(((THIS THREAD IS MADE FOR THOSE FUCKING BBC OR ETHNIC SPAMMERS, IF YOU SEE ONE OF THOSE NIGGERS LINK THEM TO THIS THREAD)))
If you've ever argued with a normie, foid or hell even another incel and you've shown them a statistic you've undoubtedly heard a variation of one of the following:
"Not all people are like that. It depends on the person!"
"Stereotypes and generalizations are bad, harmful, and wrong!!"
"Yo bro i know this Indian and he's 6'3 and slays fuck you and your stats"
The "politically correct" faggot today is infected with the mentality that denies any sort of patterns in people, and denies the entire science of genetics, and seems very prevalent among many people today, especially in the US. Though odd and illogical, it has spread widely and into the popular mindset today For some reason, these people, in their "righteous" cause to please and unify the people of the world with political correctness, are willing to deny facts and reality to support their politically correct beliefs. These people will outright reject any and all attempts to explain sociology or the blackpill "You cant measure sociology inkie! its not a real science!" <--- real shit a foid has said to me btw
They seem to ignore all differences in people, in order to get agreement from all, and offend none. Thus, when it comes to choosing between truth and political correctness, they choose the correctness.
For some strange reason, these people tend to be women, young, and leftist liberals. I'll lump them all together as "Normies" for simplicities sake.
Normies usually have no problem with labeling objects and things, but when it comes to people, they seem to take it personally and act like you've broken some sacred law. Any observation of differences or patterns in people is immediately labeled as "generalizing" or "stereotyping", and rebuked by one of strawman statements above. They use strawman arguments which are basically a logical fallacy where they misrepresent your argument "Are you saying all women are fucking evil and should be raped? fucking incel"
There are so many fucking normies, especially among Westernized liberals. As such, I find that when I make an observation about people and try to share my findings, I am put between a rock and a hard place, because on the one hand, normies will take offense and attack me for it. But on the other, if I say that there are no group differences and that people are all the same, that would obviously be a false statement. Thus I am forced to choose between lying and offending them.
The fact of the matter is, PATTERNS AND DIFFRENCES BETWEEN GROUPS EXIST! Contrary to what normies say, people who make observations about others are never claiming that ALL people in that group are like that. They are merely reporting and defining general PATTERNS in people based on their experiences, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Patterns exist, even in people, so it is illogical for normies to constantly deny them. Scientists observe and define patterns in people, as well as statisticians, researchers, marketers, businessmen, insurance companies, and even sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, historians, etc. Observing patterns in people is useful in so many ways that are too numerous to even list, adding to one’s understanding of things. For example, auto insurance companies conclude that young males are higher risk drivers than young females, so they set car insurance premiums for young males higher. So does that mean that these insurance companies claim that "all" young males are high risk drivers, as normies would protest? No, of course not. It's merely a statistic that they need to properly assess risk and cost, or else the business would go belly-up. If only normies would get that....
It is true that we are all individuals (especially in individualistic cultures like America) but PATTERNS of differences DO EXIST between people of different regions, cultures, situations and groups. So yes, individual differences exist, but so do group differences. For instance, if you go to a sewing class you will notice mostly women and few or no men. That's not generalizing, it's simply a pattern and reality that anyone can observe. Likewise with yoga classes or psychic fairs. But if you go to a NASCAR racing event or a boxing match, you will notice far more men than women there. An example of a national difference is this: America has about a 50 percent divorce rate, but the divorce rate in most other countries is lower. That's an example of a national difference. So again, individual differences do exist, but so do group differences. Normies don't seem to get that. Things and people are NOT in the same percentages everywhere. For example, people in the netherlands there are a greater percentage of men are over 5 ft 7 than in Vietnam. That's not generalizing, but a measurable and well documented fact and "pattern". Overall, Whites tend to be taller and bigger size-wise than Asians in general; Americans tend to be fatter than Chinese people are, etc. There are more blacks in africa, and more asians in asia. Again, that's not generalizing or racism. It's just reality, a pattern fully established and easily observable. DID I SAY THAT ALL WHITES ARE TALLER THEN ASIANS? NO
DID I SAY ALL 100% OF ALL DUTCH MEN ARE TALLER THEN 100% OF ALL VIET MEN? NO!
DID I SAY ONLY BLACKS LIVE IN AFRICA, AND ONLY ASIANS LIVE IN ASIA? NO!
The point is: Patterns and differences are a reality. Why deny truth in favor of political correctness? I prefer the truth.
Normies love to point out that stereotypes and generalizations hurt people by misjudging them, and you cant just generalize a whole group of people! Trying to predict people’s behaviors by putting them into formulas often fails, even when done by the world’s top experts.
Let’s give an example to show what I mean. Suppose I saw eight X’s and two O’s fall into a grid. Now, it would be fair for me to honestly report that there are eight X’s and two O’s. And I could logically predict that when the next character falls into the grid, there will be an 80 percent chance it will be an X and a 20 percent chance it will be an O. Now that is not stereotyping or generalizing. It is merely reporting the pattern observed. One who does this can still keep an open mind and know that he/she could be wrong. It’s as simple as that. But there is no need to try to pretend that there are an equal number of X’s and O’s or that no pattern exists, just to please the beliefs of normies and avoid offending their beliefs that patterns don’t exist.
TLDR: PATTERNS DO EXIST. JUST BECAUSE THERE IS A PATTERN DOESNT MEAN WE ARE GENERALIZING! NOBODY EVER SAYS 100% OF WHITES ARE BETTER LOOKING, TALLER THEN ETHNICS! IT IS SIMPLY A MEASUREABLE AND DOCUMENTED FACT!
