Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Would you prefer your country become poorer and socially uneven, if it does the sexual market fairer ?

Ninrod

Ninrod

Bankruptcel
★★★★
Joined
Jul 5, 2018
Posts
337
Question for firstworldcels (because I realized how they have it so much worse).
 
As long as I can still remain above the dirty plebs, I wouldn't mind it
 
Work harder and worse facilities but easier access to femoids.
 
Yes as long as I have food, a wife, a house and dont get shot when I walk outside
 
The west will burn and Asia will rise either way.
 
As long as I get NEETbux, I don't care about my country being a 7th world shithole.
 
Work harder and worse facilities but easier access to femoids.

Then absolutely not. If I am codemned to a life of hard work slaving away for someone else without chance of ever rising for myself, I would prefer to stay without female contact for life.
 
The west will burn and Asia will rise either way.
1527413541700
 
Yes as long as I have food, a wife, a house and dont get shot when I walk outside

You can get shot anywhere in a bad day.

My point is, a harder life and a more uneven income seems to reduce a lot the absolut power Chads have in some countries.
 
I already said I would prefer to live in Africa than this cuck nation
 
There is no place like that.
 
Yes,as long as there is fair distribution of pussy resources among all men i would be glad even if my country turned full commie shithole such as Venezuela
 
Im already planning on moving to Thailand or another SEA nation so yeah. If you had a hot and willing wife to cream in every night then you'd actually feel motivated to wageslave.
 
No, I'm a right wing nationalist.
 
I would accept any drop in my quality of life so long as it ment an equal or greater drop for women, and women don’t do as well in the third world.

I believe in equality. That means that I can either make things better for men or worse for women. It turns out it’s a lot easier to hurt women than help men.
 
My point is, a harder life and a more uneven income seems to reduce a lot the absolut power Chads have in some countries.

Absolutely. While yes, AWALT is a thing, average or downright ugly guys still get a chance in third world countries, because foids figure “he’ll do”; but in the first world, with birth control and protection enabling consequence-free sex, foids only focus on Chads; you would think this makes them less picky but the opposite is the case.
 
No.

Not only would more people suffer from social injustice, but people are likely to just settle for each other which isn't the same as being with someone that actually loves and wants to be with you.
 
fuck no , money is everything in life who needs bitches?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top