Serious Women that care about the environment must breed short men

[Man]

Tall men leave larger carbon footprints than short men.

There is a 23% increase in (Basal Metabolic Rate) calorie requirements for being 6'3 as apposed to 5'7.

Every 4 years, a 6'3 man will have consumed enough food to sustain another person for a year.​

Light physical activity raises this caloric difference to 500 calories, which is enough to sustain infants daily and half the daily caloric intake for young children.

Breeding tall men is environmentally unsustainable. Liberals who mate with tall men care more about their pussy juice than the fate of the planet they and their children inhabit.

 

[trying to ascend]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

 

[DukatCel]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

 

[Man]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

True. The whores that say they’re anti capitalist are the biggest capitalist consumers.

“Down with billionaires” she says as she just finished a $3,000 shopping spree on Amazon.

 

[DukatCel]

The same people who brag about the environment also support electric cars and eating avocados in northern europe.

 

[Fallenleaves]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

Consoooom

 

[willystroker]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

I noticed this. Foids are the most vocal about the environment, but the most they will do is go vegan for a while or buy a Tesla. The people who are actually making serious efforts to save the environment are almost always men.

 

[LL maxi]

Tall men leave larger carbon footprints than short men.

View attachment 691026
There is a 23% increase in (Basal Metabolic Rate) calorie requirements for being 6'3 as apposed to 5'7.

Every 4 years, a 6'3 man will have consumed enough food to sustain another person for a year.​

Light physical activity raises this caloric difference to 500 calories, which is enough to sustain infants daily and half the daily caloric intake for young children.
View attachment 691027

Breeding tall men is environmentally unsustainable. Liberals who mate with tall men care more about their pussy juice than the fate of the planet they and their children inhabit.

IT won't reply to this

 

[Leonardo Part V]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

 

[ForevrAlone]

It's just virtue signaling, they supposedly care about the environment, but are the biggest consumers in the world

 

[timmy]

no woman cares abt the envroment, its a tranny thing

women just wanna buy shit and suck dick thats it

 

[Autistic Uggo]

It's all virtue signalling.

 

[Man]

New York Times essay says you should mate with short people to save the planet

An essay written by author, Mara Altman, for the New York Times insisted that being short is “better” for the future to the amusement of several Twitter users on Sunday and Monday.

nypost.com

This stupid bitch journalist stole my idea and made money from it. [Check dates]
Fuck women

 

[Man]

This was the article she wrote 1 day after my post

Opinion | There Has Never Been a Better Time to Be Short

Short people don’t just save resources; as resources become scarcer owing to overpopulation and global warming, they may also be best suited for long-term survival.

www.nytimes.com

Stupid fucking cunt

 

[RegularManlet]

Yo im such an environmentalist where the hoes at though

Classic short king W

also skibidi rizz