even want to look at you let alone be in a relationship with you.

the vast majority of males in any species are incel from womb to tomb. they call it survival of the fittest for a reason. women solely select males with the most genetic markers of fitness.

youre not a specially disenfranchised snowflake. youre arbitrarily comparing you circumstances to a brief, ephemeral window in the history of our species during which sexual selection was temporarily mitigated by monogamy.

youre incel because youre ugly. youre incel because women have deemed you unfit to reproduce. its not society, women, the industrial revolution, historical happenstance, cucks, normies, etc.

its biological determinism. thats the blackpill.

 

[Cuyen]

Yes i'm genetically undesirable and i know it...

but still fuck foids,fuck normies and fuck chads

 

[femalesentience]

i agree, fuck them wholeheartedly. but we need to stop blaming and coping. our strength as incels is to hold a cold, analytic mirror to society and human nature and to produce scathing satire, criticisms and analyses. not to wallow in self pity and finger pointing.

 

[Brahcel]

The wider enviroment, esp in the west has made even normies incel tier.

I have normie so called friends who rarely if ever get laid

Yes genes are a big factor but so is the envio

 

[femalesentience]

The wider enviroment, esp in the west has made even normies incel tier.

I have normie so called friends who rarely if ever get laid

Yes genes are a big factor but so is the envio

normies were historically incel for the most part as well. gigachads like khal drogo had harems and other elite males monopolized most of the desirable women. normies competed over passable stock.

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

most of you consider yourselves blackpilled but still blame women, society, culture, normies.....jfl

youre incel because you are genetically undesirable. women dont want to reproduce with you. they dont even want to look at you let alone be in a relationship with you.

the vast majority of males in any species are incel from womb to tomb. they call it survival of the fittest for a reason. women solely select males with the most genetic markers of fitness.

youre not a specially disenfranchised snowflake. youre arbitrarily comparing you circumstances to a brief, ephemeral window in the history of our species during which sexual selection was temporarily mitigated by monogamy.

youre incel because youre ugly. youre incel because women have deemed you unfit to reproduce. its not society, women, the industrial revolution, historical happenstance, cucks, normies, etc.

its biological determinism. thats the blackpill.

That's what the normies wants you to believe, they want nothing more than undesirable men to feel like trash and blame themselves instead of revolting against an unfair world and taking what is theirs. Sure we all know that we're ugly to some extent but for most of us our demands aren't unreasonable, we just want our looksmatch and that is unattainable because of feminism. It's useless to rage against the universe because it made you ugly, but you can fight society because it treats you unfairly.

 

[Brahcel]

normies were historically incel for the most part as well. gigachads like khal drogo had harems and other elite males monopolized most of the desirable women. normies competed over passable stock.

Im talking about 1950s america and world. Most men had a partner

 

[SchrodingersDick]

Should be stickied tbh for everybody to read.

It’s just the way shit is. It’s no one’s fault. It’s just how species on earth work. It just happens to be inconvenient.

Who do you blame for death? For gravity? For the passage of time? Nobody.. that’s just the way it works.

“Extinction is the rule, survival is the exception”

IMO people blame foids for wanting tall hot guys bc they think looks are only skin deep.. like they’re inconsequential, just the way photons bounce off of people And hit your eyes.. looks go far deeper.. there are clear evolutionary reasons for every single thing females find attractive. They are all either survival or reproductive advantages that would be crystal clear to you if we were still living in the jungle.. the comfort of modern life makes it so you don’t see the point of having vertically narrow eyes and broad shoulders.. it’s not “teehee I prefer that cause the media tells me to”.. it’s “teehee I require that because that’s good genes, my sons will get good genes, they will survive, thrive, and reproduce and that makes it so my DNA has a higher likelihood of achieving immortality”

 

[GameDevCel]

brutal blackpill, i still don't want to see the west colapsing due to degenaracy, and it's not even about reproduction anymore, it's about not being threadeted like a fucking serial rapist, for being ugly

 

[femalesentience]

That's what the normies wants you to believe, they want nothing more than undesirable men to feel like trash and blame themselves instead of revolting against an unfair world and taking what is theirs. Sure we all know that we're ugly to some extent but for most of us our demands aren't unreasonable, we just want our looksmatch and that is unattainable because of feminism. It's useless to rage against the universe because it made you ugly, but you can fight society because it treats you unfairly.

lmfao. okay er. youre too far gone. youre incapable of seeing the bigger picture. there is no such thing a looksmax or fairness. no one is entitled to anything. you get the hand ur dealt and you play it to the best of ur ability. women, society, men dont owe u anything. you need to look outside your circumstances. youre less than unimportant. your conception of fairness and equality are arbitrary and unfounded.

