You die and your atoms are recycled to create beings. Other organisms will be supplied by your corpse, being reabsorbed by nature. Is this what you meant by ecofuturism?
Life is more than just survival. Just because your vital functions are minimally maintained (almost failing) does not mean you are alive. Without a reason for being, there is no reason to continue. Humans need a noetic sense to justify physical or emotional pain. Since suicide is the antagonist of suffering, one must find elaborate ways to mitigate pain as much as possible in order to die. Generally undertaken in the combination of several medications, which require effort to acquire.
Yes, that's what I mean by ecofuturism.
You are also right that life is more than “surviving”, it really is. When you said that in the absence of reason to be an ontologist there is no reason to continue, you are also right... So let's attribute another factor mentioned by you, the noetic sense as the reason for this, and this noetic sense would minimize your suffering , and what would that be like?! Now, don't cause yourself any more pain, don't attribute any more agony to your agony, and to do that would be trying to be better than yourself, so as not to do unpleasant things, like murder, robbery, anyway... That's already a big step , whatever else you want according to your range, just look for it, or don't, if you don't want it. But, if your “noetic” sense is a choice that will attribute more pain to yourself (indirectly), in this case suicide, then do it too, I can't stop it, it's your choice, but you can also choose not to do it. . ..
...And wouldn't THAT in itself be contrary to its supposed "noetic" meaning (whatever that is)? Look, you're running away from and maximizing your own emotional pain, but if it's your expression, that's okay, express yourself like that, express your pain in pain rather than actually in a state of less pain.
You said that suffering is antagonistic to pain, negative.
If suicide were seen as a direct antagonist to suffering, it would be the definitive and permanent solution to any experience of pain or discomfort. However, this ignores the fact that suffering is an inherent part of human existence and that minimizing it is an ongoing process. Suicide, therefore, eliminates the possibility of dealing with suffering.
The logic that suicide antagonizes suffering may be flawed, as it fails to consider other possibilities, as it permanently interrupts the ability to experience any form of relief or resolution. Therefore, it is not a “noetic” sense as you say.
Sheer force of willpower.
