Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Women would choose full abortion control over the ability to vote

AdExpress

AdExpress

Recruit
★★
Joined
Jun 18, 2025
Posts
120
Perhaps water but the only reason they pushed for the vote was so they could be financially independent from men so they did not have to marry a sub 9 man in order to survive and instead be able to have sex with as much Chads as possible without the fear of not being able to live by themselves, On top of this sexual independence via birth control so they could have as much sex with Chads as possinle without fear of consequences of raising a baby alone. Well there's no way women's workforce rights will ever be restricted or taken away it's too baked into cultures now and the only "issue" left amongst political spaces is abortion and birth control. Pretty certain if they could have full and total control of this they'd give up voting rights straight away such is the biological need to be a literal human fleshlight

Figure-3-AUGAPS-1.png

Would u guys support this if it meant women had absolutely no say on any other issue?
 
They ain't giving up voting rights just because of abortion and birth control, what are you even on?
 
They ain't giving up voting rights just because of abortion and birth control, what are you even on?
u literally saw women turn an entire election in america into a women vs men thing solely because trump planned to allow states to choose abortion laws not even ban it just allow each state to have their own opinion.
 
Perhaps water but the only reason they pushed for the vote was so they could be financially independent from men so they did not have to marry a sub 9 man in order to survive and instead be able to have sex with as much Chads as possible without the fear of not being able to live by themselves,
Aren't Chads a minority or something? How do women have have sex with so many then? Surely some men women are with must not be Chads.

On top of this sexual independence via birth control so they could have as much sex with Chads as possinle without fear of consequences of raising a baby alone.
Babies aren't a "consequence," which is a word that has a negative connotation.
 
u literally saw women turn an entire election in america into a women vs men thing solely because trump planned to allow states to choose abortion laws not even ban it just allow each state to have their own opinion.
I don't understand why the fact that they win or lose abortion will affect whether they want or not to be allowed to vote??
 
Aren't Chads a minority or something? How do they have have sex with so many then? Surely some men they're with must not be Chads.


Babies aren't a "consequence," which is a word that has a negative connotation.
i know it isn't but to them it is i'm pro life
 
Aren't Chads a minority or something? How do they have have sex with so many then? Surely some men they're with must not be Chads.
Oh, my sweet sweet summer child...
 
They ain't giving up voting rights just because of abortion and birth control, what are you even on?
Most women don't even vote because they're not rational enough to think long-term. They'd absolutely give up voting rights in exchange for being allowed to be whores and dodge consequences
 
Oh, my sweet sweet summer child...
Aren't Chads the top 1% of men? I do remember reading an incel post saying that the bottom 99% of men should destroy the top 1%. I'm not advocating that. Don't do that.
 
Aren't Chads the top 1% of men? I do remember reading an incel post saying that the bottom 99% of men should destroy the top 1%. I'm not advocating that. Don't do that.
The issue is not men, the standards are created by women not by men. But 1% is an exaggeration, I'd say 10-25%
 
The issue is not men, the standards are created by women not by men. But 1% is an exaggeration, I'd say 10-25%
Also, aren't you implying that a large majority of men aren't being fucked by women? You're saying only Chads fuck. If that's true, why is this forum so small?
 
Also, aren't you implying that a large majority of men aren't being fucked by women? You're saying only Chads fuck. If that's true, why is this forum so small?
Normies will get those for who Chad has no time.
 
Normies will get those for who Chad has no time.
Also didn't OP imply that sluts aren't fucking incels. Whores are sluts for pay. Many incels escortmaxx. Therefore sluts fuck incels. If it weren't for slut shaming sluts who do it for free may even fuck incels.
 
Yes, not many people care about voting in general, but everyone cares about being able to have as much sex as possible. I plan to make a post about this, but it's just funny that the right to vote has become the benchmark for when women have stopped being "oppressed" when in modern democracies, 30-40% of people routinely don't bother to vote anyway (as seen in the presidential elections in the USA and EU and Indian parliamentary elections).
 
more abortion = less niggers
that too jfl :lul:

but except for sheboons white foids have the most abortions becuase they're all getting knocked up by chad whereas Asian immagrants don't get abortions anyway, so I'm not sure it's best for the white to everyone else ratio.
 
Abortion over inflation and climate change what the fuck. The only thing their minds can concieve of is sex with chad. I do not hate foids because of their hypergamy, it is the unfortunate reality of life and evolution. I hate foids because of this, they are not even human, they are completely subject to this animalistic desire, every action they take is for this purpose, they have no souls.
 
Last edited:
that too jfl :lul:

but except for sheboons white foids have the most abortions becuase they're all getting knocked up by chad whereas Asian immagrants don't get abortions anyway, so I'm not sure it's best for the white to everyone else ratio.
If im correct whites are about 50% of the US population but "only" 25% of the abortions
 
I guess cos all the red states are predominantly white maybe
 
I guess cos all the red states are predominantly white maybe
Not at all
red states = nigger states
(For the south at least, see: louisiana, mississipi, alabama, etc...)
Most of the democrats states are also the whitest (they dont have a problem with immigration cause they dont have to face the consequences)
 
Most of the democrats states are also the whitest (they dont have a problem with immigration cause they dont have to face the consequences)
Ah I see, forgive me I am not from the US was making uneducated assumptions
 
Because I probably wouldn't have been born
That may be true if every single baby was aborted, but in reality, abortion only serves to grant women unilateral power in the dictation of whether a life can, or cannot be. It also allows them to engage in hedonistic behaviors without facing any consequences for it, which is undoubtedly detrimental, and reinforces the gynocentric nature of society.
 
That may be true if every single baby was aborted, but in reality, abortion only serves to grant women unilateral power in the dictation of whether a life can, or cannot be. It also allows them to engage in hedonistic behaviors without facing any consequences for it, which is undoubtedly detrimental, and reinforces the gynocentric nature of society.
Yeh I agree, I also agree it is completely fucked up at the rates at which foids get abortions in places where it is unrestricted. But I still would rather have not been born (I was an accident so good chance I could've been aborted.)
 
But I still would rather have not been born
Same. I do believe nonexistence is preferable, since suffering is ingrained into reality in a metaphysical sense—primarily in the Schopenhauerian sense of the will as suffering.
 
Same. I do believe nonexistence is preferable, since suffering is ingrained into reality in a metaphysical sense—primarily in the Schopenhauerian sense of the will as suffering.
I believe a small portion of lives across the animal kingdom (and universe if there is other life) are worth living, those of chad, but over a large enough sample size it is guaranteed that life will result in net suffering, especially when you consider that for those chads to exist, countless generations of selection and struggle must have occurred.
 

Similar threads

The Judge
Replies
22
Views
838
Fukumine
Fukumine
AdExpress
Replies
18
Views
249
Vilsonicvs
Vilsonicvs
C
Replies
2
Views
268
copetillirope
C
God's Lonely Man
Replies
19
Views
477
God's Lonely Man
God's Lonely Man

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top