Im talking about 1950s america and world. Most men had a partner

1950s america was as close as a society has ever come to utopia and it only lasted a decade until degeneracy set in in the 1960s. a decade isnt comparable to 200k years of human history or 14 billion of evolution.

 

[stuttercel]

Yes i'm genetically undesirable and i know it...

but still fuck foids,fuck normies and fuck chads

adamsin

 

[BluePillsPoison]

Teach us oh wise FebCel.

 

[GameDevCel]

lmfao. okay er. youre too far gone. youre incapable of seeing the bigger picture. there is no such thing a loosmax or fairness. you need to look outside your circumstances. youre less than unimportant. your conception of fairness and equality are arbitrary and unfounded.


1950s america was as close as a society has ever come to utopia and it only lasted a decade until degeneracy set in in the 1960s. a decade isnt comparable to 200k years of human history or 14 billion of evolution.

birth control and a lack of "hot" wars, generated that , we could say the atomic bomb just make going to war not a good idea, and because of the lack of wars western man quickly becamed a bunch of soycucks, and birth control give birth to that shitty hippie movments, any other governament would just shot all that retarded people and get to breed some generation that is not so worthless

 

[Deleted member 14866]

youre incel because you are genetically undesirable. women dont want to reproduce with you. they dont even want to look at you let alone be in a relationship with you.

this, I feel like people who blame feminism are just MSTOW refugees

 

[LastGerman]

our strength as incels is to hold a cold, analytic mirror to society and human nature and to produce scathing satire, criticisms and analyses.

Holding a mirror won't do shit.

 

[femalesentience]

birth control and a lack of "hot" wars, generated that , we could say the atomic bomb just make going to war not a good idea, and because of the lack of wars western man quickly becamed a bunch of soycucks, and birth control give birth to that shitty hippie movments, any other governament would just shot all that retarded people and get to breed some generation that is not so worthless

standards are relative. whether youre competing with soys, normies, chads, terachads or godchad chimaera there will always be a majority incel population by merit of hypergamy.

 

[GameDevCel]

standards of relative. whether youre competing with soys, normies, chads, terachads or godchad chimaera there will always be a majority incel population by merit of hypergamy.

do you think thiss will work in the long run? the fertility rate is dog shit, and the single mun rate is only increasin, it's a question of time to this crap colpase.

that's why past societies enforced monogamy

 

[LDARBuddah]

Good analysing skills fellow greycel

If You cant get the women you feel you deserve there is no reason to live your life on their demands meaning you should enjoy the freedom of the "nothing to lose mentality" that incels have. People in relationship often have to live up to a standard. But an incel doesnt since he is rejected by the ideal way of life.

So id say dont be afraid to play outside the book, dont kiss ass of those who reject you and use your energy to work on yourself from your point of view not from what is expected of you.

 

[GameDevCel]

Good analysing skills fellow greycel

If You cant get the women you feel you deserve there is no reason to live your life on their demands meaning you should enjoy the freedom of the "nothing to lose mentality" that incels have. People in relationship often have to live up to a standard. But an incel doesnt since he is rejected by the ideal way of life.

So id say dont be afraid to play outside the book. Be weird in public, dont kiss ass of those Who reject you and use your energy to work on yourself from your point of view not from what is expected of you.

that's beautyfull , i should pin this somewhere

 

[Bronzehawkattack]

That's what the normies wants you to believe, they want nothing more than undesirable men to feel like trash and blame themselves instead of revolting against an unfair world and taking what is theirs. Sure we all know that we're ugly to some extent but for most of us our demands aren't unreasonable, we just want our looksmatch and that is unattainable because of feminism. It's useless to rage against the universe because it made you ugly, but you can fight society because it treats you unfairly.

