Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Would you have been gassed in the Holocaust [if it did happen]

Would have you been gassed in the Holocaust?


  • Total voters
    40
I dont think its a question tbh
 
yes because im retard autists mentally ill
 
Not sure, probably yes though
 
Probably not.
 
There were zero people from many ethnicities in Germany at the time. So it's hard to tell
 
Probably. I am white but lack everywhere else.
 
No, I’m aryan according to the Nuremberg Laws and NS race theory. I’d probably be put in a concentration camp as a forced laborer though for being antisocial and "work shy".
 
im an americunt with slav genes. yes
 
No, because I'd have emigrated to Switzerland in 1933. Then I'd go back to Germany in 1946 and kill wounded/crippled Nazis and I'd get a street named after me in Tel Aviv or some shit.
 
No but i would be put in a working camp for neets :feelsrope:it's a fate worse than fake holohoax
 
I would hold my breath so no
 
I’m a Slav, so no. I would have been in a Russian gulag instead. If I was lucky maybe I could live in a slum and work 16 hours a day in bullet factory
 
There were zero people from many ethnicities in Germany at the time. So it's hard to tell
The only curry executed by Nazis was a Mallu with a French girlfriend. Just be Tamil :blackpill:

@Chudpreet @DarkStar @Diddy @Adolf Kitler

 
JFL at @Myst voting no :lul:
 
I'm not Jewish, so no.
 
@WorthlessSlavicShit what about you?
 
@WorthlessSlavicShit what about you?
Depends how real Generalplan Ost was (I know @DarkStar would dispute that) and whether if it was real it would've eventually included countries not originally planned to be subjected to it.
 
Depends how real Generalplan Ost was (I know @DarkStar would dispute that) and whether if it was real it would've eventually included countries not originally planned to be subjected to it.
The Holocaust that happened in Slovakia mostly only killed Jews right?
 
Depends how real Generalplan Ost was (I know @DarkStar would dispute that) and whether if it was real it would've eventually included countries not originally planned to be subjected to it.
Yes, Slovakia wasn’t included in German plans for colonization of Eastern Europe. If they won your country would most likely stay as a nominally independent satellite state
 
Yes, Slovakia wasn’t included in German plans for colonization of Eastern Europe. If they won your country would most likely stay as a nominally independent satellite state
True.
 
Under the racial pretense no I meet the Nazi criteria for Aryan(not Herrenvolk which I explained the difference with). Anglos were considered Germanics, and Hitler even admired them & initially wished to ally with them. Not much was written on Celts, but I think it's safe to say they were good for sure. Hitler also wrote he liked North italics, due to the Lombard ancestry, same kind of goes for some Slavic groups such as Czechs who some regard as just "Slav-speaking Germans"


And as for my Autism, as I explained the way it was understood at the time was very different, and you would have had to have been very autistic to the point you cannot function by yourself to have been put down. However, given how technology did progress under the Third Reich, it is likely they would have found ways to detect it earlier or perhaps even prevent it. Or perhaps, abortions, sterilizations, etc. of people with it. So not too sure here.
The only curry executed by Nazis was a Mallu with a French girlfriend. Just be Tamil :blackpill:

@Chudpreet @DarkStar @Diddy @Adolf Kitler

Based

And jfl, ofc it's a French whore:feelskek:

France is the country where Liberal degeneracy first sprang its vile self-up under the guise of their "revolution" so it makes sense that their foids are such treacherous and promiscuous whores.

Shame though, I'd really want to be with one:


View: https://x.com/cinecitta2030/status/1799607023224635783

Depends how real Generalplan Ost was (I know @DarkStar would dispute that) and whether if it was real it would've eventually included countries not originally planned to be subjected to it.
Here's what I have on it

Firstly, there's no solidified proof of an actual document existing:
Nearly all the wartime documentation on Generalplan Ost was deliberately destroyed shortly before Germany's defeat in May 1945,[43][96] and the full proposal has never been found, though several documents refer to it or supplement it.

No copy of the supposed "Generalplan Ost" has ever been found, but it is argued to be possible to infer parts of its contents from other sources. A politically correct view is that "Generalplan Ost" refers to a gigantic "Master Plan" of large scale deportation of Slavs (possibly causing mass deaths due to this) and effectively moving Germany's border 1000 km east.

Some revisionists have argued that the sources support that "Generalplan Ost" was a 1941 plan by Konrad Meyer-Hetlich for the new eastern territories recently incorporated into Germany from Poland. The plan included creating a racially homogeneous German population and transferring Poles and Jews from Germany into the non-annexed Polish territories (the General Government). It is argued to not include mass killings.[10][11]

A revisionist view on Generalplan Ost: "This plan, if it ever actually existed as stated, was created for administration purposes — after the war against the SU had started and huge territorial and population gains made at first. On 15 July 1941, Konrad Meyer-Hetlich presented this administrative plan to Himmler, who had requested it.[16] Hitler supposedly discussed his plan in a meeting of 16 July 1941: what is known from this discussion was presented at the IMT as L-221.[17] The original document that might prove the malicious intent of Generalplan Ost does not exist or has never been found — only bits and pieces of related documents were presented at the Nürnberg trials. As such, there is no proof at all that this plan was a long held ambition of Hitler’s, and to try and use it to prove “The Holocaust” is folly.

