No I just think that you're a yapper.
Like, if you can't communicate with conventional language well enough and you chose enother language, performative art, music or drawing pictures, then I guess you're still are saying nothing of value bro.
You're simply wearing drapes of fame that "art" gained throughout years thanks to artists who contributed much to society and you think by using a mean these artists used your expression suddenly becomes better as the mean itself is linked heavily with people who added value to culture? So the mean ads like some coefficient extra value and not the content in itself is the value?
It doesn't work like that. You're just dick riding and watering down the quality with useless shit.
Let modern art be of use for artists who choose it to protest, whilst capable of creating art that is not "modern". At the very least these artists are arguing like that for a reason. You sort want to know why they did that rather then doing the conventional thing. Not to mention they can be bad people who really could just do it for money and controversy. You're not a different species.
And lets be real, real now, you're not chosen by a methaphysical force or some spirit if you just produce art, you are just a fucking human, you can have bad takes, and you kinda did with the latest work. I know its really nice to be seen as different, I know its very enticing to think you're a pioneer of identity and some sort of shaman or priest who reaches into the depths of collective humanity so that you can see yourself as a speaker for others. It allows you to abuse people and call them uncultured or worse.
But you're still a yapper. I can speak german (I have an certified C1 level) doesn't make me a native speaker. You can draw, make music, dance, etc. doesn't make you an artist yet. You like physics so you use it for fancy stuff so that you can use peoples desire to seek deeper meaning and create a pseudoreligious effect around the work you've made - Ok. This message is socially constructed, you said nothing actually did you? Its basic presupositions and misccomunication.
"Your reaction validates-" No dear.
Its cope, just like saying people who are in the present called insane in the future will be considered as smart.
Its ok. We try but doesn't always work. You'll do better the next time.
Play into your strength for the time rather then exploit the weaknesses and vices of society (which I doubt you see), make porn. It will be of use.
And you know, make it with overhypersexualized women, so that you can make moeny of it to later comlain you are forced by capitalims to conform to these cultural standards. Its not like art and artists in general created something of value by quitting following the trend and going their own, whilst suffering the opression of originality. You're just like them even if you sumbit, because you have an adjective, it makes you a part of the group, you're their equal.
Right?
Like, if you can't communicate with conventional language well enough and you chose enother language, performative art, music or drawing pictures, then I guess you're still are saying nothing of value bro.
You're simply wearing drapes of fame that "art" gained throughout years thanks to artists who contributed much to society and you think by using a mean these artists used your expression suddenly becomes better as the mean itself is linked heavily with people who added value to culture? So the mean ads like some coefficient extra value and not the content in itself is the value?
It doesn't work like that. You're just dick riding and watering down the quality with useless shit.
Let modern art be of use for artists who choose it to protest, whilst capable of creating art that is not "modern". At the very least these artists are arguing like that for a reason. You sort want to know why they did that rather then doing the conventional thing. Not to mention they can be bad people who really could just do it for money and controversy. You're not a different species.
And lets be real, real now, you're not chosen by a methaphysical force or some spirit if you just produce art, you are just a fucking human, you can have bad takes, and you kinda did with the latest work. I know its really nice to be seen as different, I know its very enticing to think you're a pioneer of identity and some sort of shaman or priest who reaches into the depths of collective humanity so that you can see yourself as a speaker for others. It allows you to abuse people and call them uncultured or worse.
But you're still a yapper. I can speak german (I have an certified C1 level) doesn't make me a native speaker. You can draw, make music, dance, etc. doesn't make you an artist yet. You like physics so you use it for fancy stuff so that you can use peoples desire to seek deeper meaning and create a pseudoreligious effect around the work you've made - Ok. This message is socially constructed, you said nothing actually did you? Its basic presupositions and misccomunication.
"Your reaction validates-" No dear.
Its cope, just like saying people who are in the present called insane in the future will be considered as smart.
Its ok. We try but doesn't always work. You'll do better the next time.
Play into your strength for the time rather then exploit the weaknesses and vices of society (which I doubt you see), make porn. It will be of use.
And you know, make it with overhypersexualized women, so that you can make moeny of it to later comlain you are forced by capitalims to conform to these cultural standards. Its not like art and artists in general created something of value by quitting following the trend and going their own, whilst suffering the opression of originality. You're just like them even if you sumbit, because you have an adjective, it makes you a part of the group, you're their equal.
Right?
and nobody wants to listen to me and I feel like I have so much to add to the world.