 

[femalesentience]

do you think thiss will work in the long run? the fertility rate is dog shit, and the single mun rate is only increasin, it's a question of time to this crap colpase.

that's why past societies enforced monogamy

i dont anticipate a collapse. society will continue to churn forward but will be a hollow spectacle. men will never own up to the harsh reality but will recede further into their copes of choice which will grow more robust and available. look at japan. thats more than likely where we're headed. society will be propped up by men and women droning mindlessly through their empty existences out of pride, narcissism, and lack of any real principles or values.

Good analysing skills fellow greycel

If You cant get the women you feel you deserve there is no reason to live your life on their demands meaning you should enjoy the freedom of the "nothing to lose mentality" that incels have. People in relationship often have to live up to a standard. But an incel doesnt since he is rejected by the ideal way of life.

So id say dont be afraid to play outside the book, dont kiss ass of those who reject you and use your energy to work on yourself from your point of view not from what is expected of you.

amazing perspective. THIS should be the incel ethos

 

[GameDevCel]

i dont anticipate a collapse. society will continue to churn forward but will be a hollow spectacle. men will never own up to the harsh reality but will recede further into their copes of choice which will grow more robust and available. look at japan. thats more than likely where we're headed. society will be propped up by men and women droning mindlessly through their empty existences out of pride, narcissism, and lack of any real principles or values.

amazing perspective. THIS should be the incel ethos

if you think that society is sustanable JFL, colpase may take a hundred or a thousand years, but it's comming for all this societies, the most porbable thing is that some Based Blckpilled society will emerge once everyother society is giga soyed, and just take everything for them just like Genghis Khan used to do

 

[Brahcel]

We all know *who is behind all this. At least us woke niggas

 

[GameDevCel]

We all know *who is behind all this. At least us woke niggas

i still thing this is a (((conspirancy theorie)))

 

[micropenis29]

most of you consider yourselves blackpilled but still blame women, society, culture, normies.....jfl

There's nothing inconsistent about this.

youre incel because you are genetically undesirable. women dont want to reproduce with you. they dont even want to look at you let alone be in a relationship with you.

This is factually incorrect. Only an extremely small percentage of incels are actually sexually repulsive to most women.

The fact that women can choose literally almost any Chad they want to have sex with knowing the government will bail them out by supporting their kids when Chad leaves them makes it seem like most men are sexually repulsive to women, but if women were suddenly not getting such extravagant subsidies, their standards would drop off a cliff.

the vast majority of males in any species are incel from womb to tomb. they call it survival of the fittest for a reason. women solely select males with the most genetic markers of fitness.

You're framing this in the most pessimistic view possible, but there's no reason to do so. Any male in existence by definition is here because his father wasn't incel. And so no man should expect to be incel.

youre not a specially disenfranchised snowflake. youre arbitrarily comparing you circumstances to a brief, ephemeral window in the history of our species during which sexual selection was temporarily mitigated by monogamy.

Monogamy wasn't some "accident." It was a systematic way to create stable and prosperous societies of humans. It worked. It was good for everyone. And the evidence continues to pour in showing why hookup culture supported by ever-expanding governments doesn't work.

Whether by coincidence or not, incels are right when they argue in support of monogamy; it would result in objectively better outcomes for society.

youre incel because youre ugly. youre incel because women have deemed you unfit to reproduce. its not society, women, the industrial revolution, historical happenstance, cucks, normies, etc.

Wrong. We're incel because women have no incentive to take us seriously as mates, since they can just have Chad pump and dump them and then rely on government handouts. That such a Chad/foid-subsidizing government exists is absolutely society's fault.

its biological determinism. thats the blackpill.

The blackpill merely states that, statistically speaking, looks determine the degrees of sexual attraction. It does not state that, below a certain looks threshold, inceldom should ever arise.

 

[Life Wasted]

Two words....Bru-tal

 

[femalesentience]

There's nothing inconsistent about this.



This is factually incorrect. Only an extremely small percentage of incels are actually sexually repulsive to most women.

The fact that women can choose literally almost any Chad they want to have sex with knowing the government will bail them out by supporting their kids when Chad leaves them makes it seem like most men are sexually repulsive to women, but that's not the same thing.



You're framing this in the most pessimistic view possible, but there's no reason to do so. Any male in existence by definition is here because his father wasn't incel. And so no man should expect to be incel.



Monogamy wasn't some "accident." It was a systematic way to create stable and prosperous societies of humans. It worked. It was good for everyone. And the evidence continues to pour in showing why hookup culture supported by ever-expanding governments doesn't work.

