Teehehe.
Assuming they wouldn't let ugly men die either if a virus made sex with women a necessity like drinking/eating/sleeping and after 4 days without a blowjob you explode.
By their logic YOU DO NOT DIE IF YOU ARE FORCED TO HAVE SEX EITHER
This "you don't die if" logic opens the gate to any kind of abuse and neglect as long as you are granted water, meals, healthcare and a bed.
If they counteract with "not giving sex is different than forcing to have sex" they are moving the goal post thus invalidating the idea that only the essential tools for surviving really matter/are something you're entitled to
Assuming they wouldn't let ugly men die either if a virus made sex with women a necessity like drinking/eating/sleeping and after 4 days without a blowjob you explode.
By their logic YOU DO NOT DIE IF YOU ARE FORCED TO HAVE SEX EITHER
This "you don't die if" logic opens the gate to any kind of abuse and neglect as long as you are granted water, meals, healthcare and a bed.
If they counteract with "not giving sex is different than forcing to have sex" they are moving the goal post thus invalidating the idea that only the essential tools for surviving really matter/are something you're entitled to