Hitler openly talked about settling the east and the problems that would have to be overcome. But, he stated, England was controlling 400 million in India with just 250 000 English soldiers and administrators, so it should likewise be possible for Germans to do the same.[18] Hitler outlined how it should be done, by building German cities/villages but explicitly stated that, for the rest of Russia: “…in der wir die Russen leben lassen wie sie wollen, nur daß wir sie beherrschen“ (we will allow the Russians to live as they chose, we will just govern them).[19] Nowhere does he mention killing tens of millions of Slavs, in fact L-221 – according to Hillgruber the Generalplan Ost per se – never alludes to mass killings.
"[6]

David Irving, when testifying at the Ernst Zundel's Holocaust trials, stated regarding another "L" document that: "May I say that I am very wary about any Nuremberg document that has the document number L...This is L-18...Historians are familiar with quite a number of L documents from the Nuremberg series and a lot of them turn out to be forgeries. A lot of them turn out to be produced or manufactured for the Nuremberg trials to the best of my knowledge. So, this is the first thing that would worry me about that" and "I investigated the Nuremberg trials in some detail and I was familiar with the fact that at Nuremberg, they did have a collection of the necessary rubber stamps, the security classification stamps in order to manufacture documents and they did do it. There are several instances where this subsequently turned out...I have published a book on that sir. It's Nuremberg -- The Last Battle."[12]

Overall, I find it very odd as to how they claim all the evidence of it was supposedly destroyed right before the wars end, and the only solidified proof we've yet to see of it, was a few pieces of "documents" presented at the Nuremberg trials.
 
Under the racial pretense no I meet the Nazi criteria for Aryan(not Herrenvolk which I explained the difference with). Anglos were considered Germanics, and Hitler even admired them & initially wished to ally with them. Not much was written on Celts, but I think it's safe to say they were good for sure. Hitler also wrote he liked North italics, due to the Lombard ancestry, same kind of goes for some Slavic groups such as Czechs who some regard as just "Slav-speaking Germans"


And as for my Autism, as I explained the way it was understood at the time was very different, and you would have had to have been very autistic to the point you cannot function by yourself to have been put down. However, given how technology did progress under the Third Reich, it is likely they would have found ways to detect it earlier or perhaps even prevent it. Or perhaps, abortions, sterilizations, etc. of people with it. So not too sure here.

Based

And jfl, ofc it's a French whore:feelskek:

France is the country where Liberal degeneracy first sprang its vile self-up under the guise of their "revolution" so it makes sense that their foids are such treacherous and promiscuous whores.

Shame though, I'd really want to be with one:


View: https://x.com/cinecitta2030/status/1799607023224635783


Here's what I have on it

Firstly, there's no solidified proof of an actual document existing:








Overall, I find it very odd as to how they claim all the evidence of it was supposedly destroyed right before the wars end, and the only solidified proof we've yet to see of it, was a few pieces of "documents" presented at the Nuremberg trials.

Are French more open to racemix? I see more French men and women with curries than anyother whites
 
During the war no. After the Nazis won the war and realized that Romanians are ethnically Slavic and therefore Untermenschen possibly.
 

Would so hard, but she never "would" me:feelsbadman::feelsugh:.

Here's what I have on it

Firstly, there's no solidified proof of an actual document existing:



Overall, I find it very odd as to how they claim all the evidence of it was supposedly destroyed right before the wars end, and the only solidified proof we've yet to see of it, was a few pieces of "documents" presented at the Nuremberg trials.
Good points:feelsokman:.
 
Would so hard, but she never "would" me:feelsbadman::feelsugh:.
Relateable
Good points:feelsokman:.
I mean dude, somehow all of it was destroyed right before the war ended and we're supposed to believe snipets from documents? Yeah, I don't buy it

I mean, even when I was younger it seemed odd to me how such a large-scale killing such as the Holocaust did go down whilst Germany was somehow fighting the world basically
 
From what I remember of reading the memoirs of Viktor e Frankl
He mentioned the moment you gave into despair was when it was all over for you
I am depressed already so I’d die quite quickly jfl
 
I don't think so
 
No, but I wouldn't mind
 

Similar threads

PersonaPimp
Replies
23
Views
679
Paladin
Paladin
SickWeakCoward
Replies
53
Views
1K
Subhuman Trucel
Subhuman Trucel
Fantasea
Replies
27
Views
668
Fantasea
Fantasea

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top