Whether by coincidence or not, incels are right when they argue in support of monogamy that it would result in objectively better outcomes for society.



We're incel because women have no incentive to take us seriously as mates, since they can just have Chad pump and dump them and then rely on government handouts. So yes, that such a Chad/foid-subsidizing government exists is absolutely society's fault.



The blackpill merely states that, statistically speaking, looks determine the degrees of sexual attraction. It does not state that below a certain looks threshold, inceldom should ever arise.

you're operating off a just-world hypothesis and you dont understand what hypergamy ultimately implies. whatever arguments you have regarding how society SHOULD operate are irrelevant. this isnt about that at all. im speaking strictly in terms of biological determinism which is an irrefutable reality unlike socioeconomic or political happenstance.

nature selects only for elite males. it not even 80/20. its like 98/2. women will participate in monogmy if theyre forced to but ultimately theyve shown they do not want to.

 

[micropenis29]

you're operating off a just-world hypothesis and you dont understand what hypergamy ultimately implies.

Incorrect. And actually, I probably understand hypergamy much better than you.

whatever arguments you have regarding how society SHOULD operate are irrelevant.

They're entirely relevant, since your whole premise is that incels are "coping" by blaming society for their problems.

this isnt about that at all. im speaking strictly in terms of biological determinism which is an irrefutable reality unlike socioeconomic or political happenstance.

Don't try to weasel out of your original post. And strict biological determinism (which you're clearly deeply confused about) is no more irrefutable than socioeconomic or political realities.

nature selects only for elite males. it not even 80/20. its like 98/2.

But you don't know what an "elite male" even is. You're conflating the blackpill with natural selection and switching back and forth between them when it suits you; I'm calling you out for this nonsense because they're 2 entirely different things.

Nature may have selected 98/2 in the past but it's impossible to know the full sets of characteristics that continually distinguish those 2%. Society right now is deciding that looks should be the defining characteristic, and ugly men are rightfully outraged at that.

women will participate in monogmy if theyre forced to but ultimately theyve shown they do not want to.

Of course they don't want to. LMFAO. That is irrelevant. Nobody wants to work either. Does that make a 100% unemployment rate reasonable or even functional? Of course not.

The only reason women get away with not participating in monogamy is because society enables it by granting them virtually unlimited economic power in the form of voting rights, government handouts, child-support subsidies, healthcare, etc.

 

[femalesentience]

lol bro i cant take u srsly at all. u dont understand and misrepresent all my points and i can tell youre just arguing to argue and not really understanding what youre addressing.

you seem to have contradicted yourself

okay. nature. genetics. biology.

 

[littlemanhikicel]

And why an ugly foid have to pass her genes? and we not? Fuck that redpill biology shit

 

[micropenis29]

lol bro i cant take u srsly at all. u dont understand and misrepresent all my points and i can tell youre just arguing to argue and not really understanding what youre addressing.

Oh trust me, I knew you wouldn't understand. My comments weren't for you; they were for everyone else. You're hopeless.

 

[femalesentience]

And why an ugly foid have to pass her genes? and we not? Fuck that redpill biology shit

if u want to talk about societal solutions then eugenics is the answer. theres no dignity in life as a subhuman. no one should pass on their genes unless theyre psl 9 6'2+ immune to hairloss etc. neither foids lest they be elite as well.

Oh trust me, I knew you wouldn't understand. My comments weren't for you; they were for everyone else. You're hopeless.

look dumbfuck i understand u clearly and thats why i can see how superficial and frivolous your ideas are. you refuse to look deeper and cope with muh monogamy, muh society, muh socially constructed determinism.

ur coping harder than anyone here.

 

[micropenis29]

look dumbfuck i understand u clearly and thats why i can see how superficial and frivolous your ideas are. you refuse to look deeper and cope with muh monogamy, muh society, muh socially constructed determinism.

ur coping harder than anyone here.

Somebody's triggered!

 

[KingOfRome]

Based graycel. We have regressed as a society. JFL at "take what's ours, what's owed to us," the world owes you nothing, faggot. The world brought you into this world as a living mockery. You exist because the pyramid needs a bottom.

