I have seen this argument used by many persons denouncing Incels. "You are not entitled to a virgin, she is not a slut if she has slept with men before." Who are these women sleeping with that we can't expect a virgin? There is statistically a higher number (some estimates 30%) of virgin adult men. So that means that some men are double or even triple dipping into the dating pool that almost no women are virgins by adulthood. This is a stupid argument because it enforces the idea that women can get sex easily or are falling for "chad" men that double dip into the pool. Also means that women are at fault as they are allowing these men to do this.
This is also a blatant gaslighting attempt to paint all incels as "picky virgin only". Which is not true because there are some thirsty fuckers on this forum that will take almost anything except morbidly obese.
Lets dissemble this argument even more as it ties into the popular argument that the opposition like to use is how men should date in the same category as themselves. Most of forum talk about the looks match stating that they would love to date someone who matches them. So if a woman is not a virgin at the time of courtship that means she is already unequal to a man.
Crude arguments by soy brains.
This is also a blatant gaslighting attempt to paint all incels as "picky virgin only". Which is not true because there are some thirsty fuckers on this forum that will take almost anything except morbidly obese.
Lets dissemble this argument even more as it ties into the popular argument that the opposition like to use is how men should date in the same category as themselves. Most of forum talk about the looks match stating that they would love to date someone who matches them. So if a woman is not a virgin at the time of courtship that means she is already unequal to a man.
Crude arguments by soy brains.
