Discussion Women should be forced to have sex with incels.

[juggmymaxilla]

The muslims do that in afghansitan and syria. An incel's parents can get him an arranged marriage with whatever foid he wants, then he can have sex with her as much as he wants. If she refuses the muslims stone her

I’m not the biggest fan of religion but if they got one thing right it’s this.

 

[Krad]

nobody cares about us brocel, we already know this, we can just LDAR or rope

I do care for all people here. Even if no one else does.

 

[universallyabhorred]

The muslims do that in afghansitan and syria. An incel's parents can get him an arranged marriage with whatever foid he wants, then he can have sex with her as much as he wants. If she refuses the muslims stone her

 

[sadmanlet5629]

I can’t support or promote ideas that involve coercion, forced sex, imprisonment, or stripping people of their rights. That would mean endorsing violence and abuse.


I do want to engage with you on the underlying pain and frustration you’re pointing at, because loneliness, rejection, and sexual isolation can be genuinely devastating—and ignoring that suffering hasn’t helped anyone.


But the moment solutions turn into forcing women’s bodies to serve men, the conversation stops being about healing loneliness and becomes about institutionalized violence. That doesn’t solve an “incel crisis.” It creates a human-rights catastrophe and guarantees more trauma, rage, and instability for everyone involved—including the men it claims to help.


If you actually want to reduce the suffering of lonely men, there are paths that don’t rely on coercion:


What doesn’t work

• Forced relationships → produces resentment, fear, trauma, and backlash
• Sexual access without consent → doesn’t create love, connection, or dignity
• Treating women as resources → increases social collapse, not stability

What can actually help

• Mental health access for socially isolated men (depression, anxiety, trauma are massive drivers here)
• Social skills and confidence training that isn’t pickup-artist garbage
• Community spaces where men can build identity outside of sexual success
• Dating culture reforms that reduce algorithmic hyper-competition (apps reward extremes)
• Economic stability—romantic prospects track strongly with job security and housing
• Male friendship and mentorship—a lot of what gets framed as “sexual deprivation” is really emotional starvation

You’re right about one thing:
society has completely failed a large group of men who feel invisible and disposable.
But turning that pain into a justification for enslaving women is not compassion—it’s just redirecting suffering onto someone else.


If you want, we can talk seriously about:

• Why incel ideology feels convincing when you’re hurting
• What actually reduces male loneliness in real-world data
• Or how societies can support romantically unsuccessful men without violating anyone’s autonomy

I’ll engage with any of those. I won’t engage with plans that require hurting people to make others feel better.

 

[sadmanlet5629]

I can’t support or promote ideas that involve coercion, forced sex, imprisonment, or stripping people of their rights. That would mean endorsing violence and abuse.


I do want to engage with you on the underlying pain and frustration you’re pointing at, because loneliness, rejection, and sexual isolation can be genuinely devastating—and ignoring that suffering hasn’t helped anyone.


But the moment solutions turn into forcing women’s bodies to serve men, the conversation stops being about healing loneliness and becomes about institutionalized violence. That doesn’t solve an “incel crisis.” It creates a human-rights catastrophe and guarantees more trauma, rage, and instability for everyone involved—including the men it claims to help.


If you actually want to reduce the suffering of lonely men, there are paths that don’t rely on coercion:


What doesn’t work

• Forced relationships → produces resentment, fear, trauma, and backlash
• Sexual access without consent → doesn’t create love, connection, or dignity
• Treating women as resources → increases social collapse, not stability

What can actually help

• Mental health access for socially isolated men (depression, anxiety, trauma are massive drivers here)
• Social skills and confidence training that isn’t pickup-artist garbage
• Community spaces where men can build identity outside of sexual success
• Dating culture reforms that reduce algorithmic hyper-competition (apps reward extremes)
• Economic stability—romantic prospects track strongly with job security and housing
• Male friendship and mentorship—a lot of what gets framed as “sexual deprivation” is really emotional starvation

You’re right about one thing:
society has completely failed a large group of men who feel invisible and disposable.
But turning that pain into a justification for enslaving women is not compassion—it’s just redirecting suffering onto someone else.


If you want, we can talk seriously about:

• Why incel ideology feels convincing when you’re hurting
• What actually reduces male loneliness in real-world data
• Or how societies can support romantically unsuccessful men without violating anyone’s autonomy

I’ll engage with any of those. I won’t engage with plans that require hurting people to make others feel better.

From chatgpfoid

 

[Calamari Sun]

 

[Shitskin=Shitlife]

I can’t support or promote ideas that involve coercion, forced sex, imprisonment, or stripping people of their rights. That would mean endorsing violence and abuse.


I do want to engage with you on the underlying pain and frustration you’re pointing at, because loneliness, rejection, and sexual isolation can be genuinely devastating—and ignoring that suffering hasn’t helped anyone.


But the moment solutions turn into forcing women’s bodies to serve men, the conversation stops being about healing loneliness and becomes about institutionalized violence. That doesn’t solve an “incel crisis.” It creates a human-rights catastrophe and guarantees more trauma, rage, and instability for everyone involved—including the men it claims to help.


If you actually want to reduce the suffering of lonely men, there are paths that don’t rely on coercion:


What doesn’t work

• Forced relationships → produces resentment, fear, trauma, and backlash
• Sexual access without consent → doesn’t create love, connection, or dignity
• Treating women as resources → increases social collapse, not stability

What can actually help

• Mental health access for socially isolated men (depression, anxiety, trauma are massive drivers here)
• Social skills and confidence training that isn’t pickup-artist garbage
• Community spaces where men can build identity outside of sexual success
• Dating culture reforms that reduce algorithmic hyper-competition (apps reward extremes)
• Economic stability—romantic prospects track strongly with job security and housing
• Male friendship and mentorship—a lot of what gets framed as “sexual deprivation” is really emotional starvation

You’re right about one thing:
society has completely failed a large group of men who feel invisible and disposable.
But turning that pain into a justification for enslaving women is not compassion—it’s just redirecting suffering onto someone else.


If you want, we can talk seriously about:

• Why incel ideology feels convincing when you’re hurting
• What actually reduces male loneliness in real-world data
• Or how societies can support romantically unsuccessful men without violating anyone’s autonomy

I’ll engage with any of those. I won’t engage with plans that require hurting people to make others feel better.

The needs and the suffering of incels are more important than the rights of a foid with a body count of 200. She has already fucked millions of men. One incel isn't the end of the world.

 

[ogercel]

Seize the means of reproduction