 

[Italcel]

sub20 IQ, pls get a middle school biology book. Cuckpilled piece of shit, "it's nature brah, survival of the fittest = facial aesthetic" TOPKEK

 

[femalesentience]

Somebody's triggered!

cucktears detected

 

[Brahcel]

There's nothing inconsistent about this.



This is factually incorrect. Only an extremely small percentage of incels are actually sexually repulsive to most women.

The fact that women can choose literally almost any Chad they want to have sex with knowing the government will bail them out by supporting their kids when Chad leaves them makes it seem like most men are sexually repulsive to women, but if women were suddenly not getting such extravagant subsidies, their standards would drop off a cliff.



You're framing this in the most pessimistic view possible, but there's no reason to do so. Any male in existence by definition is here because his father wasn't incel. And so no man should expect to be incel.



Monogamy wasn't some "accident." It was a systematic way to create stable and prosperous societies of humans. It worked. It was good for everyone. And the evidence continues to pour in showing why hookup culture supported by ever-expanding governments doesn't work.

Whether by coincidence or not, incels are right when they argue in support of monogamy; it would result in objectively better outcomes for society.



Wrong. We're incel because women have no incentive to take us seriously as mates, since they can just have Chad pump and dump them and then rely on government handouts. That such a Chad/foid-subsidizing government exists is absolutely society's fault.



The blackpill merely states that, statistically speaking, looks determine the degrees of sexual attraction. It does not state that, below a certain looks threshold, inceldom should ever arise.

Owned. Lol. If he argues that. I will block him

 

[femalesentience]

sub20 IQ, pls get a middle school biology book. Cuckpilled piece of shit, "it's nature brah, survival of the fittest = facial aesthetic" TOPKEK

high iq detected

Based graycel. We have regressed as a society. JFL at "take what's ours, what's owed to us," the world owes you nothing, faggot. The world brought you into this world as a living mockery. You exist because the pyramid needs a bottom.

yes but the cope runs deep

Owned. Lol. If he argues that. I will block him

block me if it helps u cope to sleep better

 

[Brahcel]

cucktears detected

Put on ignore. Fuckin foid

 

[littlemanhikicel]

if u want to talk about societal solutions then eugenics is the answer. theres no dignity in life as a subhuman. no one should pass on their genes unless theyre psl 9 6'2+ immune to hairloss etc. neither foids lest they be elite as well.


look dumbfuck i understand u clearly and thats why i can see how superficial and frivolous your ideas are. you refuse to look deeper and cope with muh monogamy, muh society, muh socially constructed determinism.

ur coping harder than anyone here.

Then society also take out of the equation the handicapped, retarded, people with down syndrome, ppl with cancer, uvh ... etc(men and women). Otherwise, I do not accept that exclusion only to us "as the only ones we put aside" while the others have all the resources at their disposal.

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

lmfao. okay er. youre too far gone. youre incapable of seeing the bigger picture. there is no such thing a looksmax or fairness. no one is entitled to anything. you get the hand ur dealt and you play it to the best of ur ability. women, society, men dont owe u anything. you need to look outside your circumstances. youre less than unimportant. your conception of fairness and equality are arbitrary and unfounded.

No it's you who are lacking the comprehensive ability, my concept of fairness is perfect. We live in a society that goes by because people are working together, as a man you are supposed to work, pay taxes to fund welfare, and do military service, the women does nothing essential but makes babies and cares for them, so everyone contributes to a greater collectivism.

If you are performing your duty but get nothing out of it (no gf) you have no stake in it and no reason to do anything, and in theory society could collapse at this very moment if all the people (loser men) would just realize that they are slaves working for free and would immediately stop contributing. Nature/God/whatever has no obligation to provide for your life and you can't entitled because of that, but the society that you provide for has.

 

[femalesentience]

No it's you who are lacking the comprehensive ability, my concept of fairness is perfect. We live in a society that goes by because people are working together, as a man you are supposed to work, pay taxes to fund welfare, and do military service, the women does nothing essential but makes babies and cares for them, so everyone contributes to a greater collectivism.

If you are performing your duty but get nothing out of it (no gf) you have no stake in it and no reason to do anything, and in theory society could collapse at this very moment if all the people (loser men) would just realize that they are slaves working for free and would immediately stop contributing. Nature/God/whatever has no obligation to provide for your life and you can't entitled because of that, but the society that you provide for has.

youre not digging deeper. i cant put it any more plainly. biological. deteminism. the society u describe is a flash in the pan of evolutionary history. a blink of an eye. whatever u feel it owed you or by whatever mechanism it was briefly sustained is irrelevant to the greater prerogative or natural and sexual selection.

Then society also take out of the equation the handicapped, retarded, people with down syndrome, ppl with cancer, uvh ... etc(men and women). Otherwise, I do not accept that exclusion only to us "as the only ones we put aside" while the others have all the resources at their disposal.

99% of ppl would be weeded from the genepool. not just incels. everyone sub gigachad. and even then idk if eugenics is even feasible or conclusive. hypergamy may reduce gigachads to incels in favor of hyperionchads.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

There is no reason for us to accept the regression to biological barbarity that feminism has caused -- a primitive state of nature where females choose their mates according to anachronistic evolutionary traits.

- your looksmatch

Hypergamy may be natural, but what's natural is not necessarily right. You're making a sort of "just world" fallacy in your own way, by suggesting that Nature should rule and that any attempts to socially modify it contravene its justly held authority.

Even from the perspective of biological determinism, it is by no means determined that an incel shouldn't procreate. You are incorrect when you state that coercing females isn't natural and that they are intrinsically free to choose their mates -- rape is totally natural, for example, and if female monogamy with sub8s is to be considered collective rape, then you can think of it as a sub8 evolutionary strategy.

 

[Darth Cialis]

Lmao you sound like a sub 8 theorist I think you are the one coping here.

 

[rahultmnt]

200+iq
yes this is the true essence of the blackpill.. roasties are just doing what comes to them naturally

 

[femalesentience]

There is no reason for us to accept the regression to biological barbarity that feminism has caused -- a primitive state of nature where females choose their mates according to anachronistic evolutionary traits.

View attachment 93846
- your looksmatch

Hypergamy may be natural, but what's natural is not necessarily right. You're making a sort of "just world" fallacy in your own way, by suggesting that Nature should rule and that any attempts to socially modify it contravene its justly held authority.

Even from the perspective of biological determinism, it is by no means determined that an incel shouldn't procreate. You are incorrect when you say that coercing females isn't natural and that they are intrinsically free to choose their mates -- rape is totally natural, for example, and if female monogamy with sub8s is to be considered collective rape, then you can think of it as a sub8 evolutionary strategy.

its not a regression. this is simply as things are, have always been, and will forever be. the traits they select for arent anachronistic - they signify robust immunocompetency and physical ability.

im not even talking about right or wrong. im not saying nature is right. im stating what is. there is no moral argument here. just a statement of observable fact.

sub8s can do whatever they want within the realm of possibility to mate but will find middling and unworthwhile success at best. if you want to consider this sexual strategy so be it but its ultimately peripheral to the greater prerogatives of natural selection, sexual selection, and hypergamy.

 

[littlemanhikicel]

There is no reason for us to accept the regression to biological barbarity that feminism has caused -- a primitive state of nature where females choose their mates according to anachronistic evolutionary traits.

View attachment 93846
- your looksmatch

Hypergamy may be natural, but what's natural is not necessarily right. You're making a sort of "just world" fallacy in your own way, by suggesting that Nature should rule and that any attempts to socially modify it contravene its justly held authority.

Even from the perspective of biological determinism, it is by no means determined that an incel shouldn't procreate. You are incorrect when you say that coercing females isn't natural and that they are intrinsically free to choose their mates -- rape is totally natural, for example, and if female monogamy with sub8s is to be considered collective rape, then you can think of it as a sub8 evolutionary strategy.

Infinite IQ
In fact in a natural world we could stealthe foids or rape if we wanted because as you said it would be a strategy to be able to reproduce.
and we would not have the moral restrictions of modern society.
since now foids are the only ones free of morals, values.

 

[Blacktarpill]

Sounds like someone(guess who it is) trying to make me quit. Make me quit steam. Steam is cope. A good one. Good.

 

[GameDevCel]

fuck nature and biology, our acenstor din't worked 10 thousand years inventing shit, so we would regress to the primitive stage of foids hypergamy, do you think we are going to colonize the stars with this dog shit fertility rate?

 

[Deleted member 14430]

Teach us oh wise FebCel.

Inb4 he was on PUAhate

Lmao you sound like a sub 8 theorist I think you are the one coping here.