H
Do you know why feminists are so resilient in communicating their claims to the whole world, while only a handful of incels discuss men's rights?
A guy is responsible for his needs and the needs of those around him. If he cries and stamps his foot that he wants something and they didn't give it to him, not only will he get nothing from others, he will only lose in the eyes of those around him and have it even worse. By communicating his unmet needs he communicates his failure and with such an image he will further hinder his chances of being able to meet those needs.
Women are taught from childhood that talking about what they need makes sense. They can complain first to their dad and then to other peasants that they would like this or that, and it is their responsibility to carry out their wishes. They also have the same relationship with society. From the first years of life to old age, it is natural for women to manage problems by delegating them.
For a woman, it makes sense to communicate her problem out loud because she can count on an outside solution. If a married woman complains about lack of money, it means that her peasant didn't make an effort and because of his failure they are poor together, so he should take on a better job.
That's why millions of women are willing to shout loudly that society doesn't meet their expectations, and society and the people around them are supposed to provide for them. When women want a pony they fight for their rights to access a pony so that someone will arrange it for them. And when a guy wants a pony he has to organize it himself and there is no point in announcing that he wants something, because no one cares.
And in addition, for many peasants, the greater the injustice to the disadvantage of men, the greater the room for showing off how eager they are to carry heavier weights like those peacocks competing with each other as to which one of them will herd the more stubby and awkward tail. They primitively think this will make them look better in women's eyes relative to the competition. Simps and sperm men themselves demand that men be treated worse than women, they support their own discrimination in favor of privileging women. Meanwhile, among women, such a phenomenon of women advocating their own discrimination is practically completely absent.
That's why it looks like this, that feminists are the global mainstream, and men who try to burble something under their noses that they are sometimes uncomfortable too are an exotic ridiculed fringe wandering in the depths of the niche Internet.
Women can count on and willingly call on support, and when something doesn't work out it's a failure of that inept support. A woman will even get a laptop for free on the first date. She can set up a collection that she would like to become a gay woman and from strangers she will get a computer. A guy is taught that his cry is like a cry in the desert. He doesn't expect to get anything from society thanks to his demand.
A man is not there to get support only to give this support and it is better for him to give in this. If something doesn't work out for him, let him, for his own sake, better keep quiet. The average guy should still have a reserve of strength and ability to cope with the problems of those around him in addition to his own affairs, and his own problems are the bare minimum that should not trouble him.
And if he already needs to complain about the injustices of this world, then he must necessarily anonymously so as not to make a fuss about himself. Because he'd be finished if someone reported his manager at the corpo, who shares daily accounts on social media about the fight against patriarchy, misogyny, and who recently criticized her favorite party, the Left, for posting a picture before the elections saying that men have the right to cry, because as a proud feminist she thinks that trying to please guys is unnecessary. People at work are surprised that she has a husband who puts up with her and agrees with her in everything. He nods at her in everything, because he hopes that by doing so he can earn the right to serve her once a week as a living dildo, with which she tries to relieve the tension accumulated at work every Sunday.
Everyone around her on TV, the Internet and in real life complains about systemic discrimination against women, even the male simps around her, so she shouldn't be surprised. As if some privileged guy broke away from the Christmas tree and mentioned something to her that he too might have it bad, it's not surprising that such an outrageously unhinged heretic would want to burn at the stake. Everyone unanimously says that women have it worse, so a peasant who breaks the taboo by talking about men's problems must, in her mind, be doing it maliciously because of misogyny. In such a situation, all she would have to do is call out her simpletons announcing that she has a problem with this guy, and at her beck and call they would immediately explain to him that women have it worse. She herself wouldn't even have to explain to him. All she would have to do is demand a solution, and others would provide it.
A guy is responsible for his needs and the needs of those around him. If he cries and stamps his foot that he wants something and they didn't give it to him, not only will he get nothing from others, he will only lose in the eyes of those around him and have it even worse. By communicating his unmet needs he communicates his failure and with such an image he will further hinder his chances of being able to meet those needs.
Women are taught from childhood that talking about what they need makes sense. They can complain first to their dad and then to other peasants that they would like this or that, and it is their responsibility to carry out their wishes. They also have the same relationship with society. From the first years of life to old age, it is natural for women to manage problems by delegating them.
For a woman, it makes sense to communicate her problem out loud because she can count on an outside solution. If a married woman complains about lack of money, it means that her peasant didn't make an effort and because of his failure they are poor together, so he should take on a better job.
That's why millions of women are willing to shout loudly that society doesn't meet their expectations, and society and the people around them are supposed to provide for them. When women want a pony they fight for their rights to access a pony so that someone will arrange it for them. And when a guy wants a pony he has to organize it himself and there is no point in announcing that he wants something, because no one cares.
And in addition, for many peasants, the greater the injustice to the disadvantage of men, the greater the room for showing off how eager they are to carry heavier weights like those peacocks competing with each other as to which one of them will herd the more stubby and awkward tail. They primitively think this will make them look better in women's eyes relative to the competition. Simps and sperm men themselves demand that men be treated worse than women, they support their own discrimination in favor of privileging women. Meanwhile, among women, such a phenomenon of women advocating their own discrimination is practically completely absent.
That's why it looks like this, that feminists are the global mainstream, and men who try to burble something under their noses that they are sometimes uncomfortable too are an exotic ridiculed fringe wandering in the depths of the niche Internet.
Women can count on and willingly call on support, and when something doesn't work out it's a failure of that inept support. A woman will even get a laptop for free on the first date. She can set up a collection that she would like to become a gay woman and from strangers she will get a computer. A guy is taught that his cry is like a cry in the desert. He doesn't expect to get anything from society thanks to his demand.
A man is not there to get support only to give this support and it is better for him to give in this. If something doesn't work out for him, let him, for his own sake, better keep quiet. The average guy should still have a reserve of strength and ability to cope with the problems of those around him in addition to his own affairs, and his own problems are the bare minimum that should not trouble him.
And if he already needs to complain about the injustices of this world, then he must necessarily anonymously so as not to make a fuss about himself. Because he'd be finished if someone reported his manager at the corpo, who shares daily accounts on social media about the fight against patriarchy, misogyny, and who recently criticized her favorite party, the Left, for posting a picture before the elections saying that men have the right to cry, because as a proud feminist she thinks that trying to please guys is unnecessary. People at work are surprised that she has a husband who puts up with her and agrees with her in everything. He nods at her in everything, because he hopes that by doing so he can earn the right to serve her once a week as a living dildo, with which she tries to relieve the tension accumulated at work every Sunday.
Everyone around her on TV, the Internet and in real life complains about systemic discrimination against women, even the male simps around her, so she shouldn't be surprised. As if some privileged guy broke away from the Christmas tree and mentioned something to her that he too might have it bad, it's not surprising that such an outrageously unhinged heretic would want to burn at the stake. Everyone unanimously says that women have it worse, so a peasant who breaks the taboo by talking about men's problems must, in her mind, be doing it maliciously because of misogyny. In such a situation, all she would have to do is call out her simpletons announcing that she has a problem with this guy, and at her beck and call they would immediately explain to him that women have it worse. She herself wouldn't even have to explain to him. All she would have to do is demand a solution, and others would provide it.
