Toxic Femininity Women more likely to endorse political violence

[Grodd]

Women Are More Likely Than Men to Endorse Political Violence

A new survey finding points to the dangers of digital outrage culture.

www.city-journal.org

When we talk about political violence, we almost always assume that its perpetrators are young men. That makes sense: men are statistically more likely to engage in physical aggression and get arrested for violent crimes at higher rates. At the same time, many are dealing with rising unemployment, declining educational achievement, and growing social disengagement. Given all that, researchers may reasonably assume that young men are driving greater tolerance for political violence.

New data complicate that assumption. A recent survey by the Network Contagion Research Institute at Rutgers found that under certain conditions, women were more likely than men to express support for political violence. The findings were so counter to the prevailing narrative that they surprised even the researchers.

The so called empathetic and loving gender . As it goes foids will push for violence and as they themselves are physically inferior they will count on simps to act upon the violence for them to where foids will face no accountability for whatever happens.

This lens helps make sense of some of the strangest corners of the internet. Consider the online reaction to Luigi Mangione. After his arrest for the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, some treated Mangione not as a killer, but as a celebrity. They even explicitly sexualized him, describing him as attractive, charismatic, and even romantic.

When violence is paired with attraction, it stops being judged on moral terms. Instead of asking whether an action is wrong, people start asking whether it feels meaningful, expressive, or somehow justified.

Yep foids will absolutely justify violence if the perpetrator is a Man they deem as attractive . Foids do not have morals as their "morality" is selective and based on looks.

 

[deleted dude]

water is wet

 

[nakolas]

Foids are fucking idiots

 

[PhineasSpear]

Foids love hypermasculinity. Violence is a hypermasculine trait.

 

[PhineasSpear]

The so called empathetic and loving gender

 

[Aspiring Janitor]

Foids are more likely to endorse violence because they never have to experience it.

 

[Grodd]

Foids love hypermasculinity. Violence is a hypermasculine trait.

When associated with Chad

 

[PhineasSpear]

When associated with Chad

Of course.

 

[Yunoo]

Foids love hypermasculinity. Violence is a hypermasculine trait.

 

[SmhChan]

"Endorsing political violence is an evolutionary survival strategy for us fe-fails, you silly inkwell. "

I'm pretty sure the article has some similar justification.

 

[Grodd]

"Endorsing political violence is an evolutionary survival strategy for us fe-fails, you silly inkwell. "

Wouldn't be surprised if a hole used that as an excuse to be honest

 

[SmhChan]

Wouldn't be surprised if a hole used that as an excuse to be honest

Ultimate goal is, "Gyno-fascism is an evolutionary survival strategy for us. Get used to the plantation, you silly inkwell."

 

[tired as fuck]

Water is wet but those researchers are in bad faith, and the website sounds feminist as fuck, who the fuck writes like that when drawing a conclusion from a study "we weren't ever expecting this, now how should we spin this around to our advantage?"

 

[Hoppipolla]

They seem to encourage it a lot but not do it themselves.

Maybe it's because it's part of how they judge the strength of men.