If you've ever argued with a normie, foid or hell even another incel and you've shown them a statistic you've undoubtedly heard a variation of one of the following:
"Not all people are like that. It depends on the person!"
"Stereotypes and generalizations are bad, harmful, and wrong!!"
"Yo bro i know this Indian and he's 6'3 and slays fuck you and your stats"
The "politically correct" faggot today is infected with the mentality that denies any sort of patterns in people, and denies the entire science of genetics, and seems very prevalent among many people today, especially in the US. Though odd and illogical, it has spread widely and into the popular mindset today For some reason, these people, in their "righteous" cause to please and unify the people of the world with political correctness, are willing to deny facts and reality to support their politically correct beliefs. These people will outright reject any and all attempts to explain sociology or the blackpill "You cant measure sociology inkie! its not a real science!" <--- real shit a foid has said to me btw
They seem to ignore all differences in people, in order to get agreement from all, and offend none. Thus, when it comes to choosing between truth and political correctness, they choose the correctness.
For some strange reason, these people tend to be women, young, and leftist liberals. I'll lump them all together as "Normies" for simplicities sake.
Normies usually have no problem with labeling objects and things, but when it comes to people, they seem to take it personally and act like you've broken some sacred law. Any observation of differences or patterns in people is immediately labeled as "generalizing" or "stereotyping", and rebuked by one of strawman statements above. They use strawman arguments which are basically a logical fallacy where they misrepresent your argument "Are you saying all women are fucking evil and should be raped? fucking incel"
There are so many fucking normies, especially among Westernized liberals. As such, I find that when I make an observation about people and try to share my findings, I am put between a rock and a hard place, because on the one hand, normies will take offense and attack me for it. But on the other, if I say that there are no group differences and that people are all the same, that would obviously be a false statement. Thus I am forced to choose between lying and offending them.
The fact of the matter is, PATTERNS AND DIFFRENCES BETWEEN GROUPS EXIST! Contrary to what normies say, people who make observations about others are never claiming that ALL people in that group are like that. They are merely reporting and defining general PATTERNS in people based on their experiences, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Patterns exist, even in people, so it is illogical for normies to constantly deny them. Scientists observe and define patterns in people, as well as statisticians, researchers, marketers, businessmen, insurance companies, and even sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, historians, etc. Observing patterns in people is useful in so many ways that are too numerous to even list, adding to one’s understanding of things. For example, auto insurance companies conclude that young males are higher risk drivers than young females, so they set car insurance premiums for young males higher. So does that mean that these insurance companies claim that "all" young males are high risk drivers, as normies would protest? No, of course not. It's merely a statistic that they need to properly assess risk and cost, or else the business would go belly-up. If only normies would get that....
It is true that we are all individuals (especially in individualistic cultures like America) but PATTERNS of differences DO EXIST between people of different regions, cultures, situations and groups. So yes, individual differences exist, but so do group differences. For instance, if you go to a sewing class you will notice mostly women and few or no men. That's not generalizing, it's simply a pattern and reality that anyone can observe. Likewise with yoga classes or psychic fairs. But if you go to a NASCAR racing event or a boxing match, you will notice far more men than women there. An example of a national difference is this: America has about a 50 percent divorce rate, but the divorce rate in most other countries is lower. That's an example of a national difference. So again, individual differences do exist, but so do group differences. Normies don't seem to get that. Things and people are NOT in the same percentages everywhere. For example, people in the netherlands there are a greater percentage of men are over 5 ft 7 than in Vietnam. That's not generalizing, but a measurable and well documented fact and "pattern". Overall, Whites tend to be taller and bigger size-wise than Asians in general; Americans tend to be fatter than Chinese people are, etc. There are more blacks in africa, and more asians in asia. Again, that's not generalizing or racism. It's just reality, a pattern fully established and easily observable. DID I SAY THAT ALL WHITES ARE TALLER THEN ASIANS? NO
DID I SAY ALL 100% OF ALL DUTCH MEN ARE TALLER THEN 100% OF ALL VIET MEN? NO!
DID I SAY ONLY BLACKS LIVE IN AFRICA, AND ONLY ASIANS LIVE IN ASIA? NO!
The point is: Patterns and differences are a reality. Why deny truth in favor of political correctness? I prefer the truth.
Normies love to point out that stereotypes and generalizations hurt people by misjudging them, and you cant just generalize a whole group of people! Trying to predict people’s behaviors by putting them into formulas often fails, even when done by the world’s top experts.
Let’s give an example to show what I mean. Suppose I saw eight X’s and two O’s fall into a grid. Now, it would be fair for me to honestly report that there are eight X’s and two O’s. And I could logically predict that when the next character falls into the grid, there will be an 80 percent chance it will be an X and a 20 percent chance it will be an O. Now that is not stereotyping or generalizing. It is merely reporting the pattern observed. One who does this can still keep an open mind and know that he/she could be wrong. It’s as simple as that. But there is no need to try to pretend that there are an equal number of X’s and O’s or that no pattern exists, just to please the beliefs of normies and avoid offending their beliefs that patterns don’t exist.
TLDR: PATTERNS DO EXIST. JUST BECAUSE THERE IS A PATTERN DOESNT MEAN WE ARE GENERALIZING! NOBODY EVER SAYS 100% OF WHITES ARE BETTER LOOKING, TALLER THEN ETHNICS! IT IS SIMPLY A MEASUREABLE AND DOCUMENTED FACT!
