Pacel
Banned
-
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2025
- Posts
- 307
Take into account that the social skills needed to reproduce were much lower but the physical standards (strength, height, health, etc.) were higher.
depends in eurasia i woulve gotten heightmogged by the native paleo-eurasian moggerTake into account that the social skills needed to reproduce were much lower but the physical standards (strength, height, health, etc.) were higher.
Height wouldn't really matter that much in nature, muscle build genetics, testosterone and overall strength are more important. Think of a 5'9 guy with a good fit physique and a 6'5 skinny guy who is really clumsy and prone to injury, the 5'9 guy would absolutely be a better hunter, would still be mogged by someone taller who happens to be more athletic but thats a literal genetic miracle who would be really rare to find in a small community such as a prehistoric tribe. Height is attractive but it doesn't always means an evolutionary advantage, the tall skinny framecel guys would probably die in the wild and wouldn't be able to reproduce.no i’m a manlet
That might've been an elite genetic advantage. No need to compete with Chad if he starved during winter lolMy only one good trait would be fat accumulation so I wouldn't die so quick during famines
Thats mostly luck than anything else. Assume you lived up until your 20's (so you have been sexually developed for some years already) do you think you would have reproduced?I would have most likely died getting mauled by an animal if I had been born in prehistoric times.
Well, considering prehistoric humans were more animalistic and acted more on instincts, then yeah.Thats mostly luck than anything else. Assume you lived up until your 20's (so you have been sexually developed for some years already) do you think you would have reproduced?
I don’t think there would be a need. Back in the primal era there was no need to worry about a toilet disliking you.Take into account that the social skills needed to reproduce were much lower but the physical standards (strength, height, health, etc.) were higher.
If you had some awful social skills to the point in which you wouldn't even be able to co-exist with the other people in your tribe you would've been abandoned and left out to die. Ofc this a much lower standard than nowadays, you'd need bare minimum social skills to live with other people.I don’t think there would be a need. Back in the primal era there was no need to worry about a toilet disliking you.
then the 6,5 built guy comes alongHeight wouldn't really matter that much in nature, muscle build genetics, testosterone and overall strength are more important. Think of a 5'9 guy with a good fit physique and a 6'5 skinny guy who is really clumsy and prone to injury, the 5'9 guy would absolutely be a better hunter, would still be mogged by someone taller who happens to be more athletic but thats a literal genetic miracle who would be really rare to find in a small community such as a prehistoric tribe. Height is attractive but it doesn't always means an evolutionary advantage, the tall skinny framecel guys would probably die in the wild and wouldn't be able to reproduce.
You could just rape and get away with itTake into account that the social skills needed to reproduce were much lower but the physical standards (strength, height, health, etc.) were higher.
then the 6,5 built guy comes along
Not to mention that everyone would be around the same height too because theres was less genetic diversity inside these small groups than in current society. Crazy height differences wouldn't existwould still be mogged by someone taller who happens to be more athletic but thats a literal genetic miracle who would be really rare to find in a small community such as a prehistoric tribe.
I would've died from disease.
untill chad finds out and murders you then kills your sperm with his spermYou could just rape and get away with it
??? Hows this similar lolIt’s very similar to today’s scenario
Mb it was a rather vague statement??? Hows this similar lol
lol no worries, made me laughMb it was a rather vague statement





