Yet another erroneous article about The Incel...

[Kent]

Basically saying that men SHOULD NOT have access to prostitution or sexbots. I don't understand why no one says that women aren't entitled to ..

1. Tall men (80% desire this)
2. Men who earn more (80% desire this)
3. Men who will provide for them when unable to themselves due to childcare (maybe 98% desire this)

A legit comment to her article though:

Yet many prostitutes will testify that half or more of their clients are looking for intimacy more than for sex. And in American society, intimacy without sex is not accessible to men. Maybe we need to reframe the problem as one of physical loneliness, not sexual need. If this is the problem, then I would say "yes". This is a biological need, and as such, people do have a right to intimacy, to be touched, to be cared for.


Cliffs:





https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...oss-douthat-got-wrong/?utm_term=.ffbd08e85154

 

[Kent]

THERE HAS BEEN NO MOTIVE ACTUALLY STATED FOR TORONTO

...only an extremely likely 4Chan troll-post of a SINGLE facebook image (that even FACEBOOK THE CORPORATION did not legitimize as being valid...read what Facebook actually stated!).

But I guess we shall see because eventually this guy will go to trial and speak his mind.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

That's some big font stuff there bro

 

[Kent]

That's some big font stuff there bro

BECAUSE FOR SOME REASON PEOPLE KEEP FORGETTING...EVEN ON THIS DAMN FORUM!!!!


p.s. It is driving me crazy that nobody has mentioned that the Toronto guy uses incel terms but doesn't seem to have any post history, concurrent posts or official motive after all this time...a likely 4Chan post is being accepted as true.