Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

WTF IS THIS ART?

AccountError

AccountError

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Posts
5,547
1587660528932


LOOK AT THE NOSES :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek: BLACK BLONDE BITCH :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
didn't load for me
 
Don’t know don’t care
 
low iq cringe
 
Don’t know who they’re
 
Fuck is this shit
 
LOOK AT THE NOSES


Crazy Jews Lose It Over Great New Fine Arts Painting

98A5A053 9D38 4D92 8264 40573B1F391C

 
Feminist art, look at the females legs.
 
who the fuck draws this shit
 
welcome to the world of cursed tumblr redraws

1587763500109
 
>hating an art style because it is ugly

brutal blackpill ngl. No one wants art of people with ugly faces its over.
 
Wtf is wrong with their noses?
 
>hating an art style because it is ugly

brutal blackpill ngl. No one wants art of people with ugly faces its over.
no man we hate it because its the generic tumblr crap style of "drawing"
they refuse to improve and want people to accept it how it is and praise them
 
no man we hate it because its the generic tumblr crap style of "drawing"
they refuse to improve and want people to accept it how it is and praise them
cope you dislike it because it is ugly
 
cope you dislike it because it is ugly
alright that is partially true, but art is meant to look nice and be pleasing to the eye. lookism doesn't apply to art because humans are not made to look nice, but art is
 
but art is meant to look nice and be pleasing to the eye. lookism doesn't apply to art because humans are not made to look nice, but art is
Art isn't always meant to look nice tbh, at least according to a lot of artists. Art is only thought of of having to look nice since people tend to like looking at nice looking things vs ugly things. Art is about sending a message or making a statement. If ugliness sends that message, that makes it valid.
 
Art isn't always meant to look nice tbh, at least according to a lot of artists. Art is only thought of of having to look nice since people tend to like looking at nice looking things vs ugly things. Art is about sending a message or making a statement. If ugliness sends that message, that makes it valid.
art as a medium to carry a message should still strive to be beautiful or else it becomes a statement and no longer art. some art can carry profound messages, but they are beautiful aesthetically message notwithstanding, and do not rely on the message alone to create aesthetic value. ie. there were some foid "artist" who used tampons as a art exhibition, and many other modern art is just "message" to validate itself without trying to look good
The 5 Most Iconic Paintings by Jackson Pollock - The Hundreds

Jackson pollocks art lacks meaning and aesthetics
Tate and MoMa 'playing catch up' in collections of modern African ...this one symbolises mental illness or something
both look terrible and have little merit as art,
 
would not bang
 
all of a sudden I feel... empowered!
 
art as a medium to carry a message should still strive to be beautiful or else it becomes a statement and no longer art. some art can carry profound messages, but they are beautiful aesthetically message notwithstanding, and do not rely on the message alone to create aesthetic value. ie. there were some foid "artist" who used tampons as a art exhibition, and many other modern art is just "message" to validate itself without trying to look good
The 5 Most Iconic Paintings by Jackson Pollock - The Hundreds

Jackson pollocks art lacks meaning and aesthetics
Tate and MoMa 'playing catch up' in collections of modern African ...'playing catch up' in collections of modern African ...this one symbolises mental illness or something
both look terrible and have little merit as art,
modern art sucks because it is lazy not because its not beautiful though. If I drew a hyper realistic portrait of a deformed truecel nobody would call that "not art" because the incel is ugly and not beautiful looking.
 
modern art sucks because it is lazy not because its not beautiful though. If I drew a hyper realistic portrait of a deformed truecel nobody would call that "not art" because the incel is ugly and not beautiful looking.
beauty can come from the way art is made, the subject need not be beautiful to make a masterpiece
How artists interpret war - CNN Style
this painting depicts bloodied corpses and fire, but the way the artist paints with such skill is beauty in itself, along with the subject of a desperate and heroic fight. A truecel portrait can be a good artwork simply because of how the artist makes it
Question about Medieval portraits - Freethought Forum
 
beauty can come from the way art is made, the subject need not be beautiful to make a masterpiece
How artists interpret war - CNN Style
this painting depicts bloodied corpses and fire, but the way the artist paints with such skill is beauty in itself, along with the subject of a desperate and heroic fight. A truecel portrait can be a good artwork simply because of how the artist makes it
Question about Medieval portraits - Freethought Forum
I actually agree with this btw.

However, in the image OP posted the artist obviously has some skill. They can draw human proportions decently and have a decent basic understanding of color theory. Is it the best art out there? No, of course not. It's basically just a bland character design sheet with SJW choices mixed in (aka making them non white looking and ugly).

The only reason why it is hated is because the artist decided to give the character unconventional features that look ugly on people(like blond hair on black people, it just looks bad most of the time or big ass noses). If the artist instead drew generic attractive anime girls no one would give a shit even if they drew it with the exact same amount of skill.
 
I actually agree with this btw.

However, in the image OP posted the artist obviously has some skill. They can draw human proportions decently and have a decent basic understanding of color theory. Is it the best art out there? No, of course not. It's basically just a bland character design sheet with SJW choices mixed in (aka making them non white looking and ugly).

The only reason why it is hated is because the artist decided to give the character unconventional features that look ugly on people(like blond hair on black people, it just looks bad most of the time or big ass noses). If the artist instead drew generic attractive anime girls no one would give a shit even if they drew it with the exact same amount of skill.
good point
 
I nose mog them
 

Similar threads

Liu KANG
Replies
44
Views
443
Liu KANG
Liu KANG
Gendocel
Replies
9
Views
233
solblue
solblue
WorthlessSlavicShit
Replies
9
Views
391
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
currycel102
Replies
17
Views
